JavaFX vs React Native Desktop

Overview

React Native Desktop

Stacks15

Followers203

Votes11

JavaFX

Stacks280

Followers418

Votes11

JavaFX vs React Native Desktop: What are the differences?

Language and Platform Compatibility: JavaFX is primarily used with Java programming language and relies on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) for its execution, while React Native Desktop uses JavaScript and React framework, making it more suitable for web developers familiar with these technologies.
Performance and Speed: JavaFX applications typically exhibit better performance due to their direct access to system resources, while React Native Desktop applications may experience some performance limitations as they run within a JavaScript environment.
UI Components and Customization: JavaFX offers a wide range of built-in UI components and customization options, making it easier for developers to create complex user interfaces, whereas React Native Desktop provides a more lightweight set of components that are more web-centric in nature.
Code Reusability: React Native Desktop allows for a high level of code reusability across different platforms, as the same codebase can be used to develop desktop, mobile, and web applications, whereas JavaFX focuses more on desktop-specific development and may not offer the same level of cross-platform compatibility.
Community Support and Ecosystem: React Native Desktop benefits from a vibrant community and extensive ecosystem of plugins and libraries, facilitating rapid development and integration of third-party tools, whereas JavaFX, being a more mature technology, may have a narrower range of community-supported resources.
Ease of Deployment: JavaFX applications are typically easier to deploy, requiring only the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) on the target machine, while React Native Desktop applications may have more dependencies and configurations, especially for different operating systems.

In Summary, JavaFX offers better performance and customization for desktop applications, whereas React Native Desktop allows for greater code reusability and cross-platform compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

React Native Desktop	JavaFX
Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.	It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.
Statistics
Stacks 15	Stacks 280
Followers 203	Followers 418
Votes 11	Votes 11
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Pretty awesome 2 Memory usage reduced 2 Is native app 2 Does not include any browser 1 Open source Cons 0 Memory usage reduced	Pros 11 Light Cons 1 Complicated 1 Community support less than qt
Integrations
React Native	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to React Native Desktop, JavaFX?

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

wxWidgets

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

Qt5

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

JUCE

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

Proton Native

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.

NodeGUI

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

SDL

It is a cross-platform development library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, and graphics hardware via OpenGL and Direct3D.

Element

Element is a Vue 2.0 based component library for developers, designers and product managers, with a set of design resources.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

JavaFX vs React Native Desktop: What are the differences?

Language and Platform Compatibility: JavaFX is primarily used with Java programming language and relies on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) for its execution, while React Native Desktop uses JavaScript and React framework, making it more suitable for web developers familiar with these technologies.
Performance and Speed: JavaFX applications typically exhibit better performance due to their direct access to system resources, while React Native Desktop applications may experience some performance limitations as they run within a JavaScript environment.
UI Components and Customization: JavaFX offers a wide range of built-in UI components and customization options, making it easier for developers to create complex user interfaces, whereas React Native Desktop provides a more lightweight set of components that are more web-centric in nature.
Code Reusability: React Native Desktop allows for a high level of code reusability across different platforms, as the same codebase can be used to develop desktop, mobile, and web applications, whereas JavaFX focuses more on desktop-specific development and may not offer the same level of cross-platform compatibility.
Community Support and Ecosystem: React Native Desktop benefits from a vibrant community and extensive ecosystem of plugins and libraries, facilitating rapid development and integration of third-party tools, whereas JavaFX, being a more mature technology, may have a narrower range of community-supported resources.
Ease of Deployment: JavaFX applications are typically easier to deploy, requiring only the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) on the target machine, while React Native Desktop applications may have more dependencies and configurations, especially for different operating systems.

In Summary, JavaFX offers better performance and customization for desktop applications, whereas React Native Desktop allows for greater code reusability and cross-platform compatibility.