StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Javalin vs Spark Framework

Javalin vs Spark Framework

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spark Framework
Spark Framework
Stacks39
Followers91
Votes7
GitHub Stars9.7K
Forks1.6K
Javalin
Javalin
Stacks30
Followers64
Votes3

Javalin vs Spark Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction Javalin and Spark Framework are both lightweight web frameworks that are used for building web applications in Java. While they serve a similar purpose, there are some key differences between the two.

1. Request Handling: Javalin handles requests in a non-blocking manner by using Kotlin coroutines or Java CompletableFutures, allowing for improved scalability and performance. On the other hand, Spark Framework handles requests in a blocking manner, which may result in slower performance when dealing with high concurrent traffic.

2. Middleware Functionality: Javalin provides a middleware concept known as "handlers" which allows for easy modification and manipulation of HTTP requests and responses at various points in the request pipeline. In contrast, Spark Framework does not provide built-in middleware functionality, requiring developers to write custom code for similar functionality.

3. Routing: Javalin provides a powerful routing API that allows developers to define routes using a fluent syntax, making it easier to handle different HTTP methods and route parameters. In comparison, Spark Framework uses a simpler route mapping syntax, which may be easier for beginners but lacks some of the advanced routing features provided by Javalin.

4. Templating Support: Javalin does not provide built-in support for templating engines, requiring developers to use third-party libraries for server-side rendering. On the other hand, Spark Framework includes built-in support for popular templating engines like Thymeleaf and Mustache, making it easier to generate dynamic HTML views.

5. WebSocket Support: Javalin includes support for WebSocket communication out of the box, making it easier to build real-time applications that require bidirectional communication between server and client. In contrast, Spark Framework does not provide native support for WebSocket communication, requiring developers to use additional libraries or implement custom solutions.

6. Database Integration: Javalin allows developers to integrate with various databases using the Java Persistence API (JPA) or SQL-based libraries like JOOQ and jDBI. Spark Framework, on the other hand, does not provide built-in database integration and requires developers to use external libraries for working with databases.

In summary, Javalin offers non-blocking request handling, built-in middleware functionality, powerful routing API, flexible templating options, WebSocket support, and database integration. While Spark Framework provides a simpler routing syntax and built-in support for templating engines, it lacks some of the advanced features and flexibility provided by Javalin.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Spark Framework, Javalin

Juan José
Juan José

May 1, 2020

Decided

I developed Hexagon heavily inspired in these great tools because of the following reasons:

  • Take full advantage of the Kotlin programming language without any strings attached to Java (as a language).
  • I wanted to be able to replace the HTTP server library used with different adapters (Jetty, Netty, etc.) and though right now there is only one, more are coming.
  • Have a complete tool to do full applications, though you can use other libraries, Hexagon comes with a dependency injection helper, settings loading from different sources and HTTP Client, so it comes with (batteries included).

Right now I'm using it for my pet projects, and I'm happy with it.

35.9k views35.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spark Framework
Spark Framework
Javalin
Javalin

It is a simple and expressive Java/Kotlin web framework DSL built for rapid development. Its intention is to provide an alternative for Kotlin/Java developers that want to develop their web applications as expressive as possible and with minimal boilerplate.

Javalin started as a fork of the Spark framework but quickly turned into a ground-up rewrite influenced by express.js. Both of these web frameworks are inspired by the modern micro web framework grandfather: Sinatra, so if you’re coming from Ruby then Javalin shouldn’t feel too unfamiliar.

Built for productivity; Lets you take full advantage of the JVM
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
39
Stacks
30
Followers
91
Followers
64
Votes
7
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Very easy to get up and running. Lovely API
  • 1
    Easy
  • 1
    Fast
  • 1
    Ideal for microservices
  • 1
    Native paralelization
Pros
  • 1
    Does not require IDEA plugins
  • 1
    Rich support of template engines
  • 1
    Lightweight
Integrations
Kotlin
Kotlin
Java
Java
Kotlin
Kotlin
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Spark Framework, Javalin?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase