StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Jetty vs Payara

Jetty vs Payara

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jetty
Jetty
Stacks510
Followers311
Votes47
Payara
Payara
Stacks41
Followers73
Votes0
GitHub Stars903
Forks312

Jetty vs Payara: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison of Jetty and Payara, highlighting the key differences between the two.

  1. Scalability: Jetty is known for its lightweight and highly scalable architecture. It is designed to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. On the other hand, Payara offers a more robust and enterprise-grade solution that can handle heavy workloads and scale horizontally by adding more instances in a cluster.

  2. Containerization Support: Jetty is compatible with containerization technologies like Docker, allowing applications to be easily packaged and deployed in container environments. Payara, on the other hand, provides advanced features for running containerized applications, such as support for Kubernetes and integration with popular container orchestration tools.

  3. Monitoring and Management: Payara provides comprehensive monitoring and management capabilities with its built-in Administration Console. It offers real-time monitoring of server statistics, application performance, and health checks. In contrast, Jetty lacks built-in monitoring and management tools, relying on third-party solutions for similar functionality.

  4. Java EE Compatibility: Payara is built on top of GlassFish, a Java EE reference implementation. As a result, it provides full support for Java EE specifications and APIs, making it suitable for developing enterprise applications that require compliance with Java EE standards. Jetty, on the other hand, is a lightweight web server and servlet container that focuses on providing a minimalistic and fast runtime environment, without full Java EE support.

  5. Community and Support: Jetty has a large and active open-source community, which provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support. It has been widely adopted and used in various projects. Payara also has a supportive community, but being a relatively newer platform, it might have a smaller user base compared to Jetty.

  6. Commercial Support: Payara offers commercial support and enterprise features through its Payara Services. This includes advanced support contracts, consulting services, and additional enterprise-grade features. Jetty, being an open-source project, does not have a dedicated commercial support offering, although commercial support may be available from third-party vendors.

In Summary, Jetty and Payara differ in terms of scalability, containerization support, monitoring and management capabilities, Java EE compatibility, community and support, as well as the availability of commercial support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jetty
Jetty
Payara
Payara

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

It Server is a drop in replacement for GlassFish Server Open Source Edition with quarterly releases containing enhancements, bug fixes and patches.

Full-featured and standards-based; Open source and commercially usable; Flexible and extensible; Small footprint; Embeddable; Asynchronous; Enterprise scalable; Dual licensed under Apache and Eclipse
Full Web Based Administration Console; Fully Scriptable Command Line Interface; Full REST-based Management Console; Fully Instrumented via JMX; Supports Rolling Upgrades of Java EE Applications
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
903
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
312
Stacks
510
Stacks
41
Followers
311
Followers
73
Votes
47
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Embeddable
  • 10
    Very fast
  • 6
    Scalable
  • 6
    Very thin
Cons
  • 0
    Student
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
CentOS
CentOS
Oracle
Oracle
Windows
Windows
Ubuntu
Ubuntu

What are some alternatives to Jetty, Payara?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase