StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs Jetty

Apache Tomcat vs Jetty

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jetty
Jetty
Stacks510
Followers311
Votes47
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K

Apache Tomcat vs Jetty: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Tomcat and Jetty are both popular web servers and servlet containers used to serve Java web applications. While they have similarities in their functionality and purpose, there are also key differences between the two. This article will outline six key differences between Apache Tomcat and Jetty.

  1. Configuration: One key difference between Apache Tomcat and Jetty is the way they handle configuration. Tomcat typically requires XML configuration files and a separate installation, while Jetty uses a more flexible approach with properties files and a lightweight embedded server. This makes it easier to configure and deploy applications on Jetty.

  2. Embeddability: Another difference is in their embeddability. Jetty is often favored for embedded scenarios as it can be easily integrated into other Java applications and frameworks. It provides an API that allows developers to embed Jetty into their own applications, providing greater control over the server environment. Tomcat, on the other hand, is typically used as a standalone server and is not as easily embeddable.

  3. Performance: In terms of performance, Jetty is known for its lightweight architecture and low memory footprint. It is designed to handle a high number of concurrent connections efficiently, making it well-suited for applications with high traffic. Tomcat, on the other hand, may require more resources and is generally considered to be slower than Jetty.

  4. Community and Support: Apache Tomcat has a larger and more established community compared to Jetty. This means that Tomcat has a wealth of resources, documentation, and community support available, making it easier to find solutions to problems. Jetty, while still having an active community, may not have as extensive a support network.

  5. Advanced Features: Apache Tomcat includes a wider range of advanced features and capabilities out-of-the-box, such as support for clustering, session replication, and load balancing. These features are not as readily available in Jetty and may require additional configuration or plugins.

  6. Suitability and Use Cases: The choice between Apache Tomcat and Jetty often depends on the specific use case and requirements of the application. Tomcat is a good choice for larger, enterprise-level applications that require advanced features and a robust support network. Jetty, on the other hand, is well-suited for lightweight applications, microservices, and embedded scenarios where performance and embeddability are important factors.

In summary, Apache Tomcat and Jetty differ in their configuration approach, embeddability, performance characteristics, community support, availability of advanced features, and suitability for different use cases. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the application being developed.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jetty, Apache Tomcat

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jetty
Jetty
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Full-featured and standards-based; Open source and commercially usable; Flexible and extensible; Small footprint; Embeddable; Asynchronous; Enterprise scalable; Dual licensed under Apache and Eclipse
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
Stacks
510
Stacks
16.9K
Followers
311
Followers
12.6K
Votes
47
Votes
201
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Very fast
  • 10
    Embeddable
  • 6
    Very thin
  • 6
    Scalable
Cons
  • 0
    Student
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up

What are some alternatives to Jetty, Apache Tomcat?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Caddy

Caddy

Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase