What are some alternatives to Join.me?

What is Join.me and what are its top alternatives?

Join.me is a popular online meeting and collaboration tool that allows users to host online meetings, share screens, video chat, and collaborate on documents in real-time. Key features of Join.me include easy screen sharing, customizable meeting links, integrated audio, and the ability to schedule and join meetings from any device. However, some limitations of Join.me include limited free features, lack of advanced collaboration tools, and occasional connection issues.

Zoom: Zoom is a widely-used video conferencing platform that offers features like HD video and audio, screen sharing, and virtual backgrounds. Pros of Zoom include a large participant limit, breakout rooms for collaboration, and integration with third-party apps. Cons include potential security concerns and limited meeting duration for free users.
GoToMeeting: GoToMeeting is a professional meeting tool that provides crystal clear audio and video quality, along with screen sharing and meeting recording capabilities. Pros of GoToMeeting include reliable performance, flexible pricing plans, and integration with Microsoft Office. Cons include a higher price point compared to some alternatives.
Cisco Webex: Cisco Webex is a secure and reliable video conferencing tool that offers features like HD video, screen sharing, and virtual backgrounds. Pros of Cisco Webex include end-to-end encryption, integration with popular apps like Microsoft Teams, and the ability to join meetings without downloading the app. Cons include occasional audio quality issues and a slightly complex interface.
Microsoft Teams: Microsoft Teams is a collaboration platform that includes video conferencing, chat, file sharing, and integration with Microsoft Office. Pros of Microsoft Teams include seamless integration with other Microsoft tools, advanced security features, and customization options. Cons include limited meeting recording capabilities and occasional performance issues during peak usage.
BlueJeans: BlueJeans is a video conferencing platform that offers high-quality video and audio, screen sharing, and real-time chat. Pros of BlueJeans include advanced features like Dolby Voice for crystal clear audio, integration with popular apps like Slack, and simple user interface. Cons include limited customization options and slightly higher pricing compared to some alternatives.
Google Meet: Google Meet is a video conferencing tool integrated within Google Workspace that offers features like screen sharing, real-time captions, and participant management. Pros of Google Meet include free unlimited meetings, easy integration with Gmail and Google Calendar, and automatic subtitles in multiple languages. Cons include limited features in the free version and occasional connectivity issues for some users.
Whereby: Whereby is a simple video conferencing tool that allows users to create virtual meeting rooms with a custom link. Pros of Whereby include no downloads required for participants, easy-to-use interface, and customizable branding options. Cons include limited meeting duration for free users and lack of advanced collaboration features.
Jitsi Meet: Jitsi Meet is an open-source video conferencing platform that offers end-to-end encryption, screen sharing, and recording capabilities. Pros of Jitsi Meet include free and open-source software, no account registration required, and support for large meetings. Cons include occasional performance issues with larger groups and limited customization options.
RingCentral Video: RingCentral Video is a comprehensive video conferencing tool that includes features like virtual backgrounds, team messaging, and calendar integrations. Pros of RingCentral Video include unlimited cloud storage for meeting recordings, support for up to 500 participants, and integration with popular productivity apps. Cons include a higher price point for larger organizations and learning curve for new users.
BigBlueButton: BigBlueButton is an open-source web conferencing system designed for online learning that offers features like real-time sharing of slides, video, and audio recording. Pros of BigBlueButton include integration with learning management systems, support for breakout rooms, and whiteboard capabilities. Cons include a steeper learning curve for new users and occasional technical glitches.

Top Alternatives to Join.me

Zoom
Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, and cross platform group chat into one easy-to-use platform. Our solution offers the best video, audio, and screen-sharing experience across Zoom Rooms, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and H.323/SIP room systems. ...
GoToMeeting
It is an online meeting, desktop sharing, and video conferencing software package that enables the user to meet with other computer users, customers, clients or colleagues via the Internet in real time. ...
Webex
Collaborate with colleagues across your organization, or halfway across the planet. Meet online and share files, information, and expertise. Collaborate from wherever you are with Webex mobile apps for IPhone, iPad, Android, or Blackberry. If you can get online, you can work together. ...
Skype
Skype’s text, voice and video make it simple to share experiences with the people that matter to you, wherever they are. ...
GoToWebinar
It is an online meeting, desktop sharing, and video conferencing software package that enables the user to meet with other computer users, customers, clients or colleagues via the Internet in real time. ...
TeamViewer
Its aproprietary software for remote control, desktop sharing, online meetings, web conferencing and file transfer between computers. ...
Slack
Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together. ...
Jira
Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster. ...

Join.me alternatives & related posts

Zoom

1.7K

155

Video Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen Sharing

Stacks1.7K

Votes155

PROS OF ZOOM

25
Web conferencing made easy
16
Remote control option
13
Draw on screen
12
Very reliable
11
In-meeting chat is pretty good
9
Free
9
Pair programming sessions with shared controls
8
Easy to share meeting links/invites
7
Good Sound Quality
6
Cloud recordings for meetings
5
Great mobile app
4
Virtual backgrounds
4
Recording Feature
4
Other people use it
4
User Friendly actions
2
Reactions (emoticons)
2
Auto reconnecting
2
Chrome extension is great to easily create meetings
2
While sharing screen, you can still see your video
2
Mute all participants at once
2
When ending the videocall, everybody gets kicked
2
Different options for blocking chat
1
Easily share video with audio
1
/zoom on Slack
1
Registration form
1
Meant for business and education
0
Zoom

CONS OF ZOOM

20
Limited time if you are a basic member
14
Limited Storage
11
Hate how sharing your screen defaults to Full Screen
10
Quality isn't great (Free)
9
No cursor highlight on screenshare.
8
Potential security flaws
7
Onboarding process for new users is not intuitive
5
Virtual background quality isn't good
5
Security
4
Editing can be improved
4
Doesn't handle switching audio sources well
4
The native calendar is buggy
4
Dashboard can be improved
3
Pornographic material displayed
3
Any body can get in it
3
Not many emojis
3
Past chat history is not saved
3
Recording Feature
3
En In reality,the chat in the meet not is excelent,noo
3
Zoom lags a lot

COMPARE

Compare Zoom vs Join.me

related Zoom posts

Yonas Beshawred

CEO at StackShare · Sep 12, 2018 | 14 upvotes · 468.3K views

Shared insights

Using Screenhero via Slack was getting to be pretty horrible. Video and sound quality was often times pretty bad and worst of all the service just wasn't reliable. We all had high hopes when the acquisition went through but ultimately, the product just didn't live up to expectations. We ended up trying Zoom after I had heard about it from some friends at other companies. We noticed the video/sound quality was better, and more importantly it was super reliable. The Slack integration was awesome (just type /zoom and it starts a call)

You can schedule recurring calls which is helpful. There's a G Suite (Google Calendar) integration which lets you add a Zoom call (w/dial in info + link to web/mobile) with the click of a button.

Meeting recordings (video and audio) are really nice, you get recordings stored in the cloud on the higher tier plans. One of our engineers, Jerome, actually built a cool little Slack integration using the Slack API and Zoom API so that every time a recording is processed, a link gets posted to the "event-recordings" channel. The iOS app is great too!

#WebAndVideoConferencing #videochat

Kerjohn Chen

Oct 3, 2020 | 13 upvotes · 1.6M views

Shared insights

Server side

We decided to use Python for our backend because it is one of the industry standard languages for data analysis and machine learning. It also has a lot of support due to its large user base.

Web Server: We chose Flask because we want to keep our machine learning / data analysis and the web server in the same language. Flask is easy to use and we all have experience with it. Postman will be used for creating and testing APIs due to its convenience.
Machine Learning: We decided to go with PyTorch for machine learning since it is one of the most popular libraries. It is also known to have an easier learning curve than other popular libraries such as Tensorflow. This is important because our team lacks ML experience and learning the tool as fast as possible would increase productivity.
Data Analysis: Some common Python libraries will be used to analyze our data. These include NumPy, Pandas , and matplotlib. These tools combined will help us learn the properties and characteristics of our data. Jupyter notebook will be used to help organize the data analysis process, and improve the code readability.

Client side

UI: We decided to use React for the UI because it helps organize the data and variables of the application into components, making it very convenient to maintain our dashboard. Since React is one of the most popular front end frameworks right now, there will be a lot of support for it as well as a lot of potential new hires that are familiar with the framework. CSS 3 and HTML5 will be used for the basic styling and structure of the web app, as they are the most widely used front end languages.
State Management: We decided to use Redux to manage the state of the application since it works naturally to React. Our team also already has experience working with Redux which gave it a slight edge over the other state management libraries.
Data Visualization: We decided to use the React-based library Victory to visualize the data. They have very user friendly documentation on their official website which we find easy to learn from.

Cache

Caching: We decided between Redis and memcached because they are two of the most popular open-source cache engines. We ultimately decided to use Redis to improve our web app performance mainly due to the extra functionalities it provides such as fine-tuning cache contents and durability.

Database

Database: We decided to use a NoSQL database over a relational database because of its flexibility from not having a predefined schema. The user behavior analytics has to be flexible since the data we plan to store may change frequently. We decided on MongoDB because it is lightweight and we can easily host the database with MongoDB Atlas . Everyone on our team also has experience working with MongoDB.

Infrastructure

Deployment: We decided to use Heroku over AWS, Azure, Google Cloud because it is free. Although there are advantages to the other cloud services, Heroku makes the most sense to our team because our primary goal is to build an MVP.

Other Tools

Communication Slack will be used as the primary source of communication. It provides all the features needed for basic discussions. In terms of more interactive meetings, Zoom will be used for its video calls and screen sharing capabilities.
Source Control The project will be stored on GitHub and all code changes will be done though pull requests. This will help us keep the codebase clean and make it easy to revert changes when we need to.