StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Java Tools
  5. JSTL vs Quarkus

JSTL vs Quarkus

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSTL
JSTL
Stacks25
Followers24
Votes0
Quarkus
Quarkus
Stacks311
Followers382
Votes80
GitHub Stars15.2K
Forks3.0K

JSTL vs Quarkus: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between JSTL (JavaServer Pages Standard Tag Library) and Quarkus.

  1. Performance: Quarkus, a microservices-oriented framework, is known for its excellent performance. It leverages techniques like ahead-of-time compilation and GraalVM to achieve fast startup times and low memory footprint. In contrast, JSTL does not directly impact performance as it is a tag library for JavaServer Pages (JSP) and mainly focuses on simplifying the presentation layer.

  2. Framework vs Tag Library: Quarkus is a full-fledged framework that provides a wide range of features and tools for developing and deploying Java applications. It offers dependency injection, reactive programming, and support for various frameworks and libraries. On the other hand, JSTL is a tag library that provides pre-defined tags for common tasks in JSP, such as iteration, conditional rendering, and formatting. It enhances the functionality of JSP pages but does not provide a complete framework like Quarkus.

  3. Technology Stack: Quarkus is built on top of popular technologies like Eclipse MicroProfile and GraalVM. It embraces a modern software stack that includes technologies like CDI (Contexts and Dependency Injection), Hibernate ORM, RESTEasy (JAX-RS implementation), and Apache Kafka. JSTL, being specific to JSP, is tightly integrated with Java Servlets and JSP technology and does not provide a wider technology stack like Quarkus.

  4. Runtime Environment: Quarkus is designed to run on multiple platforms and environments, including containers, Kubernetes, and serverless environments. It provides native image support, enabling efficient deployment and scaling. In contrast, JSTL runs within a Java web container or application server that supports JSP and Servlets. It does not have native image support and is not optimized for containerized deployments.

  5. Development Approach: Quarkus promotes a modern and agile development approach with features like live coding and hot-reloading, which enable developers to see the changes instantly without restarting the entire application. It also provides extensive tooling and developer-friendly APIs. JSTL, being focused on JSP, follows a traditional development approach where changes in JSP pages require redeploying the application for the changes to take effect.

  6. Scalability and Microservices: Quarkus is designed for building scalable microservices architectures. It offers features like reactive programming, fault tolerance, and clustering support. It also integrates well with other microservices-related technologies like OpenShift and Istio. JSTL, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for microservices-oriented features and primarily focuses on enhancing the presentation layer of traditional monolithic web applications.

In summary, Quarkus is a high-performance, feature-rich framework for building modern Java applications with support for various technologies and deployment options. JSTL, on the other hand, is a tag library that enhances the functionality of JSP pages but does not provide the extensive features and scalability options offered by Quarkus.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JSTL
JSTL
Quarkus
Quarkus

It has support for common, structural tasks such as iteration and conditionals, tags for manipulating XML documents, internationalization tags, and SQL tags. It also provides a framework for integrating the existing custom tags with the JSTL tags.

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

tags for manipulating XML documents; internationalization tags; SQL tags
CONTAINER FIRST; UNIFIES IMPERATIVE AND REACTIVE; BEST OF BREED LIBRARIES AND STANDARDS
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
15.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.0K
Stacks
25
Stacks
311
Followers
24
Followers
382
Votes
0
Votes
80
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 13
    Open source
  • 13
    Fast startup
  • 11
    Low memory footprint
  • 11
    Produce native code
  • 10
    Hot Reload
Cons
  • 2
    Boilerplate code when using Reflection
Integrations
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Java EE
Java EE
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Apache Camel
Apache Camel
Hibernate
Hibernate
Netty
Netty

What are some alternatives to JSTL, Quarkus?

MyBatis

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

guava

guava

The Guava project contains several of Google's core libraries that we rely on in our Java-based projects: collections, caching, primitives support, concurrency libraries, common annotations, string processing, I/O, and so forth.

Thymeleaf

Thymeleaf

It is a modern server-side Java template engine for both web and standalone environments. It is aimed at creating elegant web code while adding powerful features and retaining prototyping abilities.

JSF

JSF

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

JavaMelody

JavaMelody

It is used to monitor Java or Java EE application servers in QA and production environments. It is not a tool to simulate requests from users, it is a tool to measure and calculate statistics on real operation of an application depending on the usage of the application by users. It is mainly based on statistics of requests and on evolution charts.

RxJava

RxJava

A library for composing asynchronous and event-based programs by using observable sequences for the Java VM.

MapStruct

MapStruct

It is a code generator that greatly simplifies the implementation of mappings between Java bean types based on a convention over configuration approach. The generated mapping code uses plain method invocations and thus is fast, type-safe and easy to understand.

Java 8

Java 8

It is a revolutionary release of the world’s no 1 development platform. It includes a huge upgrade to the Java programming model and a coordinated evolution of the JVM, Java language, and libraries. Java 8 includes features for productivity, ease of use, improved polyglot programming, security and improved performance.

Apache FreeMarker

Apache FreeMarker

It is a "template engine"; a generic tool to generate text output (anything from HTML to auto generated source code) based on templates. It's a Java package, a class library for Java programmers.

Jackson

Jackson

It is a suite of data-processing tools for Java (and the JVM platform), including the flagship streaming JSON parser / generator library, matching data-binding library (POJOs to and from JSON) and additional data format modules to process data encoded in Avro, BSON, CBOR, CSV, Smile, (Java) Properties, Protobuf, XML or YAML; and even the large set of data format modules to support data types of widely used data types such as Guava, Joda.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase