StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtualization Platform
  5. KVM vs Proxmox VE

KVM vs Proxmox VE

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

KVM
KVM
Stacks189
Followers234
Votes8
Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE
Stacks353
Followers334
Votes41

KVM vs Proxmox VE: What are the differences?

KVM and Proxmox VE are both open-source virtualization solutions that offer different features and functionality. Here are the key differences between the two:

  1. Architecture: KVM is a kernel-based virtual machine hypervisor that is built into the Linux kernel. It leverages the features of the host operating system to provide hardware virtualization. Proxmox VE, on the other hand, is a complete virtualization management solution that combines KVM and container-based virtualization technologies.

  2. User Interface: Proxmox VE provides a web-based user interface that allows users to manage virtual machines, containers, storage, and networking resources from a centralized dashboard. KVM, on the other hand, does not provide a built-in user interface and requires users to interact with it through command-line tools or third-party management tools.

  3. High Availability: Proxmox VE includes built-in high availability features that allow virtual machines and containers to be automatically migrated to other nodes in the cluster in the event of a hardware failure. KVM does not provide built-in high availability and requires additional configuration and setup to achieve similar functionality.

  4. Community and Support: Both KVM and Proxmox VE have active communities and provide support through forums, documentation, and community-driven resources. However, Proxmox VE offers additional commercial support options and enterprise features for users who require professional assistance.

  5. VM Snapshots: Proxmox VE supports creating snapshots of virtual machines, allowing users to capture the state of a virtual machine at a specific point in time and roll back to that state if needed. KVM does not have built-in snapshot capabilities and requires manual management of disk images for similar functionality.

  6. Networking: Proxmox VE includes advanced networking features, such as VLAN tagging, bridged networking, and software-defined networking (SDN) capabilities. KVM also supports these features but requires additional configuration and setup.

In summary, KVM and Proxmox VE differ in their architecture, user interface, high availability features, support options, snapshot capabilities, and networking capabilities. While KVM is a kernel-based virtual machine hypervisor, Proxmox VE provides a complete virtualization management solution that combines KVM and container-based virtualization technologies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

KVM
KVM
Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

Statistics
Stacks
189
Stacks
353
Followers
234
Followers
334
Votes
8
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    No license issues
  • 2
    Flexible network options
  • 2
    Very fast
Pros
  • 9
    HA VM & LXC devices
  • 8
    Ease of use
  • 7
    Robust architecture
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    Avoid vendor lock-in

What are some alternatives to KVM, Proxmox VE?

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

VMware vSphere

VMware vSphere

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

Qemu

Qemu

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Parallels

Parallels

It is an application and desktop virtualization software vendor that offers management and delivery platforms for Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows desktop deployments.

VMware Fusion

VMware Fusion

It gives Mac users the power to run Windows on Mac along with hundreds of other operating systems side by side with Mac applications, without rebooting. It is simple enough for home users and powerful enough for IT professionals, developers and businesses.

Xen

Xen

It is a hypervisor using a microkernel design, providing services that allow multiple computer operating systems to execute on the same computer hardware concurrently. It was developed by the Linux Foundation and is supported by Intel.

VMware vSAN

VMware vSAN

It is enterprise-class, storage virtualization software that, when combined with vSphere, allows you to manage compute and storage with a single platform. You can reduce the cost and complexity of traditional storage and take the easiest path to hyperconverged infrastructure and hybrid cloud. Evolve to an integrated hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solution with vSAN to improve business agility, all while speeding operations and lowering costs.

Oracle VM Server

Oracle VM Server

It is a zero license cost server virtualization and management solution that makes enterprise applications easier to deploy, manage, and support. Backed worldwide by affordable enterprise-quality support for both Oracle and non-Oracle environments, it reduces operations and support costs while increasing IT efficiency and agility.

Virtuozzo

Virtuozzo

It is an operating system-level server virtualization solution designed to centralize server management and consolidate workloads, which reduces overhead by reducing the number of physical servers required. Organizations use it for server consolidation, disaster recovery, and server workload agility.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana