StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Leaf PHP vs TypeORM

Leaf PHP vs TypeORM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TypeORM
TypeORM
Stacks756
Followers813
Votes81
GitHub Stars36.0K
Forks6.5K
Leaf PHP
Leaf PHP
Stacks4
Followers22
Votes20
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks70

Leaf PHP vs TypeORM: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between Leaf PHP and TypeORM. Both Leaf PHP and TypeORM are popular frameworks used in web development. However, they differ in several important aspects. Let's explore these differences.

  1. Architecture: Leaf PHP follows a lightweight and minimalistic architectural pattern, which makes it easier to understand and work with. On the other hand, TypeORM follows the Active Record pattern, which allows for more flexibility and convenience in manipulating database records.

  2. Language Support: Leaf PHP is primarily written in PHP and is specifically designed for PHP web development. It provides extensive support for PHP features and functionalities. In contrast, TypeORM is written in TypeScript and can be used with multiple programming languages, including JavaScript, TypeScript, and Node.js.

  3. ORM Features: TypeORM is a full-featured Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) library that provides advanced features like eager loading, cascading saves and deletes, and automatic migrations. These features make it easier to work with databases and manage data relationships. Leaf PHP, while not being a full ORM, provides simple database access and query building functionalities.

  4. Database Support: TypeORM supports a wide range of databases, including PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite, SQL Server, Oracle, and others. It provides seamless integration with different database systems. On the other hand, Leaf PHP supports MySQL and SQLite by default, but it can be extended to work with other databases through custom integrations.

  5. Community and Documentation: TypeORM has a large and active community of developers who contribute to its development and provide support. It has comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and examples that make it easy for developers to get started. Leaf PHP also has a community and documentation, but it is relatively smaller compared to TypeORM.

  6. Maturity and Popularity: TypeORM is a more mature and widely used framework, with a larger user base and more adoption in production projects. It has been around for several years and has gained a reputation for its stability and reliability. Leaf PHP, while being a capable framework, is less popular and may not have the same level of maturity and community support as TypeORM.

In summary, Leaf PHP and TypeORM differ in their architectural patterns, language support, ORM features, database support, community and documentation, as well as their maturity and popularity in the web development community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TypeORM
TypeORM
Leaf PHP
Leaf PHP

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

It is a PHP micro-framework which helps you create web applications and APIs from the ground up in minutes. It gives you a particular structure to follow whiles maintaining PHP's freedom.

automatically create the database table schemes based on your models; transparently insert / update / delete to the database your objects; map your selections from tables to JavaScript objects and map table columns to object properties; easily create one-to-one, many-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many relations between tables; and much more.
Quickly Create PHP Projects; Structured PHP; Simple PHP methods; Clean, Fast, Reliable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
36.0K
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
6.5K
GitHub Forks
70
Stacks
756
Stacks
4
Followers
813
Followers
22
Votes
81
Votes
20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 30
    Typescript
  • 12
    Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Ser
  • 9
    Cons of TypeORM
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 7
    Promise Based
Cons
  • 5
    Completely abandoned by its creator
  • 3
    Too complex for what it does
  • 2
    Doesn't really support native javascript
  • 1
    Not proper/real type safety
  • 1
    Cannot use query on any relation
Pros
  • 1
    Easy to Learn
  • 1
    API's Load 5x Faster Than Bigger PHP Frameworks
  • 1
    MVC Support
  • 1
    Supports Migrations
  • 1
    ORM

What are some alternatives to TypeORM, Leaf PHP?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase