StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Development & Training Tools
  4. Machine Learning Tools
  5. Lobe vs PyTorch

Lobe vs PyTorch

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PyTorch
PyTorch
Stacks1.6K
Followers1.5K
Votes43
GitHub Stars94.7K
Forks25.8K
Lobe
Lobe
Stacks1
Followers18
Votes0

Lobe vs PyTorch: What are the differences?

  1. User Interface: Lobe is focused on providing a user-friendly, visual interface that allows users to easily build machine learning models without requiring a deep understanding of coding or complex algorithms. On the other hand, PyTorch is a powerful deep learning framework that provides more control and flexibility to experienced users who want to customize their models at a lower level.

  2. Deployment: Lobe simplifies the deployment process by providing easy options to export and deploy models to various platforms, including mobile devices and the web, with just a few clicks. PyTorch, on the other hand, requires users to handle the deployment process manually, which may involve writing additional code and configuration settings to optimize performance on different platforms.

  3. Model Complexity: Lobe is designed for users who want to quickly create simple machine learning models without delving too deep into the intricacies of neural networks and optimization algorithms. In contrast, PyTorch offers more advanced features and capabilities for building complex models with greater control over every aspect of the neural network architecture.

  4. Support and Documentation: Lobe provides comprehensive documentation and tutorials tailored for beginners and non-experts to help them understand the basics of machine learning and model building. PyTorch, on the other hand, has a vast community of developers and researchers who contribute to the framework's extensive documentation, tutorials, and online forums for advanced users seeking in-depth technical guidance.

  5. Interoperability: Lobe focuses on seamless integration with popular tools and platforms, such as TensorFlow Lite, Core ML, and ONNX, to ensure cross-platform compatibility for deploying models. PyTorch, on the other hand, has a strong focus on interoperability with other deep learning frameworks, libraries, and tools, enabling users to leverage a wide range of resources and technologies for their projects.

  6. Performance and Optimization: Lobe is optimized for ease of use and quick prototyping, sacrificing some performance optimizations and low-level customization options available in PyTorch. Experienced users who require fine-tuning and optimization for specific tasks may prefer PyTorch for its performance capabilities and extensive features for model optimization and deployment.

In Summary, Lobe prioritizes a user-friendly interface and quick model development, while PyTorch offers advanced capabilities, flexibility, and control for experienced users requiring more customization and optimization in their machine learning projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on PyTorch, Lobe

Xi
Xi

Developer at DCSIL

Oct 11, 2020

Decided

For data analysis, we choose a Python-based framework because of Python's simplicity as well as its large community and available supporting tools. We choose PyTorch over TensorFlow for our machine learning library because it has a flatter learning curve and it is easy to debug, in addition to the fact that our team has some existing experience with PyTorch. Numpy is used for data processing because of its user-friendliness, efficiency, and integration with other tools we have chosen. Finally, we decide to include Anaconda in our dev process because of its simple setup process to provide sufficient data science environment for our purposes. The trained model then gets deployed to the back end as a pickle.

99.3k views99.3k
Comments
Adithya
Adithya

Student at PES UNIVERSITY

May 11, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning some basic machine learning concepts. So which of the following frameworks is better to use: Keras / TensorFlow/PyTorch. I have prior knowledge in python(and even pandas), java, js and C. It would be nice if something could point out the advantages of one over the other especially in terms of resources, documentation and flexibility. Also, could someone tell me where to find the right resources or tutorials for the above frameworks? Thanks in advance, hope you are doing well!!

107k views107k
Comments
cfvedova
cfvedova

Oct 10, 2020

Decided

A large part of our product is training and using a machine learning model. As such, we chose one of the best coding languages, Python, for machine learning. This coding language has many packages which help build and integrate ML models. For the main portion of the machine learning, we chose PyTorch as it is one of the highest quality ML packages for Python. PyTorch allows for extreme creativity with your models while not being too complex. Also, we chose to include scikit-learn as it contains many useful functions and models which can be quickly deployed. Scikit-learn is perfect for testing models, but it does not have as much flexibility as PyTorch. We also include NumPy and Pandas as these are wonderful Python packages for data manipulation. Also for testing models and depicting data, we have chosen to use Matplotlib and seaborn, a package which creates very good looking plots. Matplotlib is the standard for displaying data in Python and ML. Whereas, seaborn is a package built on top of Matplotlib which creates very visually pleasing plots.

72.8k views72.8k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

PyTorch
PyTorch
Lobe
Lobe

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

An easy-to-use visual tool that lets you build custom deep learning models, quickly train them, and ship them directly in your app without writing any code.

Tensor computation (like numpy) with strong GPU acceleration;Deep Neural Networks built on a tape-based autograd system
Build - Drag in your training data and Lobe automatically builds you a custom deep learning model. Then refine your model by adjusting settings and connecting pre-trained building blocks.; Train - Monitor training progress in real-time with interactive charts and test results that update live as your model improves. Cloud training lets you get results quickly, without slowing down your computer.; Ship - Export your trained model to TensorFlow or CoreML and run it directly in your app on iOS and Android. Or use the easy-to-use Lobe Developer API and run your model remotely over the air.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
94.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
25.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
1
Followers
1.5K
Followers
18
Votes
43
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Easy to use
  • 11
    Developer Friendly
  • 10
    Easy to debug
  • 7
    Sometimes faster than TensorFlow
Cons
  • 3
    Lots of code
  • 1
    It eats poop
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Python
Python
TensorFlow
TensorFlow
Keras
Keras

What are some alternatives to PyTorch, Lobe?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

scikit-learn

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

Keras

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

H2O

H2O

H2O.ai is the maker behind H2O, the leading open source machine learning platform for smarter applications and data products. H2O operationalizes data science by developing and deploying algorithms and models for R, Python and the Sparkling Water API for Spark.

PredictionIO

PredictionIO

PredictionIO is an open source machine learning server for software developers to create predictive features, such as personalization, recommendation and content discovery.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope