StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. Lodash vs Luxon

Lodash vs Luxon

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Lodash
Lodash
Stacks10.7K
Followers886
Votes3
GitHub Stars61.3K
Forks7.1K
Luxon
Luxon
Stacks215
Followers23
Votes3
GitHub Stars16.2K
Forks768

Lodash vs Luxon: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Lodash and Luxon. Lodash is a JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions to manipulate arrays, objects, and other data types. On the other hand, Luxon is a library focused on date and time manipulation and formatting.

  1. Functionalities: Lodash offers an extensive set of utilities for general-purpose programming tasks, including array manipulation, object iteration, data filtering, and more. Luxon, on the other hand, specifically focuses on date and time operations, providing powerful features like date parsing, time zone handling, formatting, and interval calculations.

  2. Usage: Lodash is commonly used for various tasks in web development as it provides a convenient way to perform common operations with arrays and objects. It is widely adopted and integrates well with other popular JavaScript frameworks and libraries. On the contrary, Luxon is primarily used for handling date and time-related operations in applications that heavily rely on accurate time representation, such as scheduling, calendars, or event management systems.

  3. Documentation and Community: Lodash has a well-documented API with a large and active community of developers. It provides comprehensive examples and guides, making it easier for developers to understand and utilize its functionalities. Luxon also has good documentation, although its community may be smaller compared to Lodash due to its narrower focus.

  4. Performance: Lodash is known for its performance optimizations, providing efficient implementations for common tasks like sorting, filtering, and iterating arrays. It is designed to be fast and optimized for large datasets. Luxon, being a specialized library for date and time operations, also emphasizes performance, but its optimizations are tailored to the specific requirements of handling time-related calculations and formatting.

  5. Dependencies: Lodash can be used with or without other libraries, as it provides standalone functions for various operations. It has a small footprint and can be easily included in projects where additional functionality is needed. Luxon, on the other hand, has minimal external dependencies and can be used as a standalone library for date and time operations.

  6. Browser and Environment Support: Lodash aims for wide browser compatibility and provides support for older JavaScript environments. It can be used in browsers, Node.js, and other JavaScript runtime environments. Luxon is also compatible with modern browsers and Node.js, but being more specific to date and time operations, it may have certain features or requirements that are specific to the handling of time zones or calendar systems.

In summary, Lodash is a general-purpose utility library with a wide range of functions for array and object manipulation, while Luxon is a specialized library specifically focused on date and time handling, providing features like parsing, formatting, and time zone support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Lodash, Luxon

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.3k views38.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Lodash
Lodash
Luxon
Luxon

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

-
DateTime, Duration, and Interval types; Immutable, chainable, unambiguous API; Parsing and formatting for common and custom formats; Native time zone and Intl support (no locale or tz files)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
61.3K
GitHub Stars
16.2K
GitHub Forks
7.1K
GitHub Forks
768
Stacks
10.7K
Stacks
215
Followers
886
Followers
23
Votes
3
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Better than Underscore
  • 1
    Simple
  • 0
    Better that Underscore
Cons
  • 1
    It reduce the performance
Pros
  • 3
    It's a smaller import, and more modern than Moment.
Cons
  • 2
    It has a smaller community than moment
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
TypeScript
TypeScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
ES6
ES6
React Native
React Native
RequireJS
RequireJS
System.js
System.js

What are some alternatives to Lodash, Luxon?

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Ramda

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Prepack

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Cesium

Cesium

it is used to create the leading web-based globe and map for visualizing dynamic data. We strive for the best possible performance, precision, visual quality, ease of use, platform support, and content.

Factor

Factor

It is an extension-focused and universal Vue.js platform for professional front-end developers. It will help you launch apps that impress and astonish your clients and colleagues. No more re-inventing the wheel, or rewriting and refactoring where it's unneeded.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase