What is Micro and what are its top alternatives?
Micro is a terminal-based text editor that aims to be easy to use and highly customizable. It boasts features like multiple cursors, mouse support, syntax highlighting, and a plugin system for extending its functionality. However, some limitations of Micro include a lack of advanced features compared to other text editors and a smaller user base, which can result in a limited pool of community-created plugins and support resources available.
NeoVim: NeoVim is an improved version of the popular Vim text editor, offering better performance and extensibility. Key features include asynchronous plugin execution, built-in support for terminals and job control, and a powerful plugin ecosystem. Pros include advanced editing capabilities and a large community, but cons may include a steep learning curve for newcomers.
Visual Studio Code: Visual Studio Code is a versatile code editor with built-in debugging, version control, and IntelliSense code completion. Key features include a marketplace with thousands of extensions, a command palette for quick access to functions, and support for multiple programming languages. Pros include a rich feature set and active development, but cons may include a higher system resource usage compared to Micro.
Sublime Text: Sublime Text is a sophisticated text editor for code, markup, and prose. Key features include a distraction-free mode, multiple selections, and a powerful Python-based plugin API. Pros include a fast and responsive user interface and a large community contributing plugins, but cons may include a lack of free updates and a closed-source nature.
Emacs: Emacs is a highly customizable text editor with support for a wide range of programming languages and operating systems. Key features include a powerful Lisp-based extension language, built-in documentation, and a rich set of third-party packages. Pros include unparalleled extensibility and integration with other tools, but cons may include a steep learning curve and a non-standard keybinding scheme.
Atom: Atom is a hackable text editor for the 21st century, built on the Electron framework. Key features include a built-in package manager, smart autocompletion, and Teletype for collaborative editing. Pros include a modern user interface and active community development, but cons may include performance issues with large files and a higher memory footprint compared to Micro.
VS Codium: VS Codium is a community-driven, open-source build of Visual Studio Code without the Microsoft branding or telemetry. Key features are similar to Visual Studio Code, including a feature-rich editor and extensive extension marketplace. Pros include a commitment to privacy and data collection transparency, but cons may include potential differences in feature updates compared to the official Visual Studio Code.
Kakoune: Kakoune is a modal text editor inspired by Vim, designed for intuitive editing of code and text. Key features include multiple selections, interactive selections, and a client-server architecture. Pros include a focus on efficient text manipulation and a clear design philosophy, but cons may include limited plugin ecosystem compared to more established editors.
Textadept: Textadept is a fast and minimalist text editor with Lua scripting support. Key features include a command mode for text manipulation, a file browser, and built-in support for over 60 programming languages. Pros include speed and extensibility through scripting, but cons may include a lack of a graphical user interface by default.
Brackets: Brackets is a lightweight, open-source code editor for web development, built using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Key features include live preview, preprocessor support, and visual tools for debugging and profiling. Pros include a focus on front-end development workflows and an active extension ecosystem, but cons may include limited support for non-web programming languages.
Vim: Vim is a highly configurable, powerful text editor optimized for editing code. Key features include modal editing, extensibility through plugins and scripting, and efficient editing commands. Pros include speed and efficiency for advanced users, but cons may include a steep learning curve and a somewhat dated user interface compared to more modern editors.
Top Alternatives to Micro
- Istio
Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc. ...
- Zuul
It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture. ...
- Jersey
It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development. ...
- linkerd
linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing. ...
- Azure Service Fabric
Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps. ...
- Dapr
It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks. ...
- Ocelot
It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service. ...
- Netflix OSS
It provides tools and services to get the most out of your (big) data. It also provides runtime containers, libraries and services that power microservices. ...
Micro alternatives & related posts
Istio
- Zero code for logging and monitoring14
- Service Mesh9
- Great flexibility8
- Resiliency5
- Powerful authorization mechanisms5
- Ingress controller5
- Easy integration with Kubernetes and Docker4
- Full Security4
- Performance16
related Istio posts
At my company, we are trying to move away from a monolith into microservices led architecture. We are now stuck with a problem to establish a communication mechanism between microservices. Since, we are planning to use service meshes and something like Dapr/Istio, we are not sure on how to split services between the two. Service meshes offer Traffic Routing or Splitting whereas, Dapr can offer state management and service-service invocation. At the same time both of them provide mLTS, Metrics, Resiliency and tracing. How to choose who should offer what?
As for the new support of service mesh pattern by Kong, I wonder how does it compare to Istio?
Zuul
related Zuul posts
- Lightweight4
- Fast Performance With Microservices1
- Java standard1
related Jersey posts
- CNCF Project3
- Service Mesh1
- Fast Integration1
- Pre-check permissions1
- Light Weight1
related linkerd posts
Azure Service Fabric
- Intelligent, fast, reliable5
- Runs most of Azure core services4
- Reliability3
- Superior programming models3
- More reliable than Kubernetes3
- Open source3
- Quickest recovery and healing in the world2
- Deploy anywhere1
- Is data storage technology1
- Battle hardened in Azure > 10 Years1
related Azure Service Fabric posts
- Manage inter-service state3
- MTLS "for free"2
- App dashboard for rapid log overview2
- Zipkin app tracing "for free"2
- Additional overhead1
related Dapr posts
At my company, we are trying to move away from a monolith into microservices led architecture. We are now stuck with a problem to establish a communication mechanism between microservices. Since, we are planning to use service meshes and something like Dapr/Istio, we are not sure on how to split services between the two. Service meshes offer Traffic Routing or Splitting whereas, Dapr can offer state management and service-service invocation. At the same time both of them provide mLTS, Metrics, Resiliency and tracing. How to choose who should offer what?
- Straightforward documentation1
- Simple configuration1