StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Micro vs Ocelot

Micro vs Ocelot

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Micro
Micro
Stacks89
Followers55
Votes2
Ocelot
Ocelot
Stacks83
Followers283
Votes4
GitHub Stars8.6K
Forks1.7K

Micro vs Ocelot: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Micro and Ocelot are two popular API gateways that provide different functionalities and features. In this comparison, we will highlight key differences between these two solutions.

1. **Protocol Support**: Micro primarily supports gRPC, HTTP, and WebSockets for communication between services, while Ocelot focuses primarily on HTTP-based protocols such as REST and GraphQL.
2. **Programming Language Support**: Micro is language-agnostic and supports multiple programming languages, making it more versatile for different development teams. On the other hand, Ocelot is primarily focused on the .NET ecosystem, limiting its usability for teams using different programming languages.
3. **Routing and Load Balancing**: Ocelot provides more advanced routing capabilities, allowing for greater flexibility in defining routing rules and load balancing configurations. Micro, while versatile, may lack some of the advanced routing features compared to Ocelot.
4. **Plugin Ecosystem**: Ocelot has a well-defined plugin ecosystem that allows for easy extensibility and customization of its features. Micro, on the other hand, may have a smaller community of plugins and extensions available.
5. **Configuration and Management**: Micro emphasizes simplicity and ease of use in its configuration and management, making it more suitable for smaller projects or teams with limited DevOps resources. Ocelot, being more feature-rich, may require more effort in configuration and management.
6. **Scalability and Performance**: Both Micro and Ocelot are designed for scalability, but Micro may have a slight edge in terms of performance due to its lightweight design and focus on microservices architecture.

In Summary, Micro and Ocelot have distinct differences in protocol support, programming language support, routing capabilities, plugin ecosystem, configuration management, and scalability/performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Micro
Micro
Ocelot
Ocelot

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

Authentication; Config Management; Key-Value Storage; API Gateway; Service Discovery; Event Streaming
Routing; Request Aggregation; Service Discovery with Consul & Eureka; Service Fabric; Kubernetes; WebSockets; Authentication; Authorisation; Rate Limiting; Caching
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
89
Stacks
83
Followers
55
Followers
283
Votes
2
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Great flexibility
  • 1
    Nice tooling
Pros
  • 2
    Straightforward documentation
  • 2
    Simple configuration
Integrations
No integrations available
GraphQL
GraphQL
.NET
.NET
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
.NET Core
.NET Core

What are some alternatives to Micro, Ocelot?

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Express Gateway

Express Gateway

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

linkerd

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Claudia

Claudia

Claudia helps you deploy Node.js microservices to Amazon Web Services easily. It automates and simplifies deployment workflows and error prone tasks, so you can focus on important problems and not have to worry about AWS service quirks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana