StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Static Site Generators
  5. MkDocs vs Octopress

MkDocs vs Octopress

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Octopress
Octopress
Stacks45
Followers48
Votes0
GitHub Stars9.3K
Forks2.6K
MkDocs
MkDocs
Stacks167
Followers152
Votes14

MkDocs vs Octopress: What are the differences?

Comparison of MkDocs and Octopress

MkDocs and Octopress are both static site generators that allow users to create websites from plain text files, but they have several key differences:

  1. Language and Framework: MkDocs is written in Python and uses the Material Design theme, while Octopress is built on Ruby and employs the Liquid templating system for customization.

  2. Community Support and Documentation: MkDocs has a larger and more active community, providing comprehensive documentation and numerous plugins, whereas Octopress has a smaller user base and limited resources for troubleshooting and development.

  3. Ease of Use: MkDocs is known for its simplicity and intuitive configuration, making it easier for beginners to create and deploy websites quickly. In comparison, Octopress can have a steeper learning curve due to its complex setup and customization options.

  4. Flexibility and Customization: Octopress offers more flexibility in design and layout customization through its extensive range of themes and plugins, while MkDocs has fewer options for personalized styling but focuses more on clean, modern designs by default.

  5. Speed and Performance: MkDocs is known for its fast build times and efficient rendering of content, resulting in quick loading websites, whereas Octopress may require more time to process and generate pages, leading to potentially slower performance.

  6. Version Control Integration: MkDocs has seamless integration with version control systems like Git, facilitating collaborative development and easy deployment processes, whereas Octopress may require additional configuration for efficient version control management.

In summary, MkDocs excels in simplicity, community support, and speed, while Octopress offers greater customization options and flexibility in design but may require a higher learning curve and slower performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Octopress
Octopress
MkDocs
MkDocs

Octopress is an obsessively designed framework for Jekyll blogging. It’s easy to configure and easy to deploy.

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Octopress sports a clean responsive theme written in semantic HTML5, focused on readability and friendliness toward mobile devices.;Code blogging is easy and beautiful. Embed code (with Solarized styling) in your posts from gists, jsFiddle or from your filesystem.;Third party integration is simple with built-in support for Pinboard, Delicious, GitHub Repositories, Disqus Comments and Google Analytics.;It's easy to use. A collection of rake tasks simplifies development and makes deploying a cinch.;Ships with great plug-ins some original and others from the Jekyll community — tested and improved.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
45
Stacks
167
Followers
48
Followers
152
Votes
0
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Gitlab integration
  • 3
    Extensibility
  • 2
    Themes
Cons
  • 1
    Build time increases exponentially as site grows

What are some alternatives to Octopress, MkDocs?

Jekyll

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Hugo

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Hexo

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

Sphinx

Sphinx

It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server.

Pelican

Pelican

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

DocPad

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope