StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. State Management Library
  5. MobX vs Zustand

MobX vs Zustand

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MobX
MobX
Stacks847
Followers516
Votes114
GitHub Stars28.1K
Forks1.8K
Zustand
Zustand
Stacks371
Followers157
Votes34

MobX vs Zustand: What are the differences?

MobX and Zustand are both state management libraries for JavaScript applications. Let's explore the key differences between the two.

  1. API Complexity: MobX provides a more advanced and complex API compared to Zustand. It offers a wide range of features such as observables, computed values, and actions, which allow fine-grained control over the state management process. In contrast, Zustand focuses on simplicity and provides a minimalistic API, making it easier for developers to understand and use.

  2. Performance Optimization: MobX has built-in optimizations like dependency tracking and automatic re-rendering of components when the underlying state changes. It leverages a reactive programming model to efficiently update only the necessary components. Zustand, on the other hand, provides a simpler approach without such optimizations. While it may not offer the same level of built-in performance enhancements, it still performs well and is suitable for smaller applications.

  3. Integration: MobX is designed to integrate seamlessly with various frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue. It has official bindings for these frameworks, which provide additional features and make it easy to incorporate MobX into existing projects. On the other hand, Zustand is framework-agnostic, which means it can be used with any JavaScript framework or library. It provides a lightweight solution that can easily blend into different project setups.

  4. Developer Experience: MobX has a larger community and more extensive documentation compared to Zustand. This means that developers using MobX may find it easier to get support and find resources to learn from. Zustand, being relatively newer and with a smaller community, may have a more limited set of available resources and support channels. However, this can also be seen as an advantage for Zustand, as it offers a more focused and streamlined approach.

  5. Backward Compatibility: MobX has been around for a longer time and has a stable version history. It supports older versions of JavaScript and is compatible with a wide range of browsers. Zustand, being a newer library, may have fewer backward compatibility guarantees and may require the use of modern JavaScript language features and recent browser versions.

  6. Package Size: MobX has a larger package size compared to Zustand. This is mainly due to the additional features and optimizations it offers. Zustand, being a minimalist library, has a smaller package size, which can be advantageous for projects with tight constraints on file size or performance.

In summary, MobX provides a more advanced API, has built-in performance optimizations, offers easy integration with popular frameworks, has a larger community and documentation, supports backward compatibility, and has a larger package size. On the other hand, Zustand focuses on simplicity, performs well without extensive optimizations, is framework-agnostic, has a smaller community and documentation, may have fewer backward compatibility guarantees, and has a smaller package size.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

MobX
MobX
Zustand
Zustand

MobX is a battle tested library that makes state management simple and scalable by transparently applying functional reactive programming (TFRP). React and MobX together are a powerful combination. React renders the application state by providing mechanisms to translate it into a tree of renderable components. MobX provides the mechanism to store and update the application state that React then uses.

Small, fast and scaleable bearbones state-management solution. Has a comfy api based on hooks, that isn't boilerplatey or opinionated, but still just enough to be explicit and flux-like.

-
Simpler and un-opinionated; Makes hooks the primary means of consuming state; Doesn't wrap your app into context providers; Can inform components transiently (without causing render)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
847
Stacks
371
Followers
516
Followers
157
Votes
114
Votes
34
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    It's just stupidly simple, yet so magical
  • 18
    Easier and cleaner than Redux
  • 15
    Fast
  • 13
    React integration
  • 13
    Automagic updates
Cons
  • 1
    Maturity
Pros
  • 10
    Simple API
  • 7
    Unopinionated
  • 5
    Asynchronous action out the box
  • 4
    Supports Redux DevTools
  • 3
    Open source
Cons
  • 2
    Requires function component
Integrations
React
React
React
React

What are some alternatives to MobX, Zustand?

Redux

Redux

It helps you write applications that behave consistently, run in different environments (client, server, and native), and are easy to test. t provides a great experience, such as live code editing combined with a time traveling debugger.

Effector

Effector

It is an effective multi-store state manager for Javascript apps, that allows you to manage data in complex applications.

redux-saga

redux-saga

An alternative side effect model for Redux apps

vuex

vuex

Vuex is a state management pattern + library for Vue.js applications. It serves as a centralized store for all the components in an application, with rules ensuring that the state can only be mutated in a predictable fashion. It also integrates with Vue's official devtools extension to provide advanced features such as zero-config time-travel debugging and state snapshot export / import.

redux-thunk

redux-thunk

Redux Thunk middleware allows you to write action creators that return a function instead of an action. The thunk can be used to delay the dispatch of an action, or to dispatch only if a certain condition is met. The inner function receives the store methods dispatch and getState as parameters.

Statsbot

Statsbot

Statsbot is helping you take control of your raw data, providing an all-in-one analysis tool for engineers and non-tech folks alike.

Unstated

Unstated

State so simple, it goes without saying

digna

digna

Is the game-changing European modern data quality platform that effortlessly uncovers anomalies and errors in your data with Artificial Intelligence.

reselect

reselect

Simple “selector” library for Redux (and others) inspired by getters in NuclearJS, subscriptions in re-frame and this proposal from speedskater.

Redux Observable

Redux Observable

It allows developers to dispatch a function that returns an observable, promise or iterable of action(s). Compose and cancel async actions to create side effects and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase