Mono vs Spring Framework

Overview

Spring Framework

Stacks6.5K

Followers886

Votes0

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

Mono

Stacks94

Followers59

Votes1

GitHub Stars11.4K

Forks3.8K

Mono vs Spring Framework: What are the differences?

Language Compatibility: Mono is a cross-platform implementation of the .NET Framework, allowing developers to write applications in C# and run them on various platforms, including Linux and macOS. In contrast, Spring Framework is primarily used with Java and supports JVM-based languages, making it suitable for Java development.
Architecture: Mono focuses on providing a runtime environment for executing .NET applications, while Spring Framework offers a comprehensive set of libraries and tools for building enterprise Java applications. Spring emphasizes modular design and dependency injection, promoting best practices for developing robust and scalable applications.
Community Support: Mono has a smaller community compared to the Spring Framework, which benefits from a large and active user base contributing to its development and maintenance. This difference can impact the availability of resources, documentation, and third-party integrations for each framework.
Platform-Specific Features: Mono enables developers to target specific platforms by providing platform-specific APIs and libraries, enhancing interoperability with native code. On the other hand, Spring Framework abstracts away platform-specific details, promoting portability and ensuring consistent behavior across different environments.
Deployment Options: Mono applications can be deployed as standalone executables, simplifying distribution and installation for end-users. In contrast, Spring Framework applications are typically deployed as WAR files on Java application servers, allowing for more advanced deployment configurations and management options.
Innovation and Adaptability: Spring Framework is known for its continuous evolution and adaptation to new trends in software development, embracing modern practices such as reactive programming and microservices architecture. Mono, while providing cross-platform compatibility, may have limitations in terms of adopting cutting-edge technologies.

In Summary, Mono and Spring Framework differ in language compatibility, architecture focus, community support, platform-specific features, deployment options, and innovation/adaptability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Spring Framework, Mono

juan9222

Jul 25, 2020

Needs advice

Hi there, I'm deciding the technology to use in my project.

I need to build software that has:

Login
Register
Main View (access to a user account, News, General Info, Business hours, software, and parts section).
Account Preferences.
Web Shop for Parts (Support, Download Sections, Ticket System).

The most critical functionality is a WebSocket that connects between a car that sends real-time data through serial communication, and a server performs diagnosis on the car and sends the results back to the user.

616k views616k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring Framework	Mono
It provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform. The framework's core features can be used by any Java application, but there are extensions for building web applications on top of the Java EE platform.	It is a software platform designed to allow developers to easily create cross platform applications part of the .NET Foundation. It is an open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework based on the ECMA standards for C# and the Common Language Runtime.
Lightweight; Dependency Injection; Transaction Management	Cross platform ;Open source; Implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.1K	GitHub Stars 11.4K
GitHub Forks 38.8K	GitHub Forks 3.8K
Stacks 6.5K	Stacks 94
Followers 886	Followers 59
Votes 0	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 1 It was great, pre-dotnetcore
Integrations
AngularJS MySQL NetBeans IDE Hibernate IntelliJ IDEA	Entity Framework Mac OS X C# Windows Debian

What are some alternatives to Spring Framework, Mono?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Mono vs Spring Framework: What are the differences?

Language Compatibility: Mono is a cross-platform implementation of the .NET Framework, allowing developers to write applications in C# and run them on various platforms, including Linux and macOS. In contrast, Spring Framework is primarily used with Java and supports JVM-based languages, making it suitable for Java development.
Architecture: Mono focuses on providing a runtime environment for executing .NET applications, while Spring Framework offers a comprehensive set of libraries and tools for building enterprise Java applications. Spring emphasizes modular design and dependency injection, promoting best practices for developing robust and scalable applications.
Community Support: Mono has a smaller community compared to the Spring Framework, which benefits from a large and active user base contributing to its development and maintenance. This difference can impact the availability of resources, documentation, and third-party integrations for each framework.
Platform-Specific Features: Mono enables developers to target specific platforms by providing platform-specific APIs and libraries, enhancing interoperability with native code. On the other hand, Spring Framework abstracts away platform-specific details, promoting portability and ensuring consistent behavior across different environments.
Deployment Options: Mono applications can be deployed as standalone executables, simplifying distribution and installation for end-users. In contrast, Spring Framework applications are typically deployed as WAR files on Java application servers, allowing for more advanced deployment configurations and management options.
Innovation and Adaptability: Spring Framework is known for its continuous evolution and adaptation to new trends in software development, embracing modern practices such as reactive programming and microservices architecture. Mono, while providing cross-platform compatibility, may have limitations in terms of adopting cutting-edge technologies.

In Summary, Mono and Spring Framework differ in language compatibility, architecture focus, community support, platform-specific features, deployment options, and innovation/adaptability.

Mono vs Spring Framework

Overview