Alternatives to NGINX logo

Alternatives to NGINX

HAProxy, lighttpd, Traefik, Caddy, and Envoy are the most popular alternatives and competitors to NGINX.
111.6K
59.6K
+ 1
5.5K

What is NGINX and what are its top alternatives?

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.
NGINX is a tool in the Web Servers category of a tech stack.
NGINX is an open source tool with 20K GitHub stars and 6.5K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to NGINX's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to NGINX

  • HAProxy
    HAProxy

    HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications. ...

  • lighttpd
    lighttpd

    lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems. ...

  • Traefik
    Traefik

    A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically. ...

  • Caddy
    Caddy

    Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go. ...

  • Envoy
    Envoy

    Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures. ...

  • Microsoft IIS
    Microsoft IIS

    Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks. ...

  • Varnish
    Varnish

    Varnish Cache is a web application accelerator also known as a caching HTTP reverse proxy. You install it in front of any server that speaks HTTP and configure it to cache the contents. Varnish Cache is really, really fast. It typically speeds up delivery with a factor of 300 - 1000x, depending on your architecture. ...

  • Apache Tomcat
    Apache Tomcat

    Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations. ...

NGINX alternatives & related posts

HAProxy logo

HAProxy

2.4K
2.1K
560
The Reliable, High Performance TCP/HTTP Load Balancer
2.4K
2.1K
+ 1
560
PROS OF HAPROXY
  • 131
    Load balancer
  • 102
    High performance
  • 69
    Very fast
  • 58
    Proxying for tcp and http
  • 55
    SSL termination
  • 31
    Open source
  • 27
    Reliable
  • 20
    Free
  • 18
    Well-Documented
  • 12
    Very popular
  • 7
    Runs health checks on backends
  • 7
    Suited for very high traffic web sites
  • 6
    Scalable
  • 5
    Ready to Docker
  • 4
    Powers many world's most visited sites
  • 3
    Simple
  • 2
    Work with NTLM
  • 2
    Ssl offloading
  • 1
    Available as a plugin for OPNsense
CONS OF HAPROXY
  • 6
    Becomes your single point of failure

related HAProxy posts

Around the time of their Series A, Pinterest’s stack included Python and Django, with Tornado and Node.js as web servers. Memcached / Membase and Redis handled caching, with RabbitMQ handling queueing. Nginx, HAproxy and Varnish managed static-delivery and load-balancing, with persistent data storage handled by MySQL.

See more
Tom Klein

We're using Git through GitHub for public repositories and GitLab for our private repositories due to its easy to use features. Docker and Kubernetes are a must have for our highly scalable infrastructure complimented by HAProxy with Varnish in front of it. We are using a lot of npm and Visual Studio Code in our development sessions.

See more
lighttpd logo

lighttpd

148
131
27
A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments
148
131
+ 1
27
PROS OF LIGHTTPD
  • 7
    Lightweight
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Simplicity
  • 2
    Full featured
  • 2
    Proxy
  • 2
    Virtal hosting
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Available modules
  • 1
    Fast
  • 1
    Security
  • 1
    Ssl support
CONS OF LIGHTTPD
    Be the first to leave a con

    related lighttpd posts

    Traefik logo

    Traefik

    808
    1.2K
    93
    The Cloud Native Edge Router
    808
    1.2K
    + 1
    93
    PROS OF TRAEFIK
    • 20
      Kubernetes integration
    • 18
      Watch service discovery updates
    • 14
      Letsencrypt support
    • 13
      Swarm integration
    • 12
      Several backends
    • 6
      Ready-to-use dashboard
    • 4
      Easy setup
    • 4
      Rancher integration
    • 1
      Mesos integration
    • 1
      Mantl integration
    CONS OF TRAEFIK
    • 7
      Not very performant (fast)
    • 7
      Complicated setup

    related Traefik posts

    Gabriel Pa
    Shared insights
    on
    TraefikTraefikNGINXNGINX
    at

    We switched to Traefik so we can use the REST API to dynamically configure subdomains and have the ability to redirect between multiple servers.

    We still use nginx with a docker-compose to expose the traffic from our APIs and TCP microservices, but for managing routing to the internet Traefik does a much better job

    The biggest win for naologic was the ability to set dynamic configurations without having to restart the server

    See more
    Shared insights
    on
    EnvoyEnvoyHAProxyHAProxyTraefikTraefikNGINXNGINX

    We are looking to configure a load balancer with some admin UI. We are currently struggling to decide between NGINX, Traefik, HAProxy, and Envoy. We will use a load balancer in a containerized environment and the load balancer should flexible and easy to reload without changes in case containers are scaled up.

    See more
    Caddy logo

    Caddy

    318
    271
    20
    The Ultimate Server with Automatic HTTPS
    318
    271
    + 1
    20
    PROS OF CADDY
    • 6
      Easy HTTP/2 Server Push
    • 6
      Sane config file syntax
    • 4
      Builtin HTTPS
    • 2
      Letsencrypt support
    • 2
      Runtime config API
    CONS OF CADDY
    • 3
      New kid

    related Caddy posts

    Scott Mebberson
    CTO / Chief Architect at Idearium · | 5 upvotes · 392K views
    Shared insights
    on
    NGINXNGINXCaddyCaddy

    We used to primarily use nginx for our static web server and proxy in-front of Node.js. Now, we use Caddy. And we couldn't be happier.

    Caddy is simpler on all fronts. Configuration is easier. Free HTTPS out of the box. Some fantastic plugins. And for the most part, it's fast.

    Don't get me wrong, it's not lost on me that Nginx is actually a superior product.

    But for the times when you don't need that extra performance, and complexity - take a look at Caddy.

    See more
    Envoy logo

    Envoy

    288
    533
    9
    C++ front/service proxy
    288
    533
    + 1
    9
    PROS OF ENVOY
    • 9
      GRPC-Web
    CONS OF ENVOY
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Envoy posts

      Joseph Irving
      DevOps Engineer at uSwitch · | 7 upvotes · 532.7K views
      Shared insights
      on
      KubernetesKubernetesEnvoyEnvoyGolangGolang
      at

      At uSwitch we wanted a way to load balance between our multiple Kubernetes clusters in AWS to give us added redundancy. We already had ingresses defined for all our applications so we wanted to build on top of that, instead of creating a new system that would require our various teams to change code/config etc.

      Envoy seemed to tick a lot of boxes:

      • Loadbalancing capabilities right out of the box: health checks, circuit breaking, retries etc.
      • Tracing and prometheus metrics support
      • Lightweight
      • Good community support

      This was all good but what really sold us was the api that supported dynamic configuration. This would allow us to dynamically configure envoy to route to ingresses and clusters as they were created or destroyed.

      To do this we built a tool called Yggdrasil using their Go sdk. Yggdrasil effectively just creates envoy configuration from Kubernetes ingress objects, so you point Yggdrasil at your kube clusters, it generates config from the ingresses and then envoy can loadbalance between your clusters for you. This is all done dynamically so as soon as new ingress is created the envoy nodes get updated with the new config. Importantly this all worked with what we already had, no need to create new config for every application, we just put this on top of it.

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      EnvoyEnvoyHAProxyHAProxyTraefikTraefikNGINXNGINX

      We are looking to configure a load balancer with some admin UI. We are currently struggling to decide between NGINX, Traefik, HAProxy, and Envoy. We will use a load balancer in a containerized environment and the load balancer should flexible and easy to reload without changes in case containers are scaled up.

      See more
      Microsoft IIS logo

      Microsoft IIS

      15.2K
      7.5K
      236
      A web server for Microsoft Windows
      15.2K
      7.5K
      + 1
      236
      PROS OF MICROSOFT IIS
      • 83
        Great with .net
      • 55
        I'm forced to use iis
      • 27
        Use nginx
      • 18
        Azure integration
      • 15
        Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
      • 10
        Fast
      • 6
        Reliable
      • 6
        Performance
      • 4
        Powerful
      • 3
        Simple to configure
      • 3
        Webserver
      • 2
        Easy setup
      • 1
        Shipped with Windows Server
      • 1
        Ssl integration
      • 1
        Security
      • 1
        Охуенный
      CONS OF MICROSOFT IIS
      • 1
        Hard to set up

      related Microsoft IIS posts

      I am currently in school for computer science and am doing a class project about web servers. Our assignment is to research and select one of these web servers. Could you please let me know which one you would choose among NGINX, Microsoft IIS, and Apache HTTP Server and why?

      See more
      Varnish logo

      Varnish

      12.4K
      2.6K
      370
      High-performance HTTP accelerator
      12.4K
      2.6K
      + 1
      370
      PROS OF VARNISH
      • 104
        High-performance
      • 67
        Very Fast
      • 57
        Very Stable
      • 44
        Very Robust
      • 37
        HTTP reverse proxy
      • 21
        Open Source
      • 18
        Web application accelerator
      • 11
        Easy to config
      • 5
        Widely Used
      • 4
        Great community
      • 2
        Essential software for HTTP
      CONS OF VARNISH
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Varnish posts

        Around the time of their Series A, Pinterest’s stack included Python and Django, with Tornado and Node.js as web servers. Memcached / Membase and Redis handled caching, with RabbitMQ handling queueing. Nginx, HAproxy and Varnish managed static-delivery and load-balancing, with persistent data storage handled by MySQL.

        See more
        Tom Klein

        We're using Git through GitHub for public repositories and GitLab for our private repositories due to its easy to use features. Docker and Kubernetes are a must have for our highly scalable infrastructure complimented by HAProxy with Varnish in front of it. We are using a lot of npm and Visual Studio Code in our development sessions.

        See more
        Apache Tomcat logo

        Apache Tomcat

        16.2K
        12.1K
        201
        An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies
        16.2K
        12.1K
        + 1
        201
        PROS OF APACHE TOMCAT
        • 79
          Easy
        • 72
          Java
        • 49
          Popular
        • 1
          Spring web
        CONS OF APACHE TOMCAT
        • 2
          Blocking - each http request block a thread
        • 1
          Easy to set up

        related Apache Tomcat posts

        Остап Комплікевич

        I need some advice to choose an engine for generation web pages from the Spring Boot app. Which technology is the best solution today? 1) JSP + JSTL 2) Apache FreeMarker 3) Thymeleaf Or you can suggest even other perspective tools. I am using Spring Boot, Spring Web, Spring Data, Spring Security, PostgreSQL, Apache Tomcat in my project. I have already tried to generate pages using jsp, jstl, and it went well. However, I had huge problems via carrying already created static pages, to jsp format, because of syntax. Thanks.

        See more

        Java Spring JUnit

        Apache HTTP Server Apache Tomcat

        MySQL

        See more