Parcel vs Rome

Overview

Parcel

Stacks874

Followers250

Votes18

GitHub Stars44.0K

Forks2.3K

Rome

Stacks26

Followers12

Votes0

GitHub Stars23.6K

Forks650

Parcel vs Rome : What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Parcel and Rome, two popular build tools in web development.

1. **Bundling Method**: Parcel focuses on zero-config out-of-the-box experience, automatically handling package bundling, while Rome emphasizes a more configurable approach, allowing developers to customize the bundling process to their specific needs.

2. **Built-in Features**: Parcel comes with built-in support for hot module replacement, code splitting, and asset optimization, providing convenience for common tasks. In contrast, Rome offers a comprehensive toolchain with built-in linter, formatter, compiler, and test runner, catering to a wider range of development needs.

3. **Configuration**: Parcel requires minimal to no configuration, making it easy for beginners to start working on projects quickly. On the other hand, Rome requires detailed configuration setup to tailor the toolchain according to project requirements, which may be daunting for newcomers.

4. **Community Support**: Parcel has a larger community base and extensive documentation, ensuring easier troubleshooting and access to resources. Rome, being a newer tool, is still growing its community and may have limited third-party plugin support compared to Parcel.

5. **Performance**: Parcel is known for its fast build times, utilizing caching and parallel processing to improve development efficiency. Rome, with its emphasis on developer experience, aims to optimize build performance through efficient algorithms and dependency management strategies.

6. **Ecosystem Integration**: While Parcel integrates seamlessly with various package managers and frameworks like React and Vue, Rome offers tighter integration with its own set of tools, potentially limiting interoperability with third-party libraries and build configurations.

In Summary, Parcel and Rome differ in their bundling method, built-in features, configuration requirements, community support, performance, and ecosystem integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Parcel	Rome
Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.	It is an experimental JavaScript toolchain. It includes a compiler, linter, formatter, bundler, testing framework and more. It aims to be a comprehensive tool for anything related to the processing of JavaScript source code.
Blazing fast bundle times; Bundle all your assets; Automatic transforms; Zero config code splitting; Hot module replacement; Friendly error logging	Open Source; Compiler; Linter; Formatter; Bundler; Testing framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars 44.0K	GitHub Stars 23.6K
GitHub Forks 2.3K	GitHub Forks 650
Stacks 874	Stacks 26
Followers 250	Followers 12
Votes 18	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 Zero configuration 8 Built-in dev server with livereload Cons 3 Lack of documentation	No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript	JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Parcel, Rome ?

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Babel

Babel will turn your ES6+ code into ES5 friendly code, so you can start using it right now without waiting for browser support.

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Related Comparisons

Parcel vs Rome : What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Parcel and Rome, two popular build tools in web development.

1. **Bundling Method**: Parcel focuses on zero-config out-of-the-box experience, automatically handling package bundling, while Rome emphasizes a more configurable approach, allowing developers to customize the bundling process to their specific needs.

2. **Built-in Features**: Parcel comes with built-in support for hot module replacement, code splitting, and asset optimization, providing convenience for common tasks. In contrast, Rome offers a comprehensive toolchain with built-in linter, formatter, compiler, and test runner, catering to a wider range of development needs.

3. **Configuration**: Parcel requires minimal to no configuration, making it easy for beginners to start working on projects quickly. On the other hand, Rome requires detailed configuration setup to tailor the toolchain according to project requirements, which may be daunting for newcomers.

4. **Community Support**: Parcel has a larger community base and extensive documentation, ensuring easier troubleshooting and access to resources. Rome, being a newer tool, is still growing its community and may have limited third-party plugin support compared to Parcel.

5. **Performance**: Parcel is known for its fast build times, utilizing caching and parallel processing to improve development efficiency. Rome, with its emphasis on developer experience, aims to optimize build performance through efficient algorithms and dependency management strategies.

6. **Ecosystem Integration**: While Parcel integrates seamlessly with various package managers and frameworks like React and Vue, Rome offers tighter integration with its own set of tools, potentially limiting interoperability with third-party libraries and build configurations.

In Summary, Parcel and Rome differ in their bundling method, built-in features, configuration requirements, community support, performance, and ecosystem integration.

Parcel vs Rome

Overview