Phoenix Framework vs Spring

Overview

Spring

Stacks3.9K

Followers4.8K

Votes1.1K

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

Phoenix Framework

Stacks1.0K

Followers1.0K

Votes678

GitHub Stars22.6K

Forks3.0K

Phoenix Framework vs Spring: What are the differences?

Architecture: Phoenix Framework is built on Elixir language and follows the model-view-controller (MVC) architecture, while Spring is based on Java and supports various architectural patterns like MVC, dependency injection, and aspect-oriented programming.
Concurrency Handling: Phoenix uses the lightweight processes of the Erlang VM for handling concurrency efficiently, providing fault tolerance and scalability out of the box. In contrast, Spring relies on threads managed by the JVM, which may not offer the same level of fault tolerance and scalability as Erlang processes.
Language and Paradigm: Phoenix is functional programming-based, leveraging the functional programming paradigms of Elixir, which emphasizes immutability and higher-order functions. On the other hand, Spring is object-oriented and follows the principles of Java, which focuses on objects and classes for software design.
Framework Size and Configuration: Phoenix follows a "convention over configuration" approach, where developers are provided with sensible defaults to reduce the need for configuration. Spring, however, offers extensive configuration options and flexibility, allowing developers to fine-tune every aspect of their application.
Community and Ecosystem: Spring has a large community and ecosystem with extensive documentation, tutorials, and support. Phoenix, while growing, may not have as extensive a community or ecosystem as Spring, which can impact the availability of resources and libraries for developers.
Performance and Scalability: Due to its lightweight processes and built-in fault tolerance mechanisms, Phoenix is known for its high performance and scalability, making it suitable for building real-time applications. Spring, while powerful, may require additional configurations and optimizations to achieve the same level of performance as Phoenix in certain scenarios.

In Summary, Phoenix Framework and Spring differ in their architecture, concurrency handling, language paradigms, framework size, community support, and performance characteristics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Spring, Phoenix Framework

Tushar

Jan 7, 2021

Needs adviceon

Spring

Spring Boot

Django

Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.

Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.

827k views827k

Comments

Anonymous

Dec 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

Spring

Java

Node.js

I am provided with the opportunity to learn one of these technologies during my training. I have prior experience with Spring and found it tough and still haven't figured out when to use what annotations among the thousands of annotations provided. On the other hand, I am very proficient in Java data structures and algorithms (custom comparators, etc.)

I have used Node.js and found it interesting, but I am wondering If I am taking the risk of choosing a framework that has a comparatively lesser scope in the future. One advantage I see with the node.js is the number of tutorials available and the ease with which I can code.

Please recommend which path to take. Is Spring learnable, or should I spend my energy on learning Node.js instead?

290k views290k

Comments

Kamrul

Aug 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

Django

Spring Boot

I am a graduate student working as a software engineer in a company. For my personal development, I want to learn web development. I have some experience in Springboot while I was in university. So I want to continue with spring-boot, but I heard about Django. I'm reaching out to the experts here to help me choose a future proof framework. Django or Spring Boot?

Thanks in Advance

502k views502k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring	Phoenix Framework
A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.	Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.1K	GitHub Stars 22.6K
GitHub Forks 38.8K	GitHub Forks 3.0K
Stacks 3.9K	Stacks 1.0K
Followers 4.8K	Followers 1.0K
Votes 1.1K	Votes 678
Pros & Cons
Pros 230 Java 157 Open source 136 Great community 123 Very powerful 114 Enterprise Cons 15 Draws you into its own ecosystem and bloat 4 Poor documentation 3 Java 3 Verbose configuration 2 Java is more verbose language in compare to python	Pros 120 High performance 76 Super fast 70 Rapid development 62 Open source 60 Erlang VM Cons 6 No jobs 5 Very difficult
Integrations
Java	Elixir

What are some alternatives to Spring, Phoenix Framework?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

MEAN

MEAN (Mongo, Express, Angular, Node) is a boilerplate that provides a nice starting point for MongoDB, Node.js, Express, and AngularJS based applications. It is designed to give you a quick and organized way to start developing MEAN based web apps with useful modules like Mongoose and Passport pre-bundled and configured.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Phoenix Framework vs Spring: What are the differences?

Architecture: Phoenix Framework is built on Elixir language and follows the model-view-controller (MVC) architecture, while Spring is based on Java and supports various architectural patterns like MVC, dependency injection, and aspect-oriented programming.
Concurrency Handling: Phoenix uses the lightweight processes of the Erlang VM for handling concurrency efficiently, providing fault tolerance and scalability out of the box. In contrast, Spring relies on threads managed by the JVM, which may not offer the same level of fault tolerance and scalability as Erlang processes.
Language and Paradigm: Phoenix is functional programming-based, leveraging the functional programming paradigms of Elixir, which emphasizes immutability and higher-order functions. On the other hand, Spring is object-oriented and follows the principles of Java, which focuses on objects and classes for software design.
Framework Size and Configuration: Phoenix follows a "convention over configuration" approach, where developers are provided with sensible defaults to reduce the need for configuration. Spring, however, offers extensive configuration options and flexibility, allowing developers to fine-tune every aspect of their application.
Community and Ecosystem: Spring has a large community and ecosystem with extensive documentation, tutorials, and support. Phoenix, while growing, may not have as extensive a community or ecosystem as Spring, which can impact the availability of resources and libraries for developers.
Performance and Scalability: Due to its lightweight processes and built-in fault tolerance mechanisms, Phoenix is known for its high performance and scalability, making it suitable for building real-time applications. Spring, while powerful, may require additional configurations and optimizations to achieve the same level of performance as Phoenix in certain scenarios.

In Summary, Phoenix Framework and Spring differ in their architecture, concurrency handling, language paradigms, framework size, community support, and performance characteristics.