StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Phoenix Framework vs Vapor

Phoenix Framework vs Vapor

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Phoenix Framework
Phoenix Framework
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.0K
Votes678
GitHub Stars22.6K
Forks3.0K
Vapor
Vapor
Stacks117
Followers217
Votes65

Phoenix Framework vs Vapor: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This markdown provides a detailed comparison between Phoenix Framework and Vapor for web development.

1. **Language**: Phoenix is built using Elixir, a functional programming language, while Vapor is built using Swift, a general-purpose programming language developed by Apple.
2. **Framework Type**: Phoenix is a full-stack framework with conventions for everything from URL structure to testing, while Vapor is a micro-framework that gives developers more flexibility to choose their own tools and architecture.
3. **Concurrency Model**: Phoenix leverages the underlying Erlang VM for robust concurrency and fault tolerance, whereas Vapor utilizes Swift's native concurrency model for efficient multi-threading operations.
4. **Ecosystem**: Phoenix has a mature ecosystem with a wide range of libraries and tools available for developers, while Vapor has a smaller ecosystem due to its newer framework status.
5. **Community Support**: Phoenix has a large community of developers actively contributing to the framework's development and providing support, whereas Vapor, being newer, is still growing its community.
6. **Deployment Options**: Phoenix applications can be easily deployed on a variety of platforms, including Heroku and AWS, while Vapor applications are optimized for deployment on Apple's cloud platform, Vapor Cloud. 

In Summary, Phoenix Framework and Vapor have key differences in language, framework type, concurrency model, ecosystem, community support, and deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Phoenix Framework, Vapor

Jakes
Jakes

Mar 21, 2021

Decided

#rust @{#elixir}|topic:null| So am creating a messenger with voice call capabilities app which the user signs up using phone number and so at first i wanted to use Actix so i learned Rust so i thought to myself because well its first i felt its a bit immature to use actix web even though some companies are using Rust but we cant really say the full potential of Rust in a full scale app for example in Discord both Elixir and Rust are used meaning there is equal need for them but for Elixir so many companies use it from Whatsapp, Wechat, etc and this means something for Rust is not ready to go full scale we cant assume all this possibilities when it come Rust. So i decided to go the Erlang way after alot of Thinking so Do you think i made the right decision?Am 19 year programmer so i assume am not experienced as you so your answer or comment would really valuable to me

284k views284k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Phoenix Framework
Phoenix Framework
Vapor
Vapor

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Vapor is the first true web framework for Swift. It provides a beautifully expressive foundation for your app without tying you to any single server implementation.

-
Pure Swift (No makefiles, module maps);Modular;Beautifully expressive
Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.0K
Stacks
117
Followers
1.0K
Followers
217
Votes
678
Votes
65
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 120
    High performance
  • 76
    Super fast
  • 70
    Rapid development
  • 62
    Open source
  • 60
    Erlang VM
Cons
  • 6
    No jobs
  • 5
    Very difficult
Pros
  • 13
    Fast
  • 11
    Swift
  • 10
    Type-safe
  • 6
    Great for apis
  • 5
    Good Abstraction
Cons
  • 1
    Not as much support available.
  • 1
    Server side swift is still in its infancy
Integrations
Elixir
Elixir
Swift
Swift

What are some alternatives to Phoenix Framework, Vapor?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase