Play vs Spring Framework

Overview

Play

Stacks752

Followers609

Votes496

GitHub Stars12.6K

Forks4.1K

Spring Framework

Stacks6.5K

Followers886

Votes0

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

Play vs Spring Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key differences between Play and Spring Framework are important to understand for developers who are choosing a framework for their projects.

Architecture: Play Framework follows a more opinionated architecture, which provides a default structure to develop web applications, while Spring Framework offers more flexibility with its modular design, allowing developers to choose the components they want to use, such as Spring Boot for microservices.
Language Support: Play Framework is primarily designed for Scala and Java languages, making it a preferred choice for developers using these languages, whereas Spring Framework supports a wide range of programming languages, such as Java, Groovy, and Kotlin, providing more options for developers.
Template Engine: Play Framework comes with its own template engine called Twirl, which simplifies the process of creating views in web applications, while Spring Framework supports various template engines, such as Thymeleaf and FreeMarker, giving developers more flexibility in choosing the right tool for their project.
Reactive Programming: Play Framework is built on reactive principles, making it suitable for building reactive applications that can handle a high volume of concurrent users and I/O operations efficiently, while Spring Framework provides support for reactive programming through its Spring WebFlux module, offering similar capabilities.
Dependency Injection: Spring Framework is known for its robust dependency injection feature, which helps in managing dependencies between components, while Play Framework follows a more lightweight approach to dependency injection, which may be suitable for smaller projects with fewer dependencies.
Community and Ecosystem: Spring Framework has a large and active community with extensive documentation and support, offering a wide range of third-party libraries and tools, while Play Framework, although gaining popularity, may have a smaller community and ecosystem in comparison, affecting the availability of resources and solutions.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Play and Spring Framework is crucial for developers to choose the right framework based on their project requirements and familiarity with the specific features each framework offers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Play, Spring Framework

juan9222

Jul 25, 2020

Needs advice

Hi there, I'm deciding the technology to use in my project.

I need to build software that has:

Login
Register
Main View (access to a user account, News, General Info, Business hours, software, and parts section).
Account Preferences.
Web Shop for Parts (Support, Download Sections, Ticket System).

The most critical functionality is a WebSocket that connects between a car that sends real-time data through serial communication, and a server performs diagnosis on the car and sends the results back to the user.

616k views616k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Play	Spring Framework
Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.	It provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform. The framework's core features can be used by any Java application, but there are extensions for building web applications on top of the Java EE platform.
-	Lightweight; Dependency Injection; Transaction Management
Statistics
GitHub Stars 12.6K	GitHub Stars 59.1K
GitHub Forks 4.1K	GitHub Forks 38.8K
Stacks 752	Stacks 6.5K
Followers 609	Followers 886
Votes 496	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 81 Scala 55 Web-friendly architecture 55 Built on akka 50 Stateless 47 High-scalable Cons 3 Evolves fast, keep up with releases 1 Unnecessarily complicated	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	AngularJS MySQL NetBeans IDE Hibernate IntelliJ IDEA

What are some alternatives to Play, Spring Framework?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Play vs Spring Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key differences between Play and Spring Framework are important to understand for developers who are choosing a framework for their projects.

Architecture: Play Framework follows a more opinionated architecture, which provides a default structure to develop web applications, while Spring Framework offers more flexibility with its modular design, allowing developers to choose the components they want to use, such as Spring Boot for microservices.
Language Support: Play Framework is primarily designed for Scala and Java languages, making it a preferred choice for developers using these languages, whereas Spring Framework supports a wide range of programming languages, such as Java, Groovy, and Kotlin, providing more options for developers.
Template Engine: Play Framework comes with its own template engine called Twirl, which simplifies the process of creating views in web applications, while Spring Framework supports various template engines, such as Thymeleaf and FreeMarker, giving developers more flexibility in choosing the right tool for their project.
Reactive Programming: Play Framework is built on reactive principles, making it suitable for building reactive applications that can handle a high volume of concurrent users and I/O operations efficiently, while Spring Framework provides support for reactive programming through its Spring WebFlux module, offering similar capabilities.
Dependency Injection: Spring Framework is known for its robust dependency injection feature, which helps in managing dependencies between components, while Play Framework follows a more lightweight approach to dependency injection, which may be suitable for smaller projects with fewer dependencies.
Community and Ecosystem: Spring Framework has a large and active community with extensive documentation and support, offering a wide range of third-party libraries and tools, while Play Framework, although gaining popularity, may have a smaller community and ecosystem in comparison, affecting the availability of resources and solutions.

Play vs Spring Framework

Overview