StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Terminal Emulators
  5. Putty vs Windows Terminal

Putty vs Windows Terminal

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Putty
Putty
Stacks182
Followers117
Votes2
Windows Terminal
Windows Terminal
Stacks155
Followers175
Votes6
GitHub Stars100.8K
Forks8.9K

Putty vs Windows Terminal: What are the differences?

Putty and Windows Terminal are two commonly used tools for terminal emulation. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Interface and Customization: Putty has a simple and minimalistic interface that focuses solely on terminal emulation. It lacks advanced features like tabs, split panes, and multiple windows. On the other hand, Windows Terminal offers a modern and highly customizable interface with support for tabs, panes, themes, and various font styles, allowing users to personalize their terminal experience.

  2. Compatibility: Putty is primarily designed for Windows systems and provides excellent compatibility with various protocols like SSH, Telnet, and serial connections. It can also be run on other platforms using third-party software. Windows Terminal, although primarily developed for Windows, is an open-source project and can be compiled and used on Linux or macOS systems as well. It offers a more versatile platform support with a broader range of terminal protocols.

  3. Integration with Shell: Putty is a standalone application that doesn't integrate with any specific shell. It relies on external tools like PowerShell or Command Prompt to execute commands. On the other hand, Windows Terminal is designed to integrate seamlessly with various shells like PowerShell, Command Prompt, WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux), and more. It provides a unified terminal experience by allowing users to switch between different shells within a single interface.

  4. Customizability of Keybindings: Putty offers limited customization options for keybindings. Users have to rely on third-party tools or hacks to remap keys or create custom shortcuts. In contrast, Windows Terminal provides extensive keybinding customization options. Users can easily modify or create new keybindings for specific commands, functions, or applications, enhancing productivity and convenience.

  5. Multi-Tab Support: Putty lacks native support for multiple tabs. Users can open multiple instances of Putty windows to manage multiple connections simultaneously, which can be cumbersome. On the other hand, Windows Terminal provides a built-in tabbed interface, enabling users to open multiple terminals within a single window. This feature streamlines workflow and improves organization, particularly when working with multiple remote connections or tasks.

  6. Extensibility: Putty offers limited extensibility options, primarily through third-party tools and plugins. Windows Terminal, being an open-source project, provides a more extensive ecosystem for extensions and plugins. Users can benefit from a range of community-developed add-ons, themes, and productivity tools, further enhancing their terminal experience.

In summary, Putty is a lightweight SSH and telnet client primarily used for remote server access on Windows systems, offering basic terminal emulation features. In contrast, Windows Terminal is a modern, feature-rich command-line interface application from Microsoft that supports multiple shells, tabs, and customization options, providing a more versatile and user-friendly terminal experience for developers and system administrators.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Putty
Putty
Windows Terminal
Windows Terminal

It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.

A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community.

SSH client
Tabs; Rich text; Rlobalization; Configurability; Theming; Styling
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
100.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
8.9K
Stacks
182
Stacks
155
Followers
117
Followers
175
Votes
2
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    More popular
  • 1
    Free
Pros
  • 2
    Can be highly customized by using terminal preview
  • 2
    Add almost any cli tool using profiles
  • 2
    Free
Integrations
No integrations available
GNU Bash
GNU Bash

What are some alternatives to Putty, Windows Terminal?

iTerm2

iTerm2

A replacement for Terminal and the successor to iTerm. It works on Macs with macOS 10.12 or newer. iTerm2 brings the terminal into the modern age with features you never knew you always wanted.

Alacritty

Alacritty

It is the fastest terminal emulator in existence. Using the GPU for rendering enables optimizations that simply aren't possible without it. It currently supports macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows.

Hyper Terminal

Hyper Terminal

The goal of the project is to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users, built on open web standards. Focus will be primarily around speed and stability.

Cmder

Cmder

It is a software package created out of pure frustration over the absence of nice console emulators on Windows. It is based on amazing software, and spiced up with the Monokai color scheme and a custom prompt layout.

ConEmu

ConEmu

It aims to be handy, comprehensive, fast and reliable terminal window where you may host any console application developed either for WinAPI (cmd, powershell, far) or Unix PTY (cygwin, msys, wsl bash).

SecureCRT

SecureCRT

It provides rock-solid terminal emulation for computing professionals, raising productivity with advanced session management and a host of ways to save time and streamline repetitive tasks. It provides secure remote access, file transfer, and data tunneling for everyone in your organization.

Wave Terminal

Wave Terminal

It is an open-source, AI-native terminal that streamlines developer workflows with inline rendering, a modern UI, and persistent sessions. It offers plugins for rendering various file types, a powerful code editor, seamless local and remote session management, and native AI integration.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope