StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs Ratchet PHP

Apache Tomcat vs Ratchet PHP

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K
Ratchet PHP
Ratchet PHP
Stacks8
Followers27
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.4K
Forks792

Apache Tomcat vs Ratchet PHP: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Apache Tomcat and Ratchet PHP

Apache Tomcat and Ratchet PHP are both popular tools used in web development, but they have key differences that set them apart.

1. **Server Type**: Apache Tomcat is a Java-based web server and servlet container, while Ratchet PHP is a PHP library for creating WebSocket applications. This difference in server type defines the technologies they support and their primary use cases.
  
2. **Language Compatibility**: Apache Tomcat is primarily used for deploying Java-based web applications, while Ratchet PHP is specifically designed for PHP-based projects. This difference in language compatibility affects the development environment and the skillset required to work with each tool.

3. **Protocol Support**: Apache Tomcat supports HTTP and HTTPS protocols for web applications, whereas Ratchet PHP specializes in WebSocket protocol support for real-time bidirectional communication between clients and servers. This difference in protocol support influences the types of applications each tool is suitable for.

4. **Concurrency Model**: Apache Tomcat implements a multi-threaded concurrency model to handle multiple client requests simultaneously, whereas Ratchet PHP utilizes a event-driven non-blocking I/O model for high-performance WebSocket applications. This difference in concurrency model impacts the scalability and performance of applications built with these tools.

5. **Deployment Complexity**: Apache Tomcat requires a more complex deployment process due to its support for Java-based applications, which involve compiling and packaging Java files. In contrast, Ratchet PHP being a PHP library simplifies deployment by integrating directly into PHP projects without additional compilation steps. This difference in deployment complexity affects the ease of setup and maintenance for developers.

6. **Community and Support**: Apache Tomcat has a strong community of Java developers and a long history of support from Apache Software Foundation, providing extensive documentation and resources. Ratchet PHP, being a PHP library, benefits from the large PHP community but may have comparatively fewer resources and documentation available. This difference in community support impacts the availability of help and resources for developers using these tools.

In Summary, Apache Tomcat and Ratchet PHP differ in server type, language compatibility, protocol support, concurrency model, deployment complexity, and community support, influencing their suitability for different types of web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Tomcat, Ratchet PHP

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Ratchet PHP
Ratchet PHP

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

It is a loosely coupled PHP library providing developers with tools to create real time, bi-directional applications between clients and servers over WebSockets.

-
Fast & Easy; Components; Compatible
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Stars
6.4K
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
792
Stacks
16.9K
Stacks
8
Followers
12.6K
Followers
27
Votes
201
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Git
Git
PHP
PHP
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
phpPgAdmin
phpPgAdmin

What are some alternatives to Apache Tomcat, Ratchet PHP?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase