Revel vs Spring MVC

Overview

Revel

Stacks36

Followers100

Votes38

GitHub Stars13.2K

Forks1.4K

Spring MVC

Stacks479

Followers519

Votes0

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

Revel vs Spring MVC: What are the differences?

Configuration: Revel follows the convention over configuration principle, providing standard configurations and structures out of the box, aiming for simplicity and ease of use. On the other hand, Spring MVC offers a highly flexible configuration approach allowing developers to customize every aspect of the framework, giving more control but also requiring more configuration setup.
Dependency Injection: Spring MVC leverages the powerful Spring IoC container for managing dependencies, providing seamless integration and making it easier to test components in isolation. In contrast, Revel does not offer built-in support for dependency injection, reducing complexity but also limiting the flexibility in managing dependencies.
Template Engine: Revel uses its own template engine named Go templates, which are static typed and compiled, enhancing performance and type safety. Spring MVC, on the other hand, supports various template engines such as Thymeleaf, FreeMarker, and JSP, offering more choices but potentially leading to inconsistency across projects.
ORM Integration: Spring MVC integrates smoothly with popular ORM frameworks like Hibernate and JPA, providing robust mechanisms for managing database operations and entity mappings. Revel, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for ORM integration, requiring developers to implement database operations manually or use third-party libraries for this purpose.
Security Features: Spring MVC offers a comprehensive set of security features through the Spring Security module, allowing developers to implement authentication, authorization, and protection against common security threats easily. Revel does not have native support for advanced security features, requiring developers to implement security mechanisms manually or rely on third-party libraries for this functionality.
Community Support: Spring MVC has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and online resources, making it easier for developers to seek help and find solutions to their problems. In comparison, Revel has a smaller community and fewer resources available, which may pose challenges when encountering issues or seeking guidance during development.

In Summary, Revel and Spring MVC differ in configuration approach, dependency injection management, template engine support, ORM integration, security features, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Revel	Spring MVC
Revel makes it easy to build web applications using the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern by relying on conventions that require a certain structure in your application. In return, it is very light on configuration and enables an extremely fast development cycle.	A Java framework that follows the Model-View-Controller design pattern and provides an elegant solution to use MVC in spring framework by the help of DispatcherServlet.
-	Clear separation of roles; Customizable binding and validation; Adaptability; Flexibility
Statistics
GitHub Stars 13.2K	GitHub Stars 59.1K
GitHub Forks 1.4K	GitHub Forks 38.8K
Stacks 36	Stacks 479
Followers 100	Followers 519
Votes 38	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 16 Go 6 High-Productivity 5 Full-Stack 4 High performance 4 MVC	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Golang	AngularJS Bootstrap Spring Boot Hibernate

What are some alternatives to Revel, Spring MVC?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Revel vs Spring MVC: What are the differences?

Configuration: Revel follows the convention over configuration principle, providing standard configurations and structures out of the box, aiming for simplicity and ease of use. On the other hand, Spring MVC offers a highly flexible configuration approach allowing developers to customize every aspect of the framework, giving more control but also requiring more configuration setup.
Dependency Injection: Spring MVC leverages the powerful Spring IoC container for managing dependencies, providing seamless integration and making it easier to test components in isolation. In contrast, Revel does not offer built-in support for dependency injection, reducing complexity but also limiting the flexibility in managing dependencies.
Template Engine: Revel uses its own template engine named Go templates, which are static typed and compiled, enhancing performance and type safety. Spring MVC, on the other hand, supports various template engines such as Thymeleaf, FreeMarker, and JSP, offering more choices but potentially leading to inconsistency across projects.
ORM Integration: Spring MVC integrates smoothly with popular ORM frameworks like Hibernate and JPA, providing robust mechanisms for managing database operations and entity mappings. Revel, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for ORM integration, requiring developers to implement database operations manually or use third-party libraries for this purpose.
Security Features: Spring MVC offers a comprehensive set of security features through the Spring Security module, allowing developers to implement authentication, authorization, and protection against common security threats easily. Revel does not have native support for advanced security features, requiring developers to implement security mechanisms manually or rely on third-party libraries for this functionality.
Community Support: Spring MVC has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and online resources, making it easier for developers to seek help and find solutions to their problems. In comparison, Revel has a smaller community and fewer resources available, which may pose challenges when encountering issues or seeking guidance during development.

In Summary, Revel and Spring MVC differ in configuration approach, dependency injection management, template engine support, ORM integration, security features, and community support.

Revel vs Spring MVC

Overview