Alternatives to Ripcord logo

Alternatives to Ripcord

Discord, Slack, Microsoft Teams, HipChat, and Telegram are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Ripcord.
7
12
+ 1
12

What is Ripcord and what are its top alternatives?

A desktop chat client for group-centric services like Slack and Discord. It provides a traditional compact desktop interface designed for power users.
Ripcord is a tool in the Group Chat & Notifications category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Ripcord

  • Discord

    Discord

    Discord is a modern free voice & text chat app for groups of gamers. Our resilient Erlang backend running on the cloud has built in DDoS protection with automatic server failover. ...

  • Slack

    Slack

    Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together. ...

  • Microsoft Teams

    Microsoft Teams

    See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations. ...

  • HipChat

    HipChat

    HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business. ...

  • Telegram

    Telegram

    Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices. ...

  • Mattermost

    Mattermost

    Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

  • RocketChat

    RocketChat

    Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms. ...

  • Gitter

    Gitter

    Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations. ...

Ripcord alternatives & related posts

Discord logo

Discord

1.2K
1.2K
825
All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers that’s free, secure, and works on both your desktop and phone
1.2K
1.2K
+ 1
825
PROS OF DISCORD
  • 59
    Unlimited Users
  • 56
    Unlimited Channels
  • 52
    Easy to use
  • 48
    Voice Chat
  • 48
    Fast and easy set-ups and connections
  • 44
    Clean UI
  • 42
    Mobile Friendly
  • 40
    Free
  • 32
    Android App
  • 27
    Mention system
  • 27
    Customizable notifications on per channel basis
  • 26
    Customizable ranks/permissions
  • 22
    Good code embedding
  • 22
    IOS app
  • 20
    Vast Webhook Support
  • 17
    Dark mode
  • 15
    Roles
  • 15
    Easy context switching between work and home
  • 13
    Great Customer Support
  • 13
    Bot control
  • 13
    Easy to develop for
  • 13
    Great Communities
  • 13
    Very Resource Friendly
  • 12
    Video call meeting
  • 12
    Video Call Conference
  • 12
    Robust
  • 11
    Sharing screen layer
  • 11
    Able to hold 99 people in one call
  • 10
    Easy Server Setup and joining system
  • 10
    Cool
  • 10
    Shares screen with other member
  • 10
    Great browser experience
  • 9
    Easy
  • 8
    Lower bandwidth requirements than competitors
  • 8
    Better than Zoom
  • 8
    Easy to code bots for
  • 5
    Noice
  • 5
    Everyone look at my con (it's a pro disguised as a con)
  • 4
    Not got wierd emojis like everything made by google
  • 3
    Easily set up custom emoji
CONS OF DISCORD
  • 9
    Not as many integrations as Slack
  • 9
    For gamers
  • 4
    Limited file size
  • 4
    Discord is great, what are you talking about?
  • 4
    For everyone
  • 3
    Sends data to US Gov
  • 2
    Are u mad u ever heard of DMs???
  • 1
    Unsupportive Support
  • 1
    Undescriptive in global ban reasons
  • 1
    What i mean by this is someone said u cant chat lol
  • 1
    Suspected Pedophiles in few servers
  • 0
    Zoom is WAY better bc you can't even chat on Discord

related Discord posts

Josh Dzielak
Co-Founder & CTO at Orbit · | 19 upvotes · 367.3K views

Shortly after I joined Algolia as a developer advocate, I knew I wanted to establish a place for the community to congregate and share their projects, questions and advice. There are a ton of platforms out there that can be used to host communities, and they tend to fall into two categories - real-time sync (like chat) and async (like forums). Because the community was already large, I felt that a chat platform like Discord or Gitter might be overwhelming and opted for a forum-like solution instead (which would also create content that's searchable from Google).

I looked at paid, closed-source options like AnswerHub and ForumBee and old-school solutions like phpBB and vBulletin, but none seemed to offer the power, flexibility and developer-friendliness of Discourse. Discourse is open source, written in Rails with Ember.js on the front-end. That made me confident I could modify it to meet our exact needs. Discourse's own forum is very active which made me confident I could get help if I needed it.

It took about a month to get Discourse up-and-running and make authentication tied to algolia.com via the SSO plugin. Adding additional plugins for moderation or look-and-feel customization was fairly straightforward, and I even created a plugin to make the forum content searchable with Algolia. To stay on top of answering questions and moderation, we used the Discourse API to publish new messages into our Slack. All-in-all I would say we were happy with Discourse - the only caveat would be that it's very helpful to have technical knowledge as well as Rails knowledge in order to get the most out of it.

See more

From a StackShare Community member: “We’re about to start a chat group for our open source project (over 5K stars on GitHub) so we can let our community collaborate more closely. The obvious choice would be Slack (k8s and a ton of major projects use it), but we’ve seen Gitter (webpack uses it) for a lot of open source projects, Discord (Vue.js moved to them), and as of late I’m seeing Spectrum more and more often. Does anyone have experience with these or other alternatives? Is it even worth assessing all these options, or should we just go with Slack? Some things that are important to us: free, all the regular integrations (GitHub, Heroku, etc), mobile & desktop apps, and open source is of course a plus."

See more
Slack logo

Slack

90.4K
69.7K
6K
Bring all your communication together in one place
90.4K
69.7K
+ 1
6K
PROS OF SLACK
  • 1.2K
    Easy to integrate with
  • 877
    Excellent interface on multiple platforms
  • 848
    Free
  • 694
    Mobile friendly
  • 690
    People really enjoy using it
  • 331
    Great integrations
  • 315
    Flexible notification preferences
  • 198
    Unlimited users
  • 184
    Strong search and data archiving
  • 155
    Multi domain switching support
  • 82
    Easy to use
  • 40
    Beautiful
  • 27
    Hubot support
  • 22
    Unread/read control
  • 21
    Slackbot
  • 19
    Permalink for each messages
  • 17
    Text snippet with highlighting
  • 15
    Quote message easily
  • 14
    Per-room notification
  • 13
    Awesome integration support
  • 12
    IRC gateway
  • 12
    Star for each message / attached files
  • 11
    Dropbox Integration
  • 11
    Good communication within a team
  • 10
    Jira Integration
  • 10
    Slick, search is great
  • 9
    New Relic Integration
  • 8
    Combine All Services Quickly
  • 8
    Asana Integration
  • 8
    Great communication tool
  • 7
    Google Drive Integration
  • 7
    XMPP gateway
  • 7
    Awesomeness
  • 7
    This tool understands developers
  • 6
    BitBucket integration
  • 6
    Replaces email
  • 6
    Twitter Integration
  • 6
    Google Docs Integration
  • 5
    Jenkins Integration
  • 5
    GREAT Customer Support / Quick Response to Feedback
  • 5
    Guest and Restricted user control
  • 4
    Excellent multi platform internal communication tool
  • 4
    Clean UI
  • 4
    Gathers all my communications in one place
  • 4
    GitHub integration
  • 4
    Mention list view
  • 3
    Easy
  • 3
    Visual Studio Integration
  • 3
    Threaded chat
  • 3
    Easy to start working with
  • 3
    Great on-boarding
  • 3
    Timely while non intrusive
  • 3
    Perfect implementation of chat + integrations
  • 3
    Easy to add a reaction
  • 2
    Message Actions
  • 2
    Great Channel Customization
  • 2
    Simplicity
  • 2
    Android app
  • 2
    Great interface
  • 2
    Eases collaboration for geographically dispersed teams
  • 2
    So much better than email
  • 2
    Intuitive, easy to use, great integrations
  • 2
    Markdown
  • 2
    It's basically an improved (although closed) IRC
  • 1
    Community
  • 1
    I was 666 star :D
  • 1
    Multi work-space support
  • 1
    Dev communication Made Easy
  • 1
    Great API
  • 1
    Very customizable
  • 1
    Complete with plenty of Electron BLOAT
  • 1
    Archive Importing
  • 1
    Great Support Team
  • 1
    Easy remote communication
  • 1
    Get less busy
  • 1
    Targetprocess integration
  • 1
    Flexible and Accessible
  • 1
    Better User Experience
  • 1
    API
  • 1
    Integrates with just about everything
  • 1
    Travis CI integration
  • 1
    It's the coolest IM ever
  • 1
    Finally with terrible "threading"—I miss Flowdock
  • 0
    Platforms
  • 0
    Easy to useL
CONS OF SLACK
  • 12
    Can be distracting depending on how you use it
  • 6
    Requires some management for large teams
  • 5
    Limit messages history
  • 4
    Too expensive
  • 4
    You don't really own your messages
  • 3
    Too many notifications by default

related Slack posts

Lucas Litton
Founder & CEO at Macombey · | 24 upvotes · 130.7K views

Sentry has been essential to our development approach. Nobody likes errors or apps that crash. We use Sentry heavily during Node.js and React development. Our developers are able to see error reports, crashes, user's browsers, and more, all in one place. Sentry also seamlessly integrates with Asana, Slack, and GitHub.

See more
Yonas Beshawred

Using Screenhero via Slack was getting to be pretty horrible. Video and sound quality was often times pretty bad and worst of all the service just wasn't reliable. We all had high hopes when the acquisition went through but ultimately, the product just didn't live up to expectations. We ended up trying Zoom after I had heard about it from some friends at other companies. We noticed the video/sound quality was better, and more importantly it was super reliable. The Slack integration was awesome (just type /zoom and it starts a call)

You can schedule recurring calls which is helpful. There's a G Suite (Google Calendar) integration which lets you add a Zoom call (w/dial in info + link to web/mobile) with the click of a button.

Meeting recordings (video and audio) are really nice, you get recordings stored in the cloud on the higher tier plans. One of our engineers, Jerome, actually built a cool little Slack integration using the Slack API and Zoom API so that every time a recording is processed, a link gets posted to the "event-recordings" channel. The iOS app is great too!

#WebAndVideoConferencing #videochat

See more
Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

1.7K
1.3K
138
Chat-based workspace in Office 365
1.7K
1.3K
+ 1
138
PROS OF MICROSOFT TEAMS
  • 28
    Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow
  • 23
    Mobile friendly
  • 19
    Free
  • 12
    Great integrations
  • 11
    Well-thought Design
  • 10
    Channels
  • 8
    Easy setup
  • 6
    Unlimited users
  • 5
    Strong search and data archiving
  • 4
    Easy to integrate with
  • 4
    Multi domain switching support
  • 3
    Same interface on multiple platforms
  • 3
    Web interface
  • 2
    Great voice quality
CONS OF MICROSOFT TEAMS
  • 16
    Confusing UI
  • 12
    Bad performance on init and after quite a use
  • 9
    Bad Usermanagement
  • 6
    Can't see all members in a video meeting
  • 6
    No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)
  • 5
    No Markdown Support
  • 5
    Unable to Mute users
  • 4
    Forced WYSIWYG
  • 4
    MIssing public channels
  • 4
    You don't really own your messages
  • 3
    Challenging Onboarding
  • 3
    Is bad
  • 3
    Stubborn, unused friendly
  • 3
    No linux support

related Microsoft Teams posts

Jon Waite
Scrum Master at Costco Wholsale · | 3 upvotes · 45K views

Looking for the pros and cons for a tool we can use best for cross-team collaboration (software development). Has anyone compared Google Hangouts Chat with Microsoft Teams? What were the advantages of either??

See more
Jack Graves
Head of Product Development at Automation Consultants · | 2 upvotes · 193.3K views

We use Microsoft Teams as our primary workplace collaboration tool. It enables our team to work remotely and still collaborate on projects - with integration to JIRA and Confluence, the tool enables us to create War Rooms when problems occur and also provides information-sharing capabilities. Replaced HipChat.

See more
HipChat logo

HipChat

1.3K
883
683
Supercharge team collaboration with group chat and IM
1.3K
883
+ 1
683
PROS OF HIPCHAT
  • 144
    Integrates well with a lot of developer tools
  • 96
    Developer-friendly
  • 85
    Clients for every major platform
  • 70
    Mobile-friendly
  • 70
    Free unlimited users
  • 40
    Extremely easy to use for non-tech guys
  • 39
    Good api integration
  • 38
    Irc-like
  • 28
    Reliable
  • 26
    Feature rich
  • 13
    Affordable at $2/user
  • 6
    Email notifications
  • 6
    Text Messages
  • 4
    More developer-friendly than Skype
  • 3
    JIRA integration
  • 3
    Integrates with Atlassian products
  • 2
    Team Chat Rooms
  • 2
    Full text search
  • 1
    Intergration with all the things
  • 1
    gitlab
  • 1
    tagia
  • 1
    salt
  • 1
    Fast
  • 1
    On-Premise deployment
  • 1
    Trello integration
  • 1
    256-bit SSL encryption to transmit your data
CONS OF HIPCHAT
  • 1
    Purchased by and merged with Slack
  • 1
    Discontinued with the Atlassian Stack

related HipChat posts

Mark Nelissen

I use Slack because it offers the best experience, even on the free tier (which we're still using). As a comparison, I have had in depth experience with HipChat, Stride, Skype, Google Chat (the new service), Google Hangouts (the old service). For self hosted, Mattermost is open source and claims to support most Slack integrations, but I have not extensively investigated this claim.

See more
Jack Graves
Head of Product Development at Automation Consultants · | 2 upvotes · 193.3K views

We use Microsoft Teams as our primary workplace collaboration tool. It enables our team to work remotely and still collaborate on projects - with integration to JIRA and Confluence, the tool enables us to create War Rooms when problems occur and also provides information-sharing capabilities. Replaced HipChat.

See more
Telegram  logo

Telegram

590
483
29
A cloud-based instant messaging and voice over IP service
590
483
+ 1
29
PROS OF TELEGRAM
  • 11
    Lightweight
  • 5
    Great bot API
  • 5
    Unlimited history
  • 5
    Free
  • 1
    Can hide phone number
  • 1
    Media editor
  • 1
    Delete without a trace
CONS OF TELEGRAM
  • 2
    Notification customisation is limited
  • 2
    Requires phone number
  • 1
    No video call

related Telegram posts

Mattermost logo

Mattermost

422
510
275
Open-source, self-hosted, Slack alternative
422
510
+ 1
275
PROS OF MATTERMOST
  • 54
    Open source
  • 38
    On-premise deployment
  • 25
    Free
  • 22
    Built using golang
  • 19
    Fast and easy to use
  • 14
    Full text search
  • 13
    Docker image provided for easy setup
  • 12
    Built using react
  • 11
    Search and data archiving
  • 9
    Very professional
  • 9
    Supports multiple teams
  • 8
    Keeps us focused, effective, concise
  • 7
    Webhooks support
  • 6
    Integration with Gitlab
  • 6
    Clean and simple look
  • 5
    Well documented
  • 5
    Use #Hashtags like Twitter
  • 3
    Import Slack logs
  • 3
    Reactive community and ease of use
  • 2
    Self managed data
  • 1
    Easy webhook integration
  • 1
    On-premises Deployment
  • 1
    Secure
  • 1
    Slack-compatible integrations
  • 0
    On premise installation
CONS OF MATTERMOST
  • 1
    Not compatible with Telegram keys, which used by FSB
  • 1
    Basic permissions only in enterprise edition
  • 1
    Custom sidewide themes only in enterprise
  • 1
    Many basic features are enterprise only
  • 1
    Less integrations and plugins than slack

related Mattermost posts

Mark Nelissen

I use Slack because it offers the best experience, even on the free tier (which we're still using). As a comparison, I have had in depth experience with HipChat, Stride, Skype, Google Chat (the new service), Google Hangouts (the old service). For self hosted, Mattermost is open source and claims to support most Slack integrations, but I have not extensively investigated this claim.

See more
rishig
Head of Product at Zulip · | 5 upvotes · 134.8K views

I use Zulip instead of Slack, Mattermost, or RocketChat because of its first class threading. One week after switching to Gmail (in 2004) I realized I was never (willingly) going to use an unthreaded email product again. I had that same experience the first time I saw Zulip.

Zulip is also fully open-source, with a well-maintained (e.g. 90+% test coverage, fully static python), easily extensible code-base. In many companies, your communication platform (chat or email) is the center of the workplace -- no one asks for a chat integration into their calendar, they ask for a calendar integration into their chat. A fully open-source codebase means you can customize Zulip to your needs, and are never at the whim of a corporate maintainer who can't or won't fix simple bugs, or who will charge you tens of thousands of dollars for making minor customizations.

See more
RocketChat logo

RocketChat

347
493
322
Open source slack alternative
347
493
+ 1
322
PROS OF ROCKETCHAT
  • 71
    Open source
  • 38
    Can be deployed on premise
  • 32
    Byos (bring your own server)
  • 30
    Faster than Slack
  • 21
    Mobile app for iphone, ipad, and ipod touch
  • 19
    Desktop client for mac and windows
  • 19
    Built using meteor
  • 13
    Easily deployed on Cloud Services (Heroku, etc)
  • 10
    Screen Sharing
  • 9
    Excellent support & service, bar-none
  • 8
    Video and audio
  • 6
    Web client
  • 5
    Mobile app for android phone, tablet, and tv stick
  • 5
    Docker Image for easy setup
  • 5
    Open source
  • 5
    Multiple Security integrations - LDAP etc
  • 5
    Amazing product, fast moving development, and BYOS
  • 4
    Great development team
  • 4
    Free
  • 4
    Datacontrol
  • 2
    Love it - running on R Pi 2
  • 2
    Open source server
  • 1
    Linux Client Support
  • 1
    Flexible Integrations
  • 1
    Ldap integration
  • 1
    Slack bridge
  • 1
    Broadcast & Readonly channels
  • 0
    Threading model
CONS OF ROCKETCHAT
  • 1
    Not as well-known as others like it

related RocketChat posts

rishig
Head of Product at Zulip · | 5 upvotes · 134.8K views

I use Zulip instead of Slack, Mattermost, or RocketChat because of its first class threading. One week after switching to Gmail (in 2004) I realized I was never (willingly) going to use an unthreaded email product again. I had that same experience the first time I saw Zulip.

Zulip is also fully open-source, with a well-maintained (e.g. 90+% test coverage, fully static python), easily extensible code-base. In many companies, your communication platform (chat or email) is the center of the workplace -- no one asks for a chat integration into their calendar, they ask for a calendar integration into their chat. A fully open-source codebase means you can customize Zulip to your needs, and are never at the whim of a corporate maintainer who can't or won't fix simple bugs, or who will charge you tens of thousands of dollars for making minor customizations.

See more
Pradeep Sreeram
Shared insights
on
MattermostMattermostRocketChatRocketChat

We need to develop a social media like chat in which users can message each other or create a channel. We are planning to use RocketChat or Mattermost under the hood to develop a custom UI. How do notifications work in that case? Has anyone done it? Or is there any better way to implement it.

See more
Gitter logo

Gitter

237
253
276
Messaging for people who make software. Integrated with your team, projects and your code.
237
253
+ 1
276
PROS OF GITTER
  • 63
    Github integration
  • 54
    Free
  • 45
    Markdown support
  • 19
    Markdown
  • 17
    Graceful integration
  • 16
    Project-oriented
  • 15
    MARKDOOOOWN
  • 12
    IRC bridge
  • 9
    Integrates with everything
  • 8
    LaTeX
  • 4
    Apps available for most platforms
  • 2
    Cross-repository issue reference
  • 2
    Github login
  • 1
    IRC support
  • 1
    My new fav'rite thing is on it
  • 1
    Very fast work
  • 1
    Very open
  • 1
    Now open source
  • 1
    Open source
  • 1
    Free unlimited archives
  • 1
    Open access (no invitation needed)
  • 1
    Single account for all communities
  • 1
    Free, open & free hosting
CONS OF GITTER
  • 2
    Sends data to US Gov

related Gitter posts

Josh Dzielak
Co-Founder & CTO at Orbit · | 19 upvotes · 367.3K views

Shortly after I joined Algolia as a developer advocate, I knew I wanted to establish a place for the community to congregate and share their projects, questions and advice. There are a ton of platforms out there that can be used to host communities, and they tend to fall into two categories - real-time sync (like chat) and async (like forums). Because the community was already large, I felt that a chat platform like Discord or Gitter might be overwhelming and opted for a forum-like solution instead (which would also create content that's searchable from Google).

I looked at paid, closed-source options like AnswerHub and ForumBee and old-school solutions like phpBB and vBulletin, but none seemed to offer the power, flexibility and developer-friendliness of Discourse. Discourse is open source, written in Rails with Ember.js on the front-end. That made me confident I could modify it to meet our exact needs. Discourse's own forum is very active which made me confident I could get help if I needed it.

It took about a month to get Discourse up-and-running and make authentication tied to algolia.com via the SSO plugin. Adding additional plugins for moderation or look-and-feel customization was fairly straightforward, and I even created a plugin to make the forum content searchable with Algolia. To stay on top of answering questions and moderation, we used the Discourse API to publish new messages into our Slack. All-in-all I would say we were happy with Discourse - the only caveat would be that it's very helpful to have technical knowledge as well as Rails knowledge in order to get the most out of it.

See more

From a StackShare Community member: “We’re about to start a chat group for our open source project (over 5K stars on GitHub) so we can let our community collaborate more closely. The obvious choice would be Slack (k8s and a ton of major projects use it), but we’ve seen Gitter (webpack uses it) for a lot of open source projects, Discord (Vue.js moved to them), and as of late I’m seeing Spectrum more and more often. Does anyone have experience with these or other alternatives? Is it even worth assessing all these options, or should we just go with Slack? Some things that are important to us: free, all the regular integrations (GitHub, Heroku, etc), mobile & desktop apps, and open source is of course a plus."

See more