Rome vs Webpack: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Rome and Webpack.

1. **Configuration Flexibility**: Rome offers a singular configuration file that allows for simplified setup, while Webpack requires multiple configuration files for different environments or scenarios.
2. **Built-in Features**: Rome incorporates various tools like linting, formatting, and compiling without the need for additional plugins, unlike Webpack which primarily focuses on bundling assets.
3. **Intended Use**: Rome is designed as a comprehensive tool for managing JavaScript projects from start to finish, including testing and documentation, whereas Webpack mainly focuses on bundling and optimizing resources for the web.
4. **Ease of Use**: Rome provides an intuitive and beginner-friendly interface for project setup and management, making it easier for developers to get started, whereas Webpack has a steeper learning curve and requires a deeper understanding of its concepts.
5. **Performance**: Rome is optimized for speed and efficiency in project development and execution, while Webpack may require additional configuration and optimization to achieve similar performance levels.
6. **Community Support**: Webpack has a larger community base and more extensive documentation available for troubleshooting and support compared to Rome.

In Summary, Rome and Webpack differ in terms of configuration flexibility, built-in features, intended use, ease of use, performance, and community support.