StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. ExpressJS vs Flask vs actionhero.js

ExpressJS vs Flask vs actionhero.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flask
Flask
Stacks19.3K
Followers16.2K
Votes60
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Stacks35.1K
Followers24.0K
Votes1.6K
Actionhero
Actionhero
Stacks20
Followers34
Votes21
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

ExpressJS vs Flask vs actionhero.js: What are the differences?

Introduction:

ExpressJS, Flask, and ActionHero.js are all popular web frameworks used for server-side development, but they have key differences that set them apart from each other. Here are the specific differences between ExpressJS, Flask, and ActionHero.js.

1. Routing Mechanism: ExpressJS - ExpressJS has a more robust and flexible routing mechanism compared to Flask and ActionHero.js, allowing for easier setup of different routes for handling user requests.

2. Templating Engine: Flask - Flask comes with a built-in Jinja2 templating engine that simplifies passing data from the backend to the frontend, making it easier to generate dynamic content for web pages compared to ExpressJS and ActionHero.js.

3. Middleware Support: ExpressJS - ExpressJS has a wide range of middleware functions that can be easily integrated into the application to handle tasks like logging, authentication, and error handling, offering more flexibility compared to Flask and ActionHero.js.

4. WebSocket Support: ActionHero.js - ActionHero.js outshines ExpressJS and Flask in WebSocket support, providing built-in features for real-time communication between the client and server using technologies like Socket.io.

5. Plugin Ecosystem: ExpressJS - ExpressJS boasts a vast and well-established plugin ecosystem with a wide variety of middleware, libraries, and tools available for developers to extend the functionality of their applications, surpassing Flask and ActionHero.js in terms of community support.

6. Language Agnosticism: ActionHero.js - ActionHero.js allows developers to build API servers in multiple programming languages, making it unique compared to ExpressJS and Flask, which are tied to JavaScript and Python respectively.

In Summary, ExpressJS excels in routing and middleware support, Flask stands out with Jinja2 templating engine and ActionHero.js shines in WebSocket support and language agnosticism.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Flask
Flask
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Actionhero
Actionhero

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

It is a multi-transport #nodejs API Server with integrated cluster capabilities and delayed tasks.

-
Robust routing;HTTP helpers (redirection, caching, etc);View system supporting 14+ template engines;Content negotiation;Focus on high performance;Executable for generating applications quickly;High test coverage
Easy-to-use actions; Built-in tasks; Cluster-ready; Localization; Routing; Api-first development; File server
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
19.3K
Stacks
35.1K
Stacks
20
Followers
16.2K
Followers
24.0K
Followers
34
Votes
60
Votes
1.6K
Votes
21
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
Cons
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring
Pros
  • 381
    Simple
  • 336
    Node.js
  • 244
    Javascript
  • 193
    High performance
  • 152
    Robust routing
Cons
  • 27
    Not python
  • 17
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
Pros
  • 6
    Lightweight
  • 6
    Fast
  • 4
    Clear and declarative routing and controllers
  • 4
    Same API code for many transports (HTTP, Socket, etc)
  • 1
    Simple
Cons
  • 1
    Speed
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js
Node.js
Node.js
Redis
Redis
Resque
Resque

What are some alternatives to Flask, ExpressJS, Actionhero?

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase