Actix vs Cocoa Touch (iOS)

Overview

Cocoa Touch (iOS)

Stacks202

Followers208

Votes12

Actix

Stacks148

Followers224

Votes14

GitHub Stars9.1K

Forks666

Cocoa Touch (iOS) vs Actix: What are the differences?

Cocoa Touch (iOS): The Cocoa Touch collection of frameworks includes everything needed to create iOS apps. The Cocoa Touch layer contains key frameworks for building iOS apps. These frameworks define the appearance of your app. They also provide the basic app infrastructure and support for key technologies such as multitasking, touch-based input, push notifications, and many high-level system services; Actix: An actor system and web framework for Rust. It web is a simple, pragmatic and extremely fast web framework for Rust. Actors are objects which encapsulate state and behavior, they communicate exclusively by exchanging messages.

Cocoa Touch (iOS) and Actix belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

Actix is an open source tool with 3.3K GitHub stars and 216 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Actix's open source repository on GitHub.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

VitePress Frameworks

VitePress

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

Detailed Comparison

Cocoa Touch (iOS)	Actix
The Cocoa Touch layer contains key frameworks for building iOS apps. These frameworks define the appearance of your app. They also provide the basic app infrastructure and support for key technologies such as multitasking, touch-based input, push notifications, and many high-level system services.	It is a simple, pragmatic and extremely fast web framework for Rust. Actors are objects which encapsulate state and behavior, they communicate exclusively by exchanging messages.
-	Type Safe; Feature Rich; Extensible; Blazingly Fast
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 9.1K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 666
Stacks 202	Stacks 148
Followers 208	Followers 224
Votes 12	Votes 14
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Backed by Apple 4 It's just awesome 2 User Friendly Performance	Pros 6 Really really really fast 3 Very safe 3 Rust 2 Open source Cons 3 Lots of unsafe code
Integrations
Objective-C Swift	ExpressionEngine HTML5 Rust

What are some alternatives to Cocoa Touch (iOS), Actix?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.