StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Actix vs Django

Actix vs Django

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Django
Django
Stacks38.7K
Followers34.8K
Votes4.2K
GitHub Stars85.6K
Forks33.2K
Actix
Actix
Stacks149
Followers224
Votes14
GitHub Stars9.1K
Forks666

Actix vs Django: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the world of web development, Actix and Django are two popular frameworks used to build robust and efficient web applications. While both serve the purpose of developing web applications, they have several key differences that set them apart. Here, we will explore the key differences between Actix and Django.

  1. Concurrency Model: Actix is built on an asynchronous, actor-based concurrency model, which allows handling a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. On the other hand, Django follows the synchronous, request-response model, which means it processes requests one after the other. This difference in concurrency model makes Actix a preferred choice for high-performance applications that require handling a large number of simultaneous connections and real-time events.

  2. Language Support: Actix is primarily built using the Rust programming language, known for its memory safety, concurrency, and speed. Rust's language features, such as explicit error handling and ownership system, make Actix a reliable framework for building secure and performant applications. In contrast, Django is primarily based on Python, which offers a more expressive and developer-friendly syntax. Python's extensive ecosystem and ease of use make Django a popular choice for rapid prototyping and building full-featured web applications quickly.

  3. Configuration and Complexity: Actix follows a convention-over-configuration principle, which means it offers a minimalistic approach with sensible defaults. It requires explicit configuration only when needed, reducing the development overhead and making it easier to get started. On the other hand, Django provides a highly configurable framework with extensive built-in features. While this allows more control and flexibility, it also means that Django can be more complex to configure and maintain, especially for smaller projects or beginner developers.

  4. Database Support: Actix has a modular approach to database support and allows integration with various databases through different crate libraries. This gives developers the freedom to choose the most suitable database solution for their application's specific needs. Django, on the other hand, comes with an integrated Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) layer that provides an abstraction over the database system. It offers support for multiple databases out of the box, making it easier to work with databases but limiting the flexibility compared to Actix.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Django has a large and mature community with a vast ecosystem of libraries and plugins built around it. This means that developers can find extensive documentation, support, and ready-to-use solutions for common web development tasks. Actix, being a newer framework, has a smaller yet growing community and a more limited ecosystem compared to Django.

  6. Learning Curve and Documentation: Django has a well-structured and comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers, especially beginners, to get started and learn the framework. It provides detailed guides, tutorials, and examples to help developers understand various concepts and features. Actix, being a relatively new and rapidly evolving framework, has a less extensive documentation and fewer learning resources available, which might make it more challenging for beginners to grasp and use effectively.

In summary, Actix and Django have different approaches to concurrency, programming languages, configuration, database support, and community ecosystem. Actix shines in high-performance scenarios with its asynchronous, actor-based approach and efficient handling of concurrent connections, while Django offers a more comprehensive framework with extensive features and community support, making it suitable for a wide range of web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Django, Actix

Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Decided

Since I came from python I had two choices: #django or #flask. It felt like it was a better idea to go for #django considering I was building a blogging platform, this is kind of what #django was made for. On the other hand, #rails seems to be a fantastic framework to get things done. Although I do not regret any of my time spent on developing with #django I want to give @{#rails}|topic:null| a try some day in the future for the sake of curiosity.

438k views438k
Comments
Sandeep
Sandeep

Jun 13, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonJavaScriptJavaScriptJinjaJinja

I have learned both Python and JavaScript. I also tried my hand at Django. But i found it difficult to work with Django, on frontend its Jinja format is very confusing and limited. I have not tried Node.js yet and unsure which tool to go ahead with. I want an internship as soon as possible so please answer keeping that in mind.

599k views599k
Comments
Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Django
Django
Actix
Actix

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

It is a simple, pragmatic and extremely fast web framework for Rust. Actors are objects which encapsulate state and behavior, they communicate exclusively by exchanging messages.

-
Type Safe; Feature Rich; Extensible; Blazingly Fast
Statistics
GitHub Stars
85.6K
GitHub Stars
9.1K
GitHub Forks
33.2K
GitHub Forks
666
Stacks
38.7K
Stacks
149
Followers
34.8K
Followers
224
Votes
4.2K
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 678
    Rapid development
  • 488
    Open source
  • 426
    Great community
  • 380
    Easy to learn
  • 277
    Mvc
Cons
  • 26
    Underpowered templating
  • 22
    Autoreload restarts whole server
  • 22
    Underpowered ORM
  • 15
    URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
  • 10
    Internal subcomponents coupling
Pros
  • 6
    Really really really fast
  • 3
    Rust
  • 3
    Very safe
  • 2
    Open source
Cons
  • 3
    Lots of unsafe code
Integrations
Python
Python
ExpressionEngine
ExpressionEngine
HTML5
HTML5
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to Django, Actix?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase