StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Actix vs Micronaut Framework

Actix vs Micronaut Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Micronaut Framework
Micronaut Framework
Stacks186
Followers330
Votes52
Actix
Actix
Stacks149
Followers224
Votes14
GitHub Stars9.1K
Forks666

Actix vs Micronaut Framework: What are the differences?

<Actix vs Micronaut Framework Comparison>
  1. Architecture: Actix is based on the actor model and provides a high level of concurrency while Micronaut is a lightweight framework that supports building microservices.

  2. Language Support: Actix is primarily used with Rust programming language whereas Micronaut is compatible with multiple languages like Java, Kotlin, and Groovy.

  3. Startup Time: Micronaut framework boasts exceptionally fast startup times due to its pre-computation at compile time, unlike Actix which may have a longer startup time in comparison.

  4. Dependency Injection: Micronaut utilizes compile-time dependency injection which aids in reducing runtime overheads, while Actix does not offer built-in support for dependency injection.

  5. Automatic Configuration: Micronaut provides automatic configuration of various components based on conventions and the reflection API, whereas Actix requires manual configuration for components.

  6. Ecosystem: Micronaut has a larger ecosystem of plugins, middleware, and community support compared to Actix, providing more options and resources for developers.

In Summary, Actix and Micronaut Framework differ in architecture, language support, startup time, dependency injection, automatic configuration, and ecosystem support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Micronaut Framework
Micronaut Framework
Actix
Actix

It is a modern, JVM-based, full-stack framework for building modular, easily testable microservice and serverless applications. It features a Dependency Injection and Aspect-Oriented Programming runtime that uses no reflection.

It is a simple, pragmatic and extremely fast web framework for Rust. Actors are objects which encapsulate state and behavior, they communicate exclusively by exchanging messages.

build testable microservice ; build serverless applications; JVM based framework
Type Safe; Feature Rich; Extensible; Blazingly Fast
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
666
Stacks
186
Stacks
149
Followers
330
Followers
224
Votes
52
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Compilable to machine code
  • 8
    Tiny memory footprint
  • 7
    Open source
  • 7
    Almost instantaneous startup
  • 6
    Tiny compiled code size
Cons
  • 3
    No hot reload
Pros
  • 6
    Really really really fast
  • 3
    Very safe
  • 3
    Rust
  • 2
    Open source
Cons
  • 3
    Lots of unsafe code
Integrations
GraalVM
GraalVM
Kotlin
Kotlin
Java
Java
Groovy
Groovy
ExpressionEngine
ExpressionEngine
HTML5
HTML5
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to Micronaut Framework, Actix?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase