StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Actix vs nginx

Actix vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Actix
Actix
Stacks149
Followers224
Votes14
GitHub Stars9.1K
Forks666

Actix vs nginx: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Actix and nginx

Actix and nginx are both widely used technologies in the field of web servers. While they both serve the purpose of handling client requests and serving responses, there are several key differences between the two.

1. **Architecture**: Actix is a high-powered, actor-based framework for building web applications in Rust, while nginx is a lightweight, open-source web server. Actix uses an event-driven, non-blocking architecture, allowing for high concurrency and scalability. Nginx, on the other hand, uses a multi-process, multi-threaded architecture.

2. **Language**: Actix is built specifically for the Rust programming language, allowing developers to take advantage of Rust’s memory safety and performance benefits. Nginx, on the other hand, is written in C and can be extended using various scripting languages like Lua.

3. **Flexibility**: Actix provides developers with a flexible and modular framework for building web applications, allowing for easy customization and extensibility. Nginx, on the other hand, is primarily designed as a web server and reverse proxy, providing a more focused set of features.

4. **Configuration**: Actix applications are typically configured using code, allowing for dynamic configuration and easy deployment. Nginx, on the other hand, uses a configuration file that needs to be manually edited, requiring a server restart for changes to take effect.

5. **Performance**: Actix is known for its exceptional performance and low resource usage, making it a great choice for high-performance applications. Nginx also performs well and is often used as a load balancer or reverse proxy, but Actix's event-driven architecture gives it an edge in certain scenarios.

6. **Community and Ecosystem**: Actix is a relatively newer technology and has a smaller community compared to nginx. Nginx, being a mature and widely adopted web server, has a large and active community, along with extensive documentation and third-party extensions.

In summary, Actix and nginx differ in their architecture, language, flexibility, configuration, performance, and community. Actix provides a highly performant and flexible framework for building web applications in Rust, while nginx is a lightweight web server and reverse proxy with a large community and extensive ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Actix

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Actix
Actix

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

It is a simple, pragmatic and extremely fast web framework for Rust. Actors are objects which encapsulate state and behavior, they communicate exclusively by exchanging messages.

-
Type Safe; Feature Rich; Extensible; Blazingly Fast
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
9.1K
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
666
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
149
Followers
61.9K
Followers
224
Votes
5.5K
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 6
    Really really really fast
  • 3
    Very safe
  • 3
    Rust
  • 2
    Open source
Cons
  • 3
    Lots of unsafe code
Integrations
No integrations available
ExpressionEngine
ExpressionEngine
HTML5
HTML5
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Actix?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase