Actix vs Yesod

Overview

Yesod

Stacks37

Followers41

Votes15

GitHub Stars2.7K

Forks376

Actix

Stacks148

Followers224

Votes14

GitHub Stars9.1K

Forks666

Actix vs Yesod: What are the differences?

Performance: Actix is known for its high performance and low overhead due to its actor model implementation, while Yesod is praised for its strong type safety and compile-time guarantees, albeit at the cost of slightly lower performance compared to Actix.
Language: Actix is written in Rust, a systems programming language known for its memory safety and high performance, whereas Yesod is written in Haskell, a purely functional programming language that facilitates rapid development and concise code but might have a steeper learning curve for some developers.
Web Framework: Actix is a Rust web framework focused on speed and asynchronous handling, providing tools for creating efficient and scalable web applications, while Yesod is a Haskell web framework that emphasizes strong typing and type-safe routing, making it suitable for developing robust and secure web applications.
Community Support: Actix has a relatively smaller but active community with a strong focus on performance optimization and building high-speed applications, whereas Yesod benefits from a supportive Haskell community that values correctness and robustness in web development, providing a wealth of resources and libraries for functional programming enthusiasts.
Database Integration: Actix provides seamless integration with databases through its various crates and libraries optimized for high-concurrency environments, offering efficient data persistence options, whereas Yesod boasts a powerful Persistent library that simplifies database access and ensures type-safe interactions with databases, prioritizing correctness and data consistency.
Learning Curve: Actix's actor model and performance optimizations might present a steeper learning curve for developers transitioning from traditional web frameworks, while Yesod's strong type system and functional programming paradigms can be challenging for those new to Haskell or functional programming concepts.

In Summary, Actix and Yesod differ in terms of performance, language, web framework design, community support, database integration, and learning curve, catering to different developer preferences and project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Yesod	Actix
Yesod believes in the philosophy of making the compiler your ally, not your enemy. We use the type system to enforce as much as possible, from generating proper links, to avoiding XSS attacks, to dealing with character encoding issues. In general, if your code compiles, it works. And instead of declaring types everywhere you let the compiler figure them out for you with type inference.	It is a simple, pragmatic and extremely fast web framework for Rust. Actors are objects which encapsulate state and behavior, they communicate exclusively by exchanging messages.
Safety & security guaranteed at compile time; Developer productivity; Raw performance; Fast, compiled code; Techniques for constant-space memory consumption; Asynchronous IO	Type Safe; Feature Rich; Extensible; Blazingly Fast
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.7K	GitHub Stars 9.1K
GitHub Forks 376	GitHub Forks 666
Stacks 37	Stacks 148
Followers 41	Followers 224
Votes 15	Votes 14
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Haskell 4 Super High Performance 3 Open source 2 Type safe URLs	Pros 6 Really really really fast 3 Rust 3 Very safe 2 Open source Cons 3 Lots of unsafe code
Integrations
Haskell	ExpressionEngine HTML5 Rust

What are some alternatives to Yesod, Actix?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Actix vs Yesod: What are the differences?

Performance: Actix is known for its high performance and low overhead due to its actor model implementation, while Yesod is praised for its strong type safety and compile-time guarantees, albeit at the cost of slightly lower performance compared to Actix.
Language: Actix is written in Rust, a systems programming language known for its memory safety and high performance, whereas Yesod is written in Haskell, a purely functional programming language that facilitates rapid development and concise code but might have a steeper learning curve for some developers.
Web Framework: Actix is a Rust web framework focused on speed and asynchronous handling, providing tools for creating efficient and scalable web applications, while Yesod is a Haskell web framework that emphasizes strong typing and type-safe routing, making it suitable for developing robust and secure web applications.
Community Support: Actix has a relatively smaller but active community with a strong focus on performance optimization and building high-speed applications, whereas Yesod benefits from a supportive Haskell community that values correctness and robustness in web development, providing a wealth of resources and libraries for functional programming enthusiasts.
Database Integration: Actix provides seamless integration with databases through its various crates and libraries optimized for high-concurrency environments, offering efficient data persistence options, whereas Yesod boasts a powerful Persistent library that simplifies database access and ensures type-safe interactions with databases, prioritizing correctness and data consistency.
Learning Curve: Actix's actor model and performance optimizations might present a steeper learning curve for developers transitioning from traditional web frameworks, while Yesod's strong type system and functional programming paradigms can be challenging for those new to Haskell or functional programming concepts.

Actix vs Yesod

Overview