StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. AdonisJS vs Rocket

AdonisJS vs Rocket

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rocket
Rocket
Stacks91
Followers176
Votes12
AdonisJS
AdonisJS
Stacks210
Followers456
Votes122

AdonisJS vs Rocket: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This comparison highlights the key differences between AdonisJS and Rocket based on specific attributes of both web frameworks.

1. **Programming Language**: AdonisJS is written in JavaScript and is based on Node.js, while Rocket is written in Rust.
2. **Popularity**: AdonisJS is relatively more popular, especially among developers familiar with Node.js, while Rocket is gaining popularity in the Rust community.
3. **Feature Set**: AdonisJS provides a rich feature set out of the box, including ORM, authentication, and more, while Rocket aims to be lightweight and allows developers to choose and integrate only the necessary components for their projects.
4. **Concurrency Model**: AdonisJS follows a single-threaded model similar to Node.js, while Rocket takes advantage of Rust's ownership and borrowing system to provide safe concurrency by design.
5. **Error Handling**: AdonisJS has built-in error handling mechanisms, making it easier for developers to handle exceptions, whereas in Rocket, error handling needs to be explicitly implemented by the developer.
6. **Learning Curve**: AdonisJS is relatively easier to learn for developers familiar with JavaScript and Node.js ecosystem, while Rocket requires a solid understanding of Rust's ownership system and asynchronous programming concepts.

In Summary, the key differences between AdonisJS and Rocket lie in their programming languages, popularity, feature set, concurrency model, error handling, and learning curve. AdonisJS is more widely adopted among Node.js developers with a rich feature set, while Rocket is gaining traction in the Rust community with a focus on performance and control over components.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rocket
Rocket
AdonisJS
AdonisJS

Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code.

It is a Node.js Framework which is highly focused on developer ergonomics, stability and confidence.

From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something; Boilerplate free; Easy to use; Extensible
mvc, orm, service provider, router
Statistics
Stacks
91
Stacks
210
Followers
176
Followers
456
Votes
12
Votes
122
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Uses all the rust features extensively
  • 1
    Inbuilt templating feature
  • 1
    Django analog in rust
  • 1
    Provides nice abstractions
Cons
  • 1
    Only runs in nightly
Pros
  • 25
    Laravel like
  • 24
    Easy to learn
  • 23
    MVC
  • 21
    Beautiful code
  • 10
    ORM Mapper
Cons
  • 5
    Small community
  • 1
    Poor documentation
Integrations
Rust
Rust
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Rocket, AdonisJS?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase