AEM vs Apache Sling

Overview

Apache Sling

Stacks10

Followers26

Votes0

AEM

Stacks108

Followers134

Votes0

AEM vs Apache Sling: What are the differences?

AEM (Adobe Experience Manager) and Apache Sling are both content management systems (CMS) built on top of the Apache Jackrabbit content repository. However, there are key differences between the two:

Functionality and Purpose: AEM (Adobe Experience Manager) is an enterprise-level CMS with robust features for managing and delivering digital content across channels, while Apache Sling is a lightweight RESTful web framework for content-oriented applications, emphasizing resource-based content modeling and flexibility.
User Interface and Authoring Experience: AEM offers a user-friendly and intuitive authoring interface that enables non-technical users to create and manage content easily. It provides a drag-and-drop interface, in-context editing, and a powerful component-based approach for building web pages and experiences. Apache Sling, on the other hand, does not provide a built-in user interface or authoring environment. It focuses more on providing a framework for content delivery and relies on custom-built applications or other tools to create and manage content.
Extensibility and Customization: AEM is highly extensible and provides a robust set of APIs, frameworks, and tools for customizing and extending its functionality. It supports the development of custom components, templates, workflows, and integrations with third-party systems. AEM also offers a vibrant ecosystem of plugins and extensions that further enhance its capabilities. Apache Sling, being a lightweight framework, is designed to be highly extensible and allows developers to build custom applications and services using its RESTful architecture. It provides a flexible content model and a powerful scripting engine for customization.
Community and Support: AEM has robust support from Adobe with extensive resources and a strong community, while Apache Sling benefits from the collaborative efforts of the broader Apache community but may have more limited resources and support compared to AEM.

In summary, AEM is a feature-rich enterprise-level CMS that provides extensive content management capabilities and a user-friendly authoring experience. It is designed for managing and delivering digital experiences at scale. Apache Sling, on the other hand, is a lightweight content-oriented framework that focuses on providing a RESTful architecture for building custom content-oriented applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Sling	AEM
It is a framework for RESTful web-applications based on an extensible content tree. It maps HTTP request URLs to content resources based on the request's path, extension and selectors. Using convention over configuration, requests are processed by scripts and servlets, dynamically selected based on the current resource. This fosters meaningful URLs and resource driven request processing, while the modular nature of Sling allows for specialized server instances that include only what is needed.	It is a web-based client-server system for building, managing and deploying commercial websites and related services. It combines a number of infrastructure-level and application-level functions into a single integrated package.
REST based web framework; Content-driven, using a JCR content repository; Powered by OSGi; Scripting inside, multiple languages (JSP, server-side javascript, Scala, etc.); Apache Open Source project	-
Statistics
Stacks 10	Stacks 108
Followers 26	Followers 134
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Java Scala JavaScript	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Apache Sling, AEM?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Functionality and Purpose: AEM (Adobe Experience Manager) is an enterprise-level CMS with robust features for managing and delivering digital content across channels, while Apache Sling is a lightweight RESTful web framework for content-oriented applications, emphasizing resource-based content modeling and flexibility.
User Interface and Authoring Experience: AEM offers a user-friendly and intuitive authoring interface that enables non-technical users to create and manage content easily. It provides a drag-and-drop interface, in-context editing, and a powerful component-based approach for building web pages and experiences. Apache Sling, on the other hand, does not provide a built-in user interface or authoring environment. It focuses more on providing a framework for content delivery and relies on custom-built applications or other tools to create and manage content.
Extensibility and Customization: AEM is highly extensible and provides a robust set of APIs, frameworks, and tools for customizing and extending its functionality. It supports the development of custom components, templates, workflows, and integrations with third-party systems. AEM also offers a vibrant ecosystem of plugins and extensions that further enhance its capabilities. Apache Sling, being a lightweight framework, is designed to be highly extensible and allows developers to build custom applications and services using its RESTful architecture. It provides a flexible content model and a powerful scripting engine for customization.
Community and Support: AEM has robust support from Adobe with extensive resources and a strong community, while Apache Sling benefits from the collaborative efforts of the broader Apache community but may have more limited resources and support compared to AEM.

AEM vs Apache Sling