StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data As A Service
  5. Aerospike vs Amazon Redshift

Aerospike vs Amazon Redshift

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
Stacks1.5K
Followers1.4K
Votes108
Aerospike
Aerospike
Stacks200
Followers288
Votes48
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks196

Aerospike vs Amazon Redshift: What are the differences?

Introduction

Aerospike and Amazon Redshift are two popular data storage and processing solutions used in the industry. While both offer scalable and reliable options for managing and analyzing large volumes of data, they differ in several key aspects.

  1. Data Model: Aerospike is a NoSQL database with a key-value data model, allowing flexible schema-less data storage. On the other hand, Amazon Redshift uses a columnar data model, which is more suitable for structured and relational data.

  2. Scalability: Aerospike is designed for horizontal scalability, allowing data to be distributed across multiple nodes and ensuring high availability and performance. Amazon Redshift, on the other hand, is vertically scalable, meaning it can handle larger data volumes by increasing the computing power and storage capacity of a single node.

  3. Query Language and Analytics: Aerospike provides a rich query language with support for secondary indexes, allowing for flexible data retrieval. It also integrates with various analytics solutions like Apache Spark and Apache Kafka for real-time data processing. In contrast, Amazon Redshift supports SQL-based queries and is optimized for complex analytics workloads including aggregation, filtering, and join operations.

  4. Data Storage and Retrieval: Aerospike stores data in memory as well as on disk, providing fast access to frequently accessed data. It offers features like data expiration and eviction policies to manage the data efficiently. Amazon Redshift, on the other hand, stores data primarily on disk and utilizes columnar compression to optimize storage and retrieval performance.

  5. Data Consistency and Durability: Aerospike guarantees strong consistency and durability by using techniques like replication and write-ahead logging. It also supports multi-datacenter replication for disaster recovery. Amazon Redshift, on the other hand, provides eventual consistency and durability through automated backups and snapshots. It also supports cross-region replication for data redundancy.

  6. Cost and Pricing Model: Aerospike offers both open-source and enterprise editions, providing flexibility in terms of deployment and licensing costs. The open-source edition is free to use, while the enterprise edition comes with additional features and support. Amazon Redshift follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the usage, including factors like storage, compute, and data transfer costs.

In summary, Aerospike and Amazon Redshift have key differences in terms of data model, scalability, query language, storage and retrieval, data consistency, and pricing. Understanding these differences is essential in choosing the right solution based on specific requirements and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon Redshift, Aerospike

datocrats-org
datocrats-org

Jul 29, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon EC2Amazon EC2TableauTableauPowerBIPowerBI

We need to perform ETL from several databases into a data warehouse or data lake. We want to

  • keep raw and transformed data available to users to draft their own queries efficiently
  • give users the ability to give custom permissions and SSO
  • move between open-source on-premises development and cloud-based production environments

We want to use inexpensive Amazon EC2 instances only on medium-sized data set 16GB to 32GB feeding into Tableau Server or PowerBI for reporting and data analysis purposes.

319k views319k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
Aerospike
Aerospike

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

Optimized for Data Warehousing- It uses columnar storage, data compression, and zone maps to reduce the amount of IO needed to perform queries. Redshift has a massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture, parallelizing and distributing SQL operations to take advantage of all available resources.;Scalable- With a few clicks of the AWS Management Console or a simple API call, you can easily scale the number of nodes in your data warehouse up or down as your performance or capacity needs change.;No Up-Front Costs- You pay only for the resources you provision. You can choose On-Demand pricing with no up-front costs or long-term commitments, or obtain significantly discounted rates with Reserved Instance pricing.;Fault Tolerant- Amazon Redshift has multiple features that enhance the reliability of your data warehouse cluster. All data written to a node in your cluster is automatically replicated to other nodes within the cluster and all data is continuously backed up to Amazon S3.;SQL - Amazon Redshift is a SQL data warehouse and uses industry standard ODBC and JDBC connections and Postgres drivers.;Isolation - Amazon Redshift enables you to configure firewall rules to control network access to your data warehouse cluster.;Encryption – With just a couple of parameter settings, you can set up Amazon Redshift to use SSL to secure data in transit and hardware-acccelerated AES-256 encryption for data at rest.<br>
99% of reads/writes complete in under 1 millisecond.;Predictable low latency at high throughput – second to none. Read the YCSB Benchmark.;The secret sauce? A thousand things done right. Server code in ‘C’ (not Java or Erlang) precisely tuned to avoid context switching and memory copies. Highly parallelized multi-threaded, multi-core, multi-cpu, multi-SSD execution.;Indexes are always stored in RAM. Pure RAM mode is backed by spinning disks. In hybrid mode, individual tables are stored in either RAM or flash.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
196
Stacks
1.5K
Stacks
200
Followers
1.4K
Followers
288
Votes
108
Votes
48
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 41
    Data Warehousing
  • 27
    Scalable
  • 17
    SQL
  • 14
    Backed by Amazon
  • 5
    Encryption
Pros
  • 16
    Ram and/or ssd persistence
  • 12
    Easy clustering support
  • 5
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Acid
  • 3
    Performance better than Redis
Integrations
SQLite
SQLite
MySQL
MySQL
Oracle PL/SQL
Oracle PL/SQL
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Amazon Redshift, Aerospike?

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

Altiscale

Altiscale

we run Apache Hadoop for you. We not only deploy Hadoop, we monitor, manage, fix, and update it for you. Then we take it a step further: We monitor your jobs, notify you when something’s wrong with them, and can help with tuning.

Snowflake

Snowflake

Snowflake eliminates the administration and management demands of traditional data warehouses and big data platforms. Snowflake is a true data warehouse as a service running on Amazon Web Services (AWS)—no infrastructure to manage and no knobs to turn.

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase