StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. AIOHTTP vs Django

AIOHTTP vs Django

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Django
Django
Stacks38.7K
Followers34.8K
Votes4.2K
GitHub Stars85.6K
Forks33.2K
AIOHTTP
AIOHTTP
Stacks125
Followers143
Votes0
GitHub Stars16.1K
Forks2.2K

AIOHTTP vs Django: What are the differences?

Comparison between AIOHTTP and Django

1. Modular vs. Monolithic: AIOHTTP is a modular web framework that allows developers to use only the components they need, resulting in more lightweight and customizable applications. On the other hand, Django is a monolithic framework that comes with a predefined set of features and functionalities, providing a more comprehensive out-of-the-box solution.

2. Asynchronous vs. Synchronous: AIOHTTP is designed with an asynchronous architecture, making it suitable for handling high-concurrency applications that require non-blocking I/O operations. In contrast, Django operates synchronously by default, which can limit scalability in applications that need to handle a large number of simultaneous connections.

3. Scope of Use: AIOHTTP is often preferred for building APIs, microservices, and real-time applications due to its asynchronous nature and lightweight design. Django, on the other hand, is well-suited for developing full-fledged web applications with features like built-in ORM, authentication, admin interface, and more.

4. Learning Curve: AIOHTTP follows a more minimalist approach, making it easier for developers familiar with asynchronous programming to quickly get started. Django, with its extensive set of features and conventions, has a steeper learning curve for beginners but provides more tools and utilities out of the box for rapid development.

5. Community and Ecosystem: Django has a larger and more mature community with a vast ecosystem of third-party packages and plugins available, which can expedite development and offer solutions to various requirements. AIOHTTP, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community and ecosystem in comparison.

6. Performance: AIOHTTP, being asynchronous, can provide better performance in certain cases like handling a large number of clients concurrently. Django, by default, operates synchronously, which might not be as efficient for specific use cases requiring high performance and scalability.

In Summary, AIOHTTP and Django differ in modularity, asynchronous/synchronous nature, scope of use, learning curve, community size, and performance characteristics, catering to different development needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Django, AIOHTTP

Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Decided

Since I came from python I had two choices: #django or #flask. It felt like it was a better idea to go for #django considering I was building a blogging platform, this is kind of what #django was made for. On the other hand, #rails seems to be a fantastic framework to get things done. Although I do not regret any of my time spent on developing with #django I want to give @{#rails}|topic:null| a try some day in the future for the sake of curiosity.

438k views438k
Comments
Sandeep
Sandeep

Jun 13, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonJavaScriptJavaScriptJinjaJinja

I have learned both Python and JavaScript. I also tried my hand at Django. But i found it difficult to work with Django, on frontend its Jinja format is very confusing and limited. I have not tried Node.js yet and unsure which tool to go ahead with. I want an internship as soon as possible so please answer keeping that in mind.

599k views599k
Comments
Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Django
Django
AIOHTTP
AIOHTTP

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

It is an Async http client/server framework. It supports both client and server Web-Sockets out-of-the-box and avoids Callback. It provides Web-server with middlewares and pluggable routing.

-
asyncio; client; server;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
85.6K
GitHub Stars
16.1K
GitHub Forks
33.2K
GitHub Forks
2.2K
Stacks
38.7K
Stacks
125
Followers
34.8K
Followers
143
Votes
4.2K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 678
    Rapid development
  • 488
    Open source
  • 426
    Great community
  • 380
    Easy to learn
  • 277
    Mvc
Cons
  • 26
    Underpowered templating
  • 22
    Underpowered ORM
  • 22
    Autoreload restarts whole server
  • 15
    URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
  • 10
    Internal subcomponents coupling
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Python
Python
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Django, AIOHTTP?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase