AIOHTTP vs Javalin

Overview

AIOHTTP

Stacks125

Followers143

Votes0

GitHub Stars16.1K

Forks2.2K

Javalin

Stacks30

Followers64

Votes3

AIOHTTP vs Javalin: What are the differences?

AIOHTTP vs Javalin

AIOHTTP is a Python web framework that is specifically designed for handling HTTP requests and responses asynchronously, using asynchronous I/O operations. On the other hand, Javalin is a lightweight Java and Kotlin web framework that focuses on simplicity and ease of use for building web applications.

Programming language: A key difference between AIOHTTP and Javalin is the programming language they are designed for. AIOHTTP is designed for Python, while Javalin is designed for Java and Kotlin. This difference in programming languages can greatly influence the choice of framework based on the language preference of the developers.
Asynchronous I/O operations: AIOHTTP is built to handle asynchronous I/O operations, which allows for better performance and scalability in handling multiple concurrent requests. Javalin, on the other hand, does not focus on asynchronous I/O operations as its primary feature. This means that AIOHTTP might be a better choice for applications that require a high level of concurrency.
Middleware support: AIOHTTP has built-in support for middleware, which allows developers to add additional functionality to their application easily. Javalin, on the other hand, does not have built-in middleware support, making it less flexible in terms of extending the functionality of the framework.
Documentation and community: AIOHTTP has a well-documented API and an active community that provides support, tutorials, and resources for developers using the framework. Javalin also has good documentation, but its community may not be as extensive as AIOHTTP, which could impact the amount of available resources and support for developers.
Ease of use and learning curve: Javalin is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a good choice for developers who want to quickly get started with building web applications. AIOHTTP, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve due to its focus on asynchronous I/O operations and more advanced features.
Performance and scalability: Due to its emphasis on asynchronous I/O operations, AIOHTTP may offer better performance and scalability compared to Javalin, especially in scenarios where handling multiple concurrent requests is crucial.

In Summary, AIOHTTP and Javalin differ in terms of programming language support, asynchronous I/O operations, middleware support, documentation and community, ease of use, and performance and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on AIOHTTP, Javalin

Juan José

May 1, 2020

Decided

I developed Hexagon heavily inspired in these great tools because of the following reasons:

Take full advantage of the Kotlin programming language without any strings attached to Java (as a language).
I wanted to be able to replace the HTTP server library used with different adapters (Jetty, Netty, etc.) and though right now there is only one, more are coming.
Have a complete tool to do full applications, though you can use other libraries, Hexagon comes with a dependency injection helper, settings loading from different sources and HTTP Client, so it comes with (batteries included).

Right now I'm using it for my pet projects, and I'm happy with it.

35.9k views35.9k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

AIOHTTP	Javalin
It is an Async http client/server framework. It supports both client and server Web-Sockets out-of-the-box and avoids Callback. It provides Web-server with middlewares and pluggable routing.	Javalin started as a fork of the Spark framework but quickly turned into a ground-up rewrite influenced by express.js. Both of these web frameworks are inspired by the modern micro web framework grandfather: Sinatra, so if you’re coming from Ruby then Javalin shouldn’t feel too unfamiliar.
asyncio; client; server;	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 16.1K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 125	Stacks 30
Followers 143	Followers 64
Votes 0	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 1 Does not require IDEA plugins 1 Rich support of template engines 1 Lightweight
Integrations
No integrations available	Kotlin Java

What are some alternatives to AIOHTTP, Javalin?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

AIOHTTP vs Javalin: What are the differences?

AIOHTTP vs Javalin

Programming language: A key difference between AIOHTTP and Javalin is the programming language they are designed for. AIOHTTP is designed for Python, while Javalin is designed for Java and Kotlin. This difference in programming languages can greatly influence the choice of framework based on the language preference of the developers.
Asynchronous I/O operations: AIOHTTP is built to handle asynchronous I/O operations, which allows for better performance and scalability in handling multiple concurrent requests. Javalin, on the other hand, does not focus on asynchronous I/O operations as its primary feature. This means that AIOHTTP might be a better choice for applications that require a high level of concurrency.
Middleware support: AIOHTTP has built-in support for middleware, which allows developers to add additional functionality to their application easily. Javalin, on the other hand, does not have built-in middleware support, making it less flexible in terms of extending the functionality of the framework.
Documentation and community: AIOHTTP has a well-documented API and an active community that provides support, tutorials, and resources for developers using the framework. Javalin also has good documentation, but its community may not be as extensive as AIOHTTP, which could impact the amount of available resources and support for developers.
Ease of use and learning curve: Javalin is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a good choice for developers who want to quickly get started with building web applications. AIOHTTP, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve due to its focus on asynchronous I/O operations and more advanced features.
Performance and scalability: Due to its emphasis on asynchronous I/O operations, AIOHTTP may offer better performance and scalability compared to Javalin, especially in scenarios where handling multiple concurrent requests is crucial.

AIOHTTP vs Javalin

Overview

AIOHTTP vs Javalin: What are the differences?