Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Akka HTTP

54
49
+ 1
0
Flask

19.2K
16.1K
+ 1
60
Add tool

Flask vs Akka HTTP: What are the differences?

Developers describe Flask as "a microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions". Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind. On the other hand, Akka HTTP is detailed as "HTTP client and server built on Akka actors and streams". The Akka HTTP modules implement a full server- and client-side HTTP stack on top of akka-actor and akka-stream. It’s not a web-framework but rather a more general toolkit for providing and consuming HTTP-based services. While interaction with a browser is of course also in scope it is not the primary focus of Akka HTTP.

Flask and Akka HTTP belong to "Microframeworks (Backend)" category of the tech stack.

Flask is an open source tool with 50.5K GitHub stars and 13.5K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Flask's open source repository on GitHub.

Advice on Akka HTTP and Flask
kristan-dev
Senior Solutions Analyst · | 8 upvotes · 388.5K views

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

See more
Replies (1)
Rafael Torres
Technical Lead at 4Agile · | 9 upvotes · 378.5K views

If you want to be a Web developer with knowledge in another frontend and NoSql technology, maybe continue with Flask. However, if you want to create very fast solutions to grow up with a new business and merge these with data analysis and other tools, Django is the answer. Basically read more about the service architecture where you feel more comfortable, Microservice or Monolithic, but please will not married with any because they solve issues to different contexts.

See more
Girish Sharma
Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems · | 6 upvotes · 307.9K views
Needs advice
on
BottleBottleFlaskFlask
and
NamekoNameko

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
BottleBottle

Bottle is much less bloated and fast. Its built-in templating system is one of the fastest as it compiles the templates in bytecode. Also Bottle has no depenencies, preventing dependency bloat.

See more
Saurav Pandit
Application Devloper at Bny Mellon · | 6 upvotes · 334.3K views

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
FlaskFlask
at

For starters flask provides a beautiful and easy way to create REST APIs. Also its supported by excellent beginner docs as well as a very active community. Another good thing with Flask is its widely available list of plugins which allow you to build as you go. Its also good in performance and can scale to a quite decent level. However, if you are sure your project is going to be fairly big, it would be better to start with Django as it provides a lot of features out of the box and is extremely stable in performance. Both these frameworks have support for Swagger, JWT, Coverage Report although you have to install plugins for them. Deploying both of these are fairly simple and there is huge documentation available. Django has one of the best documentations I have come across. I hope I was able to answer your queries.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Akka HTTP
Pros of Flask
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 10
      For it flexibility
    • 9
      Flexibilty and easy to use
    • 7
      User friendly
    • 6
      Secured
    • 5
      Unopinionated
    • 2
      Secure
    • 2
      Customizable
    • 1
      Simple to use
    • 1
      Powerful
    • 1
      Rapid development
    • 1
      Flask
    • 1
      Easy to get started
    • 1
      Easy to develop and maintain applications
    • 1
      Easy to setup and get it going
    • 1
      Easy to use
    • 1
      Documentation
    • 1
      Beautiful code
    • 1
      Orm
    • 1
      Not JS
    • 1
      Perfect for small to large projects with superb docs.
    • 1
      Easy to integrate
    • 1
      Speed
    • 1
      Get started quickly
    • 1
      Python
    • 1
      Minimal
    • 1
      Lightweight
    • 0
      Flexibilty
    • 0
      Well designed
    • 0
      Productive
    • 0
      Awesome
    • 0
      Open source
    • 0
      Expressive
    • 0
      Love it

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Akka HTTP
    Cons of Flask
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 10
        Not JS
      • 7
        Context
      • 5
        Not fast
      • 1
        Don't has many module as in spring

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Akka HTTP?

      The Akka HTTP modules implement a full server- and client-side HTTP stack on top of akka-actor and akka-stream. It’s not a web-framework but rather a more general toolkit for providing and consuming HTTP-based services. While interaction with a browser is of course also in scope it is not the primary focus of Akka HTTP.

      What is Flask?

      Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      Jobs that mention Akka HTTP and Flask as a desired skillset
      What companies use Akka HTTP?
      What companies use Flask?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Akka HTTP?
      What tools integrate with Flask?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to Akka HTTP and Flask?
      Play
      Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.
      Spring Boot
      Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.
      Netty
      Netty is a NIO client server framework which enables quick and easy development of network applications such as protocol servers and clients. It greatly simplifies and streamlines network programming such as TCP and UDP socket server.
      Apache Tomcat
      Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.
      JavaScript
      JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
      See all alternatives