Akka HTTP vs Starlette

Overview

Akka HTTP

Stacks54

Followers49

Votes0

Starlette

Stacks44

Followers21

Votes0

Akka HTTP vs Starlette: What are the differences?

Concurrency Model: Akka HTTP uses an actor-based concurrency model provided by Akka toolkit, allowing for efficient handling of concurrent requests using lightweight, isolated actors. On the other hand, Starlette adopts an asynchronous model leveraging Python's async/await syntax for handling concurrency, making it a suitable choice for async-based applications.
Framework Ecosystem: Akka HTTP is integrated with Akka toolkit for building distributed systems, which provides features like clustering, sharding, and persistence. In contrast, Starlette is a lightweight framework focused on web applications and APIs, making it easier to set up and deploy without the complexities of a full-fledged distributed systems framework.
Language Support: Akka HTTP is primarily built for Scala, with support for Java as well, allowing developers to take advantage of the actor model in a statically-typed functional programming paradigm. Starlette, on the other hand, is built with Python, offering a more dynamic and flexible development experience for Python developers accustomed to its syntax and ecosystem.
Performance Optimization: Akka HTTP is known for its high-performance capabilities, especially in handling a large number of concurrent connections and requests efficiently. Starlette, while offering decent performance, may not be as optimized for extreme scalability and performance as Akka HTTP due to the underlying language differences and framework design choices.
Community and Support: The Akka community is well-established with a strong backing from Lightbend, the company behind Akka toolkit, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support for developers. On the other hand, Starlette, being a newer framework, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for developers seeking help and guidance.
Integration with Other Systems: Akka HTTP offers seamless integration with other Akka-based systems and libraries, making it a preferred choice for building complex distributed applications within the Akka ecosystem. In comparison, Starlette's lightweight design may make it easier to integrate with a broader range of Python libraries and systems outside the web development domain.

In Summary, Akka HTTP and Starlette differ in their concurrency model, framework ecosystem, language support, performance optimization, community support, and integration capabilities, catering to distinct use cases in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Akka HTTP	Starlette
The Akka HTTP modules implement a full server- and client-side HTTP stack on top of akka-actor and akka-stream. It’s not a web-framework but rather a more general toolkit for providing and consuming HTTP-based services. While interaction with a browser is of course also in scope it is not the primary focus of Akka HTTP.	It is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit, which is ideal for building high performance asyncio services.
Full server- and client-side HTTP stack; Toolkit for providing and consuming HTTP-based services	Seriously impressive performance; WebSocket support; GraphQL support; In-process background tasks; Startup and shutdown events; Test client built on requests; CORS, GZip, Static Files, Streaming responses; Session and Cookie support
Statistics
Stacks 54	Stacks 44
Followers 49	Followers 21
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Java Scala	GraphQL

What are some alternatives to Akka HTTP, Starlette?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Akka HTTP vs Starlette: What are the differences?

Concurrency Model: Akka HTTP uses an actor-based concurrency model provided by Akka toolkit, allowing for efficient handling of concurrent requests using lightweight, isolated actors. On the other hand, Starlette adopts an asynchronous model leveraging Python's async/await syntax for handling concurrency, making it a suitable choice for async-based applications.
Framework Ecosystem: Akka HTTP is integrated with Akka toolkit for building distributed systems, which provides features like clustering, sharding, and persistence. In contrast, Starlette is a lightweight framework focused on web applications and APIs, making it easier to set up and deploy without the complexities of a full-fledged distributed systems framework.
Language Support: Akka HTTP is primarily built for Scala, with support for Java as well, allowing developers to take advantage of the actor model in a statically-typed functional programming paradigm. Starlette, on the other hand, is built with Python, offering a more dynamic and flexible development experience for Python developers accustomed to its syntax and ecosystem.
Performance Optimization: Akka HTTP is known for its high-performance capabilities, especially in handling a large number of concurrent connections and requests efficiently. Starlette, while offering decent performance, may not be as optimized for extreme scalability and performance as Akka HTTP due to the underlying language differences and framework design choices.
Community and Support: The Akka community is well-established with a strong backing from Lightbend, the company behind Akka toolkit, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support for developers. On the other hand, Starlette, being a newer framework, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for developers seeking help and guidance.
Integration with Other Systems: Akka HTTP offers seamless integration with other Akka-based systems and libraries, making it a preferred choice for building complex distributed applications within the Akka ecosystem. In comparison, Starlette's lightweight design may make it easier to integrate with a broader range of Python libraries and systems outside the web development domain.

Akka HTTP vs Starlette

Overview