Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon Athena

496
838
+ 1
49
Hue

55
98
+ 1
0
Add tool

Amazon Athena vs Hue: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Amazon Athena and Hue. These two tools are commonly used for data analytics and processing in the big data domain. Understanding their differences will help users choose the right tool for their specific requirements.

  1. Pricing model: Amazon Athena is a serverless, pay-as-you-go service that charges based on the amount of data scanned during query execution. On the other hand, Hue is an open-source web-based interface that is free to use. The pricing model of Athena may be more suitable for users who want to scale the cost based on their usage.

  2. Data source compatibility: Amazon Athena supports querying data stored in Amazon S3 using standard SQL queries, making it compatible with a wide range of data formats. Hue, on the other hand, can connect to various data sources such as Apache Hive, Impala, and more. This difference in compatibility allows Athena users to leverage the benefits of Amazon S3, while Hue users can access data from multiple sources.

  3. User interface: Hue provides a comprehensive user interface that allows users to interact with big data tools through a single interface. It offers a visual query builder, file browser, job scheduler, and other features. Amazon Athena, on the other hand, primarily relies on query execution through SQL queries submitted via the AWS Management Console or API. The user interface provided by Hue may be more convenient for users who prefer a visual and interactive experience.

  4. Integration with other AWS services: Amazon Athena seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, such as AWS Glue for data cataloging and AWS S3 for data storage. This integration enables users to build end-to-end data pipelines and leverage the full suite of AWS services. Hue, being an open-source tool, may require additional configuration and setup to integrate with AWS services. This difference in integration capabilities can influence the choice of tool depending on the user's AWS ecosystem.

  5. Data governance and security: Amazon Athena offers fine-grained access control and encryption options for securing data and complying with industry regulations. Moreover, it integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for user authentication and authorization. While Hue does provide security and authentication features, its capabilities may be more limited compared to the extensive security features of Amazon Athena.

  6. Support and documentation: Amazon Athena is a managed service provided by AWS, which means users can take advantage of AWS's support and documentation resources. On the other hand, Hue being an open-source tool, relies on community support and may not have the same level of professional assistance available. This difference in support and documentation can influence the level of assistance and ease of troubleshooting for users.

In Summary, Amazon Athena and Hue differ in terms of their pricing model, data source compatibility, user interface, integration with other AWS services, data governance and security features, as well as support and documentation. Choosing between these tools depends on specific requirements, preferences, and the existing infrastructure and ecosystem of the user.

Advice on Amazon Athena and Hue

Hi all,

Currently, we need to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to DB either Amazon Athena or Amazon Redshift. But the problem with the data is, it is in .PSV (pipe separated values) format and the size is also above 200 GB. The query performance of the timeout in Athena/Redshift is not up to the mark, too slow while compared to Google BigQuery. How would I optimize the performance and query result time? Can anyone please help me out?

See more
Replies (4)

you can use aws glue service to convert you pipe format data to parquet format , and thus you can achieve data compression . Now you should choose Redshift to copy your data as it is very huge. To manage your data, you should partition your data in S3 bucket and also divide your data across the redshift cluster

See more
Carlos Acedo
Data Technologies Manager at SDG Group Iberia · | 5 upvotes · 249K views
Recommends
on
Amazon RedshiftAmazon Redshift

First of all you should make your choice upon Redshift or Athena based on your use case since they are two very diferent services - Redshift is an enterprise-grade MPP Data Warehouse while Athena is a SQL layer on top of S3 with limited performance. If performance is a key factor, users are going to execute unpredictable queries and direct and managing costs are not a problem I'd definitely go for Redshift. If performance is not so critical and queries will be predictable somewhat I'd go for Athena.

Once you select the technology you'll need to optimize your data in order to get the queries executed as fast as possible. In both cases you may need to adapt the data model to fit your queries better. In the case you go for Athena you'd also proabably need to change your file format to Parquet or Avro and review your partition strategy depending on your most frequent type of query. If you choose Redshift you'll need to ingest the data from your files into it and maybe carry out some tuning tasks for performance gain.

I'll recommend Redshift for now since it can address a wider range of use cases, but we could give you better advice if you described your use case in depth.

See more
Alexis Blandin
Recommends
on
Amazon AthenaAmazon Athena

It depend of the nature of your data (structured or not?) and of course your queries (ad-hoc or predictible?). For example you can look at partitioning and columnar format to maximize MPP capabilities for both Athena and Redshift

See more
Recommends

you can change your PSV fomat data to parquet file format with AWS GLUE and then your query performance will be improved

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Amazon Athena
Pros of Hue
  • 16
    Use SQL to analyze CSV files
  • 8
    Glue crawlers gives easy Data catalogue
  • 7
    Cheap
  • 6
    Query all my data without running servers 24x7
  • 4
    No data base servers yay
  • 3
    Easy integration with QuickSight
  • 2
    Query and analyse CSV,parquet,json files in sql
  • 2
    Also glue and athena use same data catalog
  • 1
    No configuration required
  • 0
    Ad hoc checks on data made easy
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is Amazon Athena?

    Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

    What is Hue?

    It is open source and lets regular users import their big data, query it, search it, visualize it and build dashboards on top of it, all from their browser.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Amazon Athena?
    What companies use Hue?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Amazon Athena?
    What tools integrate with Hue?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      Aug 28 2019 at 3:10AM

      Segment

      PythonJavaAmazon S3+16
      7
      2623
      Jul 2 2019 at 9:34PM

      Segment

      Google AnalyticsAmazon S3New Relic+25
      10
      6880
      What are some alternatives to Amazon Athena and Hue?
      Presto
      Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data
      Amazon Redshift Spectrum
      With Redshift Spectrum, you can extend the analytic power of Amazon Redshift beyond data stored on local disks in your data warehouse to query vast amounts of unstructured data in your Amazon S3 “data lake” -- without having to load or transform any data.
      Amazon Redshift
      It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.
      Cassandra
      Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.
      Spectrum
      The community platform for the future.
      See all alternatives