Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon Athena vs Hue: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Amazon Athena and Hue. These two tools are commonly used for data analytics and processing in the big data domain. Understanding their differences will help users choose the right tool for their specific requirements.
Pricing model: Amazon Athena is a serverless, pay-as-you-go service that charges based on the amount of data scanned during query execution. On the other hand, Hue is an open-source web-based interface that is free to use. The pricing model of Athena may be more suitable for users who want to scale the cost based on their usage.
Data source compatibility: Amazon Athena supports querying data stored in Amazon S3 using standard SQL queries, making it compatible with a wide range of data formats. Hue, on the other hand, can connect to various data sources such as Apache Hive, Impala, and more. This difference in compatibility allows Athena users to leverage the benefits of Amazon S3, while Hue users can access data from multiple sources.
User interface: Hue provides a comprehensive user interface that allows users to interact with big data tools through a single interface. It offers a visual query builder, file browser, job scheduler, and other features. Amazon Athena, on the other hand, primarily relies on query execution through SQL queries submitted via the AWS Management Console or API. The user interface provided by Hue may be more convenient for users who prefer a visual and interactive experience.
Integration with other AWS services: Amazon Athena seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, such as AWS Glue for data cataloging and AWS S3 for data storage. This integration enables users to build end-to-end data pipelines and leverage the full suite of AWS services. Hue, being an open-source tool, may require additional configuration and setup to integrate with AWS services. This difference in integration capabilities can influence the choice of tool depending on the user's AWS ecosystem.
Data governance and security: Amazon Athena offers fine-grained access control and encryption options for securing data and complying with industry regulations. Moreover, it integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for user authentication and authorization. While Hue does provide security and authentication features, its capabilities may be more limited compared to the extensive security features of Amazon Athena.
Support and documentation: Amazon Athena is a managed service provided by AWS, which means users can take advantage of AWS's support and documentation resources. On the other hand, Hue being an open-source tool, relies on community support and may not have the same level of professional assistance available. This difference in support and documentation can influence the level of assistance and ease of troubleshooting for users.
In Summary, Amazon Athena and Hue differ in terms of their pricing model, data source compatibility, user interface, integration with other AWS services, data governance and security features, as well as support and documentation. Choosing between these tools depends on specific requirements, preferences, and the existing infrastructure and ecosystem of the user.
Hi all,
Currently, we need to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to DB either Amazon Athena or Amazon Redshift. But the problem with the data is, it is in .PSV (pipe separated values) format and the size is also above 200 GB. The query performance of the timeout in Athena/Redshift is not up to the mark, too slow while compared to Google BigQuery. How would I optimize the performance and query result time? Can anyone please help me out?
you can use aws glue service to convert you pipe format data to parquet format , and thus you can achieve data compression . Now you should choose Redshift to copy your data as it is very huge. To manage your data, you should partition your data in S3 bucket and also divide your data across the redshift cluster
First of all you should make your choice upon Redshift or Athena based on your use case since they are two very diferent services - Redshift is an enterprise-grade MPP Data Warehouse while Athena is a SQL layer on top of S3 with limited performance. If performance is a key factor, users are going to execute unpredictable queries and direct and managing costs are not a problem I'd definitely go for Redshift. If performance is not so critical and queries will be predictable somewhat I'd go for Athena.
Once you select the technology you'll need to optimize your data in order to get the queries executed as fast as possible. In both cases you may need to adapt the data model to fit your queries better. In the case you go for Athena you'd also proabably need to change your file format to Parquet or Avro and review your partition strategy depending on your most frequent type of query. If you choose Redshift you'll need to ingest the data from your files into it and maybe carry out some tuning tasks for performance gain.
I'll recommend Redshift for now since it can address a wider range of use cases, but we could give you better advice if you described your use case in depth.
It depend of the nature of your data (structured or not?) and of course your queries (ad-hoc or predictible?). For example you can look at partitioning and columnar format to maximize MPP capabilities for both Athena and Redshift
you can change your PSV fomat data to parquet file format with AWS GLUE and then your query performance will be improved
Pros of Amazon Athena
- Use SQL to analyze CSV files16
- Glue crawlers gives easy Data catalogue8
- Cheap7
- Query all my data without running servers 24x76
- No data base servers yay4
- Easy integration with QuickSight3
- Query and analyse CSV,parquet,json files in sql2
- Also glue and athena use same data catalog2
- No configuration required1
- Ad hoc checks on data made easy0