StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Relational Databases
  4. SQL Database As A Service
  5. Amazon RDS vs Amazon RDS for Aurora vs DigitalOcean Managed Databases

Amazon RDS vs Amazon RDS for Aurora vs DigitalOcean Managed Databases

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon RDS
Amazon RDS
Stacks16.2K
Followers10.8K
Votes761
Amazon Aurora
Amazon Aurora
Stacks807
Followers745
Votes55
DigitalOcean Managed Databases
DigitalOcean Managed Databases
Stacks64
Followers67
Votes0

Amazon RDS vs Amazon RDS for Aurora vs DigitalOcean Managed Databases: What are the differences?

Write Introduction here

1. **Cost**: Amazon RDS offers various database engines at different price points, while Amazon RDS for Aurora is a more cost-effective option specifically designed for the Aurora database engine. DigitalOcean Managed Databases provides a transparent pricing model with no hidden fees, making it easy to calculate costs without surprises.

2. **Performance**: Amazon RDS for Aurora is known for its high-performance capabilities, offering up to five times the throughput of standard MySQL or PostgreSQL databases. DigitalOcean Managed Databases provides good performance for small to medium-sized applications but may not scale as effectively for high-demand workloads as Amazon RDS for Aurora.

3. **Availability and durability**: Amazon RDS offers Multi-AZ deployments and automated backups for high availability and data durability. Amazon RDS for Aurora enhances this by providing even greater availability and durability due to its distributed nature. DigitalOcean Managed Databases also offers high availability through replicas but may not match the level of durability provided by Aurora.

4. **Scalability**: Both Amazon RDS and Amazon RDS for Aurora offer scalable options, allowing users to easily resize their database instances. DigitalOcean Managed Databases also provides scalability features but may not be as flexible in terms of performance tuning compared to Amazon RDS for Aurora.

5. **Integration with other AWS services**: Amazon RDS seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like EC2, IAM, CloudWatch, and more, making it a popular choice for users within the AWS ecosystem. Amazon RDS for Aurora further enhances this integration, offering better compatibility and performance optimizations when used with other AWS services. While DigitalOcean Managed Databases provides good standalone database solutions, it may not have the same level of integration options with external services.

6. **Managed services and support**: Both Amazon RDS and Amazon RDS for Aurora are fully managed services, including routine maintenance tasks, backups, and security patching. DigitalOcean Managed Databases also offers a managed service but may have slightly fewer automation features compared to the AWS offerings.

In Summary, Amazon RDS for Aurora provides a cost-effective, high-performance, highly available, and scalable database solution with strong integration capabilities within the AWS ecosystem, while DigitalOcean Managed Databases offers a simpler pricing model and good performance for small to medium-sized applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon RDS
Amazon RDS
Amazon Aurora
Amazon Aurora
DigitalOcean Managed Databases
DigitalOcean Managed Databases

Amazon RDS gives you access to the capabilities of a familiar MySQL, Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server database engine. This means that the code, applications, and tools you already use today with your existing databases can be used with Amazon RDS. Amazon RDS automatically patches the database software and backs up your database, storing the backups for a user-defined retention period and enabling point-in-time recovery. You benefit from the flexibility of being able to scale the compute resources or storage capacity associated with your Database Instance (DB Instance) via a single API call.

Amazon Aurora is a MySQL-compatible, relational database engine that combines the speed and availability of high-end commercial databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases. Amazon Aurora provides up to five times better performance than MySQL at a price point one tenth that of a commercial database while delivering similar performance and availability.

Build apps and store data in minutes with easy access to one or more databases and sleep better knowing your data is backed up and optimized.

Pre-configured Parameters;Monitoring and Metrics;Automatic Software Patching;Automated Backups;DB Snapshots;DB Event Notifications;Multi-Availability Zone (Multi-AZ) Deployments;Provisioned IOPS;Push-Button Scaling;Automatic Host Replacement;Replication;Isolation and Security
High Throughput with Low Jitter;Push-button Compute Scaling;Storage Auto-scaling;Amazon Aurora Replicas;Instance Monitoring and Repair;Fault-tolerant and Self-healing Storage;Automatic, Continuous, Incremental Backups and Point-in-time Restore;Database Snapshots;Resource-level Permissions;Easy Migration;Monitoring and Metrics
Multi-node database clustering;Automated failover support;Daily backups with Point in Time Recovery (7 days);Horizontal read scaling;Data encrypted on disk and network;Performance graphs (per minute);Multiple logical databases per cluster;Database cluster forks;Connection pooling;One-click upgrades to new versions;Seamless switching of plans and regions;All Regions except AMS2, NYC2, SFO1 and SGP1
Statistics
Stacks
16.2K
Stacks
807
Stacks
64
Followers
10.8K
Followers
745
Followers
67
Votes
761
Votes
55
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 165
    Reliable failovers
  • 156
    Automated backups
  • 130
    Backed by amazon
  • 92
    Db snapshots
  • 87
    Multi-availability
Pros
  • 14
    MySQL compatibility
  • 12
    Better performance
  • 10
    Easy read scalability
  • 9
    Speed
  • 7
    Low latency read replica
Cons
  • 2
    Vendor locking
  • 1
    Rigid schema
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Amazon RDS, Amazon Aurora, DigitalOcean Managed Databases?

Google Cloud SQL

Google Cloud SQL

Run the same relational databases you know with their rich extension collections, configuration flags and developer ecosystem, but without the hassle of self management.

ClearDB

ClearDB

ClearDB uses a combination of advanced replication techniques, advanced cluster technology, and layered web services to provide you with a MySQL database that is "smarter" than usual.

Azure SQL Database

Azure SQL Database

It is the intelligent, scalable, cloud database service that provides the broadest SQL Server engine compatibility and up to a 212% return on investment. It is a database service that can quickly and efficiently scale to meet demand, is automatically highly available, and supports a variety of third party software.

Cloud DB for Mysql

Cloud DB for Mysql

It is a fully managed cloud cache service that enables you to easily configure a MySQL database with a few settings and clicks and operate it reliably with NAVER's optimization settings, and that automatically recovers from failures.

PlanetScaleDB

PlanetScaleDB

It is a fully managed cloud native database-as-a-service built on Vitess and Kubernetes. A MySQL compatible highly scalable database. Effortlessly deploy, manage, and monitor your databases in multiple regions and across cloud providers.

Azure Database for MySQL

Azure Database for MySQL

Azure Database for MySQL provides a managed database service for app development and deployment that allows you to stand up a MySQL database in minutes and scale on the fly – on the cloud you trust most.

Books

Books

It is an immutable double-entry accounting database service. It supports many clients and businesses at global scale, leaning on Google Cloud Spanner and Google Kubernetes Engine to make that possible.

Aiven

Aiven

A fully-managed and hosted database as a service (DBaaS) that provides enterprises of every size access to secure and scalable open-source database and messaging services on all major clouds across the globe.

Amazon Aurora Serverless

Amazon Aurora Serverless

It is an on-demand, autoscaling configuration for Amazon Aurora. It automatically starts up, shuts down, and scales capacity up or down based on your application's needs. You can run your database on AWS without managing database capacity.

Azure SQL Managed Instance

Azure SQL Managed Instance

It is the intelligent, scalable cloud database service that combines the broadest SQL Server database engine compatibility with all the benefits of a fully managed and evergreen platform as a service.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase