Amazon Aurora vs Azure Database for MySQL

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon Aurora

818
743
+ 1
55
Azure Database for MySQL

41
107
+ 1
0
Add tool

Amazon RDS for Aurora vs Azure Database for MySQL: What are the differences?

Introduction

This article provides a comparison between Amazon RDS for Aurora and Azure Database for MySQL. Both are fully managed database services that offer high reliability and availability. Let's explore the key differences between these two services.

  1. Performance and Scalability: Amazon RDS for Aurora provides a highly scalable and performant database engine optimized for the cloud. It uses an SSD-based storage system and supports read replicas, enabling horizontal scalability. On the other hand, Azure Database for MySQL offers vertical scalability by allowing users to increase computing and storage resources of their databases. It doesn't support read replicas natively.

  2. Storage and Durability: Amazon RDS for Aurora employs a distributed and fault-tolerant storage system that replicates six copies of your data across three Availability Zones. It automatically handles backups and recovers data from failures. Azure Database for MySQL offers a similar storage mechanism, replicating data within a region with options for automated backups and restore points.

  3. Compatibility and Portability: Aurora is compatible with MySQL, which makes it easier to migrate existing MySQL applications to Aurora. It supports MySQL connectors, APIs, and tools. In comparison, Azure Database for MySQL is also compatible with MySQL and provides connectors and tools for seamless migration.

  4. Monitoring and Management: Amazon RDS for Aurora offers detailed monitoring metrics through Amazon CloudWatch and provides automated backups, software patching, and hardware upgrades. It also supports automated scaling. Azure Database for MySQL also provides monitoring metrics through Azure Monitor and offers automated backups. It supports automatic tuning, enabling performance optimizations.

  5. Pricing and Cost Models: Aurora offers different pricing models, including on-demand and reserved instances, which allow users to choose the most cost-effective option. It also provides a free tier for light workloads. Azure Database for MySQL offers similar pricing models, including pay-as-you-go and reserved instances, with a free tier for exploration and development.

  6. Ecosystem and Integration: Amazon RDS for Aurora is part of the larger AWS ecosystem, allowing easy integration with other AWS services. It provides features such as AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for secure access control and AWS Database Migration Service (DMS) for database migration. Azure Database for MySQL is part of the Azure ecosystem, providing seamless integration with other Azure services like Azure Active Directory and Azure Backup.

In summary, Amazon RDS for Aurora and Azure Database for MySQL differ in terms of scalability, storage mechanism, compatibility, monitoring capabilities, pricing models, and ecosystem integration. Each service has its own strengths and fits different use cases, so it's essential to evaluate your specific requirements before making a decision.

Decisions about Amazon Aurora and Azure Database for MySQL
Phillip Manwaring
Developer at Coach Align · | 5 upvotes · 29K views

Using on-demand read/write capacity while we scale our userbase - means that we're well within the free-tier on AWS while we scale the business and evaluate traffic patterns.

Using single-table design, which is dead simple using Jeremy Daly's dynamodb-toolbox library

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Amazon Aurora
Pros of Azure Database for MySQL
  • 14
    MySQL compatibility
  • 12
    Better performance
  • 10
    Easy read scalability
  • 9
    Speed
  • 7
    Low latency read replica
  • 2
    High IOPS cost
  • 1
    Good cost performance
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Amazon Aurora
    Cons of Azure Database for MySQL
    • 2
      Vendor locking
    • 1
      Rigid schema
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Amazon Aurora?

      Amazon Aurora is a MySQL-compatible, relational database engine that combines the speed and availability of high-end commercial databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases. Amazon Aurora provides up to five times better performance than MySQL at a price point one tenth that of a commercial database while delivering similar performance and availability.

      What is Azure Database for MySQL?

      Azure Database for MySQL provides a managed database service for app development and deployment that allows you to stand up a MySQL database in minutes and scale on the fly – on the cloud you trust most.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Amazon Aurora?
      What companies use Azure Database for MySQL?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Amazon Aurora?
      What tools integrate with Azure Database for MySQL?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      DockerAmazon EC2Scala+8
      6
      2845
      GitHubPythonNode.js+47
      55
      73164
      What are some alternatives to Amazon Aurora and Azure Database for MySQL?
      MySQL
      The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
      PostgreSQL
      PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.
      MongoDB
      MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
      Redis
      Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.
      Amazon S3
      Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
      See all alternatives