Amazon EMR vs SQLite: What are the differences?
Amazon EMR: Distribute your data and processing across a Amazon EC2 instances using Hadoop. Amazon EMR is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, web indexing, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics. Customers launch millions of Amazon EMR clusters every year; SQLite: A software library that implements a self-contained, serverless, zero-configuration, transactional SQL database engine. SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.
Amazon EMR can be classified as a tool in the "Big Data as a Service" category, while SQLite is grouped under "Databases".
"On demand processing power" is the primary reason why developers consider Amazon EMR over the competitors, whereas "Lightweight" was stated as the key factor in picking SQLite.
According to the StackShare community, SQLite has a broader approval, being mentioned in 314 company stacks & 477 developers stacks; compared to Amazon EMR, which is listed in 95 company stacks and 18 developer stacks.