StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Data Backup
  5. Amazon Glacier vs Cohesity

Amazon Glacier vs Cohesity

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon Glacier
Amazon Glacier
Stacks120
Followers97
Votes10
Cohesity
Cohesity
Stacks1
Followers4
Votes0

Amazon Glacier vs Cohesity: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Amazon Glacier and Cohesity

1. **Data Storage Model**: Amazon Glacier follows a pay-per-use storage model where customers pay based on the amount of data stored, while Cohesity offers a flat rate pricing model regardless of the data volume.
2. **Data Retrieval Time**: Amazon Glacier has retrieval times ranging from a few minutes to several hours based on the retrieval options chosen, while Cohesity provides near-instant data access for rapid recovery.
3. **Data Management Capabilities**: Amazon Glacier primarily focuses on data archiving and long-term storage with limited data management features, whereas Cohesity offers comprehensive data management capabilities, including data protection, disaster recovery, and data analytics.
4. **Integration with Cloud Services**: Amazon Glacier seamlessly integrates with other Amazon Web Services (AWS) for cloud-based solutions, while Cohesity provides integration with multiple cloud platforms and on-premises solutions for hybrid cloud operations.
5. **Security and Compliance Features**: Amazon Glacier offers encryption at rest and in transit but lacks advanced security features compared to Cohesity, which provides end-to-end data encryption, compliance reporting, and advanced security controls for regulatory requirements.
6. **Scalability and Performance**: Amazon Glacier is highly scalable but may have limitations in performance for large data volumes, while Cohesity offers scalable performance with distributed architecture to handle data growth efficiently.

In Summary, Amazon Glacier and Cohesity differ in terms of data storage model, data retrieval time, data management capabilities, integration with cloud services, security features, and scalability and performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Glacier
Amazon Glacier
Cohesity
Cohesity

In order to keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for data that is infrequently accessed and for which retrieval times of several hours are suitable. With Amazon Glacier, customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.01 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions.

It allows IT professionals to backup, manage and gain insights from their data, across multiple systems or cloud providers.

Low cost – Amazon Glacier is an extremely low-cost, pay-as-you-go storage service that can cost as little as $0.01 per gigabyte per month.;You store data in Amazon Glacier as archives. An archive can represent a single file or you may choose to combine several files to be uploaded as a single archive. Retrieving archives from Amazon Glacier requires the initiation of a job. Jobs typically complete in 3 to 5 hours. You organize your archives in vaults.;Secure – Amazon Glacier supports secure transfer of your data over Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and automatically stores data encrypted at rest using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) 256, a secure symmetric-key encryption standard using 256-bit encryption keys.;Durable – Amazon Glacier is designed to provide average annual durability of 99.999999999% for an archive. The service redundantly stores data in multiple facilities and on multiple devices within each facility.;Simple – Amazon Glacier allows you to offload the administrative burdens of operating and scaling archival storage to AWS, and makes retaining data for long periods, whether measured in years or decades, especially simple.
Consolidate data management silos with a single, web-scale solution; Solving mass data fragmentation; Protect your data from edge to cloud
Statistics
Stacks
120
Stacks
1
Followers
97
Followers
4
Votes
10
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Cold Storage
  • 3
    Easy Setup
  • 1
    Cheap
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Amazon Glacier, Cohesity?

restic

restic

It is a backup program that is fast, efficient and secure. It uses cryptography to guarantee the confidentiality and integrity of your data.

Veeam Backup & Replication

Veeam Backup & Replication

It is industry-leading Backup & Replication software. It delivers availability for all your cloud, virtual and physical workloads. Through a simple-by-design management console, you can easily achieve fast, flexible and reliable backup, recovery and replication for all your applications and data.

Borg

Borg

It is a deduplicating backup program. It provides an efficient and secure way to backup data. The data deduplication technique used makes it suitable for daily backups since only changes are stored. The authenticated encryption technique makes it suitable for backups to not fully trusted targets.

AWS Storage Gateway

AWS Storage Gateway

The AWS Storage Gateway is a service connecting an on-premises software appliance with cloud-based storage. Once the AWS Storage Gateway’s software appliance is installed on a local host, you can mount Storage Gateway volumes to your on-premises application servers as iSCSI devices, enabling a wide variety of systems and applications to make use of them. Data written to these volumes is maintained on your on-premises storage hardware while being asynchronously backed up to AWS, where it is stored in Amazon Glacier or in Amazon S3 in the form of Amazon EBS snapshots. Snapshots are encrypted to make sure that customers do not have to worry about encrypting sensitive data themselves. When customers need to retrieve data, they can restore snapshots locally, or create Amazon EBS volumes from snapshots for use with applications running in Amazon EC2. It provides low-latency performance by maintaining frequently accessed data on-premises while securely storing all of your data encrypted.

Afi

Afi

Afi.ai is the latest generation of data protection for M365, Google Workspace & Kubernetes. Clean & responsive UI, easy to use SLA-based protection settings, and 2-3x better backup/restore performance compared to legacy vendors.

RainyDay Backup

RainyDay Backup

RainyDay Backup offers an easily configurable system that enables you to back up your Azure DevOps source code, Work Items and NuGet artifacts and more.

runrestic

runrestic

It is a simple Python wrapper script for the Restic backup software that initiates a backup, prunes any old backups according to a retention policy, and validates backups for consistency. The script supports specifying your settings in a declarative configuration file rather than having to put them all on the command-line, and handles common errors.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

It minimizes downtime and data loss with fast, reliable recovery of on-premises and cloud-based applications using affordable storage, minimal compute, and point-in-time recovery.

EaseUS

EaseUS

It is a leading software provider for partition manager, data backup, and recovery.

Backrightup

Backrightup

It is a 1-click backup for Azure Devops. It gives you peace of mind that you can recover from any ransomware, malicious or accidental data deletion.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope