Ampersand.js vs GWT

Overview

Ampersand.js

Stacks16

Followers22

Votes31

GitHub Stars811

Forks41

GWT

Stacks88

Followers100

Votes0

Ampersand.js vs GWT: What are the differences?

Developers describe Ampersand.js as "A highly modular, loosely coupled, non-frameworky framework for building advanced JavaScript apps". We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules. On the other hand, GWT is detailed as "*An open-source set of tools to create and maintain complex JavaScript front-end applications *". It is a development toolkit for building and optimizing complex browser-based applications. Its goal is to enable productive development of high-performance web applications without the developer having to be an expert in browser quirks, XMLHttpRequest, and JavaScript.

Ampersand.js and GWT belong to "Javascript MVC Frameworks" category of the tech stack.

Ampersand.js is an open source tool with 816 GitHub stars and 51 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Ampersand.js's open source repository on GitHub.

liandri.it, Shore GmbH, and Infiniscene are some of the popular companies that use Ampersand.js, whereas GWT is used by LTE Consulting, Whatfix, and Unmetric. Ampersand.js has a broader approval, being mentioned in 4 company stacks & 11 developers stacks; compared to GWT, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 5 developer stacks.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Turbo Frameworks

A set of techniques for creating fast, modern, progressively enhanced web apps

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

9

Detailed Comparison

Ampersand.js	GWT
We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.	It is a development toolkit for building and optimizing complex browser-based applications. Its goal is to enable productive development of high-performance web applications without the developer having to be an expert in browser quirks, XMLHttpRequest, and JavaScript.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 811	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 41	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 16	Stacks 88
Followers 22	Followers 100
Votes 31	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Open source 4 Micromodules 3 CommonJS 3 npm 3 Loosely Coupled	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Ampersand.js, GWT?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.