Android SDK vs JHipster

Overview

Android SDK

Stacks27.6K

Followers20.7K

Votes800

JHipster

Stacks200

Followers327

Votes0

GitHub Stars22.2K

Forks4.1K

Android SDK vs JHipster: What are the differences?

Programming Language: Android SDK is primarily based on Java and Kotlin languages, while JHipster focuses on Java and various front-end technologies like Angular, React, and Vue.js along with Spring Boot for the backend.
Purpose: Android SDK is specifically designed for developing mobile applications for Android devices, whereas JHipster is a development platform for creating modern web applications with support for microservices architecture.
Community Support: The Android SDK has a large and active community given its widespread use, offering extensive documentation and resources. JHipster, on the other hand, has a rapidly growing community with a focus on generating boilerplate code and improving developer productivity.
Tooling: Android SDK comes with a suite of tools including Android Studio for development, debugging, and testing of Android applications. JHipster provides a command-line interface for generating projects, entities, and running applications, along with support for popular IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA and Visual Studio Code.
Deployment: Android applications are typically deployed to the Google Play Store for distribution, while JHipster applications can be deployed to various cloud platforms like Docker, Kubernetes, and Heroku for scalability and maintainability.
Integration: Android SDK offers deep integration with Android platform-specific features like notifications, location services, and sensors, whereas JHipster integrates with a wide range of technologies and frameworks to provide a robust full-stack development experience.

In Summary, Android SDK and JHipster cater to different types of development needs, with Android SDK focusing on mobile app development for Android devices and JHipster targeting modern web application development with microservices architecture.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Android SDK, JHipster

Omran

CTO & Co-founder at Bonton Connect

Jun 19, 2020

Needs adviceon

Kotlin

We actually initially wrote a lot of networking code in Kotlin but the complexities involved prompted us to try and compile NodeJS for Android and port over all the networking logic to Node and communicate with node over the Java Native Interface.

This turned out to be a great decision considering our battery usage fell by 40% and rate of development increased by a factor of 2.

622k views622k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Android SDK	JHipster
Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.	It is a free and open-source application generator used to quickly develop modern web applications and Microservices using Spring Boot + Angular / React / Vue.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 22.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 4.1K
Stacks 27.6K	Stacks 200
Followers 20.7K	Followers 327
Votes 800	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 289 Android development 156 Necessary for android 128 Android studio 86 Mobile framework 82 Backed by google	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Java	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Android SDK, JHipster?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Android SDK vs JHipster: What are the differences?

Programming Language: Android SDK is primarily based on Java and Kotlin languages, while JHipster focuses on Java and various front-end technologies like Angular, React, and Vue.js along with Spring Boot for the backend.
Purpose: Android SDK is specifically designed for developing mobile applications for Android devices, whereas JHipster is a development platform for creating modern web applications with support for microservices architecture.
Community Support: The Android SDK has a large and active community given its widespread use, offering extensive documentation and resources. JHipster, on the other hand, has a rapidly growing community with a focus on generating boilerplate code and improving developer productivity.
Tooling: Android SDK comes with a suite of tools including Android Studio for development, debugging, and testing of Android applications. JHipster provides a command-line interface for generating projects, entities, and running applications, along with support for popular IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA and Visual Studio Code.
Deployment: Android applications are typically deployed to the Google Play Store for distribution, while JHipster applications can be deployed to various cloud platforms like Docker, Kubernetes, and Heroku for scalability and maintainability.
Integration: Android SDK offers deep integration with Android platform-specific features like notifications, location services, and sensors, whereas JHipster integrates with a wide range of technologies and frameworks to provide a robust full-stack development experience.

Android SDK vs JHipster

Overview