StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. anime.js vs mo.js

anime.js vs mo.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

mo.js
mo.js
Stacks2
Followers4
Votes0
GitHub Stars18.7K
Forks885
anime.js
anime.js
Stacks44
Followers67
Votes0
GitHub Stars65.1K
Forks4.4K

anime.js vs mo.js: What are the differences?

The comparison between anime.js and mo.js will help in understanding the key differences between these two JavaScript animation libraries.

  1. Ease of Use: Anime.js is known for its simple syntax and ease of use, making it suitable for beginners and experienced developers alike. On the other hand, mo.js uses a different approach, requiring a steeper learning curve for users due to its more complex syntax and setup.

  2. Features: Anime.js offers a wide range of built-in animations and functionalities, making it a comprehensive solution for various animation needs. Meanwhile, mo.js focuses more on providing advanced customization options and control over animations, catering to users looking for more precise and intricate animations.

  3. Performance: In terms of performance, anime.js is generally regarded as more lightweight and efficient, making it a preferred choice for projects where performance optimization is crucial. Mo.js, while powerful, has been criticized for its heavier footprint and potential impact on performance in certain scenarios.

  4. Community Support: Anime.js boasts a larger and more active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available to assist users. Mo.js, although also supported by a dedicated community, may lack the same level of resources and support as anime.js.

  5. Compatibility: Anime.js is compatible with a wide range of browsers and devices, ensuring broad accessibility for users across different platforms. On the other hand, mo.js may have limitations in terms of browser compatibility and may require additional polyfills or fallbacks to function properly in certain environments.

  6. Learning Curve: Anime.js is praised for its user-friendly documentation and intuitive API, allowing for a shorter learning curve for users to get started with creating animations. Mo.js, with its more complex syntax and features, may require a deeper understanding of animation concepts and techniques, resulting in a steeper learning curve for beginners.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between anime.js and mo.js can help developers make informed decisions when choosing an animation library for their projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

mo.js
mo.js
anime.js
anime.js

It is a javascript motion graphics library that is a fast, retina ready, modular and open source. In comparison to other libraries, it have a different syntax and code animation structure approach. The declarative API provides you a complete control over the animation, making it customizable with ease.

It is a lightweight JavaScript animation library with a simple, yet powerful API. It works with CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes and JavaScript Objects.

Motion graphics library; Fast; Retina ready; Modular and open source
Layered CSS transforms; Controls and callbacks;Animate anything
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.7K
GitHub Stars
65.1K
GitHub Forks
885
GitHub Forks
4.4K
Stacks
2
Stacks
44
Followers
4
Followers
67
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Opera Browser
Opera Browser
JavaScript
JavaScript
CSS 3
CSS 3
HTML5
HTML5
Safari
Safari
Firefox
Firefox
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge
Google Chrome
Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to mo.js, anime.js?

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Lodash

Lodash

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

Ramda

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase