Ant Design vs Belle: What are the differences?
# Key Differences between Ant Design and Belle
Ant Design and Belle are both popular UI component libraries, but they differ in various aspects. Below are the key differences between the two:
1. **Component Variety**: Ant Design offers a more extensive range of components compared to Belle. Ant Design provides a comprehensive set of ready-to-use components such as buttons, modals, forms, and more, while Belle focuses on a smaller set of components with a simpler design approach.
2. **Theming and Customization**: Ant Design allows for easier theming and customization through its predefined themes, while Belle offers limited theming capabilities. Ant Design provides a more extensive selection of themes and color palettes that can be easily applied throughout the application.
3. **Documentation**: Ant Design has more detailed and extensive documentation compared to Belle. Ant Design's documentation is comprehensive, with examples, guidelines, and detailed explanations for each component, making it easier for developers to understand and implement the various features.
4. **Popularity and Community Support**: Ant Design has a larger user base and a more active community compared to Belle. This means that developers using Ant Design are more likely to find resources, discussions, and support from the community, making it easier to troubleshoot issues and enhance their development experience.
5. **Performance Optimization**: Ant Design is optimized for better performance compared to Belle. Ant Design focuses on optimizing its components for speed and efficiency, ensuring that applications built using the library load faster and provide a smoother user experience.
6. **Ease of Integration**: Ant Design is designed to be easily integrated into various frontend frameworks and libraries, such as React and Angular, making it more versatile and adaptable for different project requirements compared to Belle.
In Summary, Ant Design and Belle differ in component variety, theming and customization options, documentation quality, popularity and community support, performance optimization, and ease of integration.