StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript Framework Components
  5. Ant Design vs Buefy

Ant Design vs Buefy

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ant Design
Ant Design
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes224
GitHub Stars96.5K
Forks53.9K
Buefy
Buefy
Stacks98
Followers164
Votes9
GitHub Stars9.6K
Forks1.1K

Ant Design vs Buefy: What are the differences?

  1. Component Library: Ant Design is primarily focused on providing a comprehensive set of components for building enterprise-level applications with a more traditional look and feel, suitable for business and professional use. Buefy, on the other hand, offers lightweight and customizable components inspired by Google's Material Design, making it ideal for projects requiring a modern and sleek design aesthetic.

  2. Styling: Ant Design comes with its unique design language that may require some customization to align with existing brand styles. Buefy, being based on Material Design, offers a more standardized and cohesive visual identity out of the box, making it easier to integrate into projects without extensive styling modifications.

  3. Framework Support: Ant Design has extensive support for React, Angular, and Vue, making it a versatile choice for developers using different frameworks. Buefy, on the other hand, is tailored specifically for Vue.js, providing deeper integration and seamless compatibility with Vue projects.

  4. Community and Documentation: Ant Design has a larger and more established community with comprehensive documentation, making it easier to find solutions to common problems and leverage community support. Buefy, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller community and less extensive documentation, potentially leading to challenges in finding resources and assistance.

  5. Customization Options: Both Ant Design and Buefy offer customization options, but Ant Design provides more extensive theming capabilities, allowing for finer control over the visual appearance of components. Buefy, while offering some customization features, may have limitations compared to the level of customization available in Ant Design.

  6. Internationalization Support: Ant Design provides built-in support for internationalization (i18n), making it easier to create applications that cater to a global audience with multiple language requirements. Buefy also supports i18n but may require additional configuration and setup compared to the seamless integration offered by Ant Design.

In Summary, Ant Design and Buefy differ in their focus on components, styling, framework support, community, customization options, and internationalization support, catering to different project requirements and design preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ant Design
Ant Design
Buefy
Buefy

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

We like to think that Buefy is the javascript layer for your Bulma interface, since it doesn't require for it to be a sophisticated Single-Page Application. You can import it completely or single components on a ordinary webpage and use Vue.js as a replacement for jQuery.

Cases; Principles; Proximity; Alignment; Contrast; Repetition; Make it Direct; Stay on the Page; Keep it Lightweight; Provide an Invitation; Use Transition; React Immediately; Colors; Icons; Font; Copywriting.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
96.5K
GitHub Stars
9.6K
GitHub Forks
53.9K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
98
Followers
1.7K
Followers
164
Votes
224
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 48
    Lots of components
  • 33
    Polished and enterprisey look and feel
  • 21
    TypeScript
  • 21
    Easy to integrate
  • 18
    Es6 support
Cons
  • 24
    Less
  • 10
    Large File Size
  • 4
    Poor accessibility support
  • 3
    Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries
Pros
  • 4
    Ease of integration into an existing project
  • 4
    Small and lightweight
  • 1
    Rich components
Cons
  • 2
    Not supported by a well known company
Integrations
React
React
jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
VueStrap
VueStrap
Vue.js
Vue.js
Bulma
Bulma

What are some alternatives to Ant Design, Buefy?

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Angular Universal

Angular Universal

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Angular Material

Angular Material

Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.

React Rainbow

React Rainbow

It is a collection of components that will reliably help you build your application in a snap. More than 60 components built on top of React.

Chakra UI

Chakra UI

It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.

PrimeReact

PrimeReact

PrimeReact is a rich set of open source UI Components for React.

MD Bootstrap

MD Bootstrap

It is a UI kit built with an aim to cut the time developers need to create their websites by taking all the best features from vanilla Bootstrap and enhancing them with a distinctive design from Google.

React Router

React Router

React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering.

styled-components

styled-components

Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅

Mantine

Mantine

It is an MIT licensed open source React components and hooks library with a focus on usability, accessibility, and developer experience. You can build fully functional accessible web applications faster than ever – it includes more than 120 customizable components and hooks to cover you in any situation.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase