Ant Design vs Evergreen

Overview

Ant Design

Stacks1.4K

Followers1.7K

Votes224

GitHub Stars96.5K

Forks53.9K

Evergreen

Stacks12

Followers34

Votes0

GitHub Stars12.4K

Forks816

Ant Design vs Evergreen: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the world of web development, choosing the right UI framework is crucial. Two popular choices are Ant Design and Evergreen. Although they both serve a similar purpose, there are key differences that set them apart. Let's dive into the specific contrasts between Ant Design and Evergreen.

Components: Ant Design offers a wide range of UI components with a focus on a rich visual experience. It provides a complete set of ready-to-use components, such as forms, tables, and buttons, which are highly customizable. Evergreen, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and minimalism. It offers a smaller set of components that are designed to be flexible and easy to use.
Design Language: Ant Design follows a predefined design language with a modern and sleek appearance. It provides a consistent look and feel across all its components, making it suitable for projects that require a unified design aesthetic. In contrast, Evergreen does not enforce a specific design language. It emphasizes a more versatile approach, allowing developers to customize the look and feel of individual components according to their project's needs.
Technology Stack: Ant Design is primarily built for React applications. It leverages React's component-based architecture to provide a seamless integration with React projects. Evergreen, on the other hand, is built using React but can be used with any JavaScript framework or library. It provides a higher degree of flexibility, making it suitable for a wider range of projects.
Community Support: Ant Design has a larger and more established community compared to Evergreen. It has been widely adopted by developers and has a well-documented ecosystem, including comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and a vibrant community forum. Evergreen, although relatively newer, is gaining popularity and has an active community. However, it may have fewer resources available compared to Ant Design.
UI Customization: Ant Design provides an extensive theming system that allows developers to customize the visual aspects of their application with ease. It offers a range of pre-built themes and allows developers to create their own themes. Evergreen, on the other hand, does not offer a built-in theming system. Developers need to manually style their components using CSS or other styling libraries.
Accessibility: Ant Design prioritizes accessibility and provides comprehensive support for screen readers, keyboard navigation, and other accessibility features. It follows best practices to ensure that its components are accessible to all users. Evergreen also considers accessibility but may not have the same level of support and attention to detail as Ant Design.

In Summary, Ant Design offers a rich set of customizable components with a predefined design language and a strong focus on accessibility. It is primarily built for React applications and has a larger community. Evergreen, on the other hand, emphasizes simplicity and flexibility, allowing customization based on project needs. It is suitable for any JavaScript framework, has a growing community, and may offer less extensive theming options and accessibility support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Ant Design, Evergreen

vishal

Feb 10, 2021

Needs advice

Which framework should I choose? Features that we are looking for:

Rapid Development
Drag and Drop functionality from Treeview to GridView
Better Performance with large data
Optimal deployment package
Flexible to extend the functionality of any component
Supports Lazy Loading, Multi-column sorting, Column Resizing, Virtual scrolling,

215 views215

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ant Design	Evergreen
An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.	Evergreen is a pragmatic UI kit for building evolving products on the web. It is built and maintained open-source by Segment.
Cases; Principles; Proximity; Alignment; Contrast; Repetition; Make it Direct; Stay on the Page; Keep it Lightweight; Provide an Invitation; Use Transition; React Immediately; Colors; Icons; Font; Copywriting.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 96.5K	GitHub Stars 12.4K
GitHub Forks 53.9K	GitHub Forks 816
Stacks 1.4K	Stacks 12
Followers 1.7K	Followers 34
Votes 224	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 48 Lots of components 33 Polished and enterprisey look and feel 21 TypeScript 21 Easy to integrate 18 Es6 support Cons 24 Less 10 Large File Size 4 Poor accessibility support 3 Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries	No community feedback yet
Integrations
React jQuery UI Bootstrap VueStrap	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Ant Design, Evergreen?

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Angular Universal

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Angular Material

Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.

React Rainbow

It is a collection of components that will reliably help you build your application in a snap. More than 60 components built on top of React.

Chakra UI

It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.

PrimeReact

PrimeReact is a rich set of open source UI Components for React.

MD Bootstrap

It is a UI kit built with an aim to cut the time developers need to create their websites by taking all the best features from vanilla Bootstrap and enhancing them with a distinctive design from Google.

React Router

React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering.

styled-components

Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅

Buefy

We like to think that Buefy is the javascript layer for your Bulma interface, since it doesn't require for it to be a sophisticated Single-Page Application. You can import it completely or single components on a ordinary webpage and use Vue.js as a replacement for jQuery.

Related Comparisons

Ant Design vs Evergreen: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Components: Ant Design offers a wide range of UI components with a focus on a rich visual experience. It provides a complete set of ready-to-use components, such as forms, tables, and buttons, which are highly customizable. Evergreen, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and minimalism. It offers a smaller set of components that are designed to be flexible and easy to use.
Design Language: Ant Design follows a predefined design language with a modern and sleek appearance. It provides a consistent look and feel across all its components, making it suitable for projects that require a unified design aesthetic. In contrast, Evergreen does not enforce a specific design language. It emphasizes a more versatile approach, allowing developers to customize the look and feel of individual components according to their project's needs.
Technology Stack: Ant Design is primarily built for React applications. It leverages React's component-based architecture to provide a seamless integration with React projects. Evergreen, on the other hand, is built using React but can be used with any JavaScript framework or library. It provides a higher degree of flexibility, making it suitable for a wider range of projects.
Community Support: Ant Design has a larger and more established community compared to Evergreen. It has been widely adopted by developers and has a well-documented ecosystem, including comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and a vibrant community forum. Evergreen, although relatively newer, is gaining popularity and has an active community. However, it may have fewer resources available compared to Ant Design.
UI Customization: Ant Design provides an extensive theming system that allows developers to customize the visual aspects of their application with ease. It offers a range of pre-built themes and allows developers to create their own themes. Evergreen, on the other hand, does not offer a built-in theming system. Developers need to manually style their components using CSS or other styling libraries.
Accessibility: Ant Design prioritizes accessibility and provides comprehensive support for screen readers, keyboard navigation, and other accessibility features. It follows best practices to ensure that its components are accessible to all users. Evergreen also considers accessibility but may not have the same level of support and attention to detail as Ant Design.

Ant Design vs Evergreen

Overview