Ant Design vs Preact

Overview

Preact

Stacks1.1K

Followers292

Votes28

Ant Design

Stacks1.4K

Followers1.7K

Votes224

GitHub Stars96.5K

Forks53.9K

Ant Design vs Preact: What are the differences?

Introduction

Ant Design and Preact are both popular frontend development libraries used to build user interfaces. While Ant Design focuses on providing a set of customizable UI components, Preact is a lightweight alternative to React that offers a smaller footprint and faster performance.

Component Library: Ant Design offers a comprehensive set of ready-to-use UI components that are highly customizable and follow a consistent design language. These components can be easily integrated into any web project, saving development time and effort. Preact, on the other hand, does not provide a specific component library. It serves as a lightweight alternative to React, allowing developers to build their own components or use popular third-party libraries.
Performance: Preact is designed to be smaller and faster than React. It achieves this by providing a subset of React's API while still maintaining compatibility with most React code. Its smaller bundle size contributes to faster page load times and improved overall performance. Ant Design, although built on top of React, does not have the same level of optimization as Preact. However, optimizations such as code splitting and lazy loading can be implemented to improve performance.
Dependencies: Ant Design relies on React and its ecosystem of libraries. This means that in order to use Ant Design, you must also include React as a dependency in your project. Preact, on the other hand, is a standalone library that does not have any external dependencies. This can be beneficial in situations where you want to keep the number of dependencies to a minimum.
Size: As a lightweight alternative to React, Preact has a significantly smaller bundle size compared to React. This can be advantageous in scenarios where the size of the frontend application is a concern, such as in mobile or low-bandwidth environments. Ant Design, being a comprehensive component library built on top of React, has a larger bundle size due to the inclusion of additional UI components and utilities.
Community and Ecosystem: React, being one of the most widely used frontend libraries, has a large and active community. This means that there is a vast ecosystem of libraries, tools, and resources available for React development. Ant Design benefits from this ecosystem, making it easier to find support and resources. Preact, although smaller, also has a growing community and a number of plugins and extensions available.
Maturity and Adoption: React has been around for a longer period of time and has been widely adopted by developers and organizations. It has proven to be a robust and reliable solution for building complex user interfaces. Ant Design, being built on top of React, benefits from its maturity and adoption. Preact, while gaining popularity, may not have the same level of maturity and adoption as React.

In Summary, Ant Design is a comprehensive UI component library built on top of React, providing a rich set of customizable components. Preact, on the other hand, is a lightweight alternative to React that offers smaller bundle sizes and improved performance. Both have their own advantages and can be used based on specific project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Preact, Ant Design

Damiano

Oct 27, 2019

Decided

Preact offers an API which is extremely similar to React's for less than 10% of its size (and createElement is renamed to h, which makes the overall bundle a lot smaller). Although it is less compatible with other libraries than the latter (and its ecosystem is nowhere as developed), this is generally not a problem as Preact exposes the preact/compat API, which can be used as an alias both for React and ReactDOM and allows for the use of libraries which would otherwise just be compatible with React.

25.6k views25.6k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Preact	Ant Design
Preact is an attempt to recreate the core value proposition of React (or similar libraries like Mithril) using as little code as possible, with first-class support for ES2015. Currently the library is around 3kb (minified & gzipped).	An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.
-	Cases; Principles; Proximity; Alignment; Contrast; Repetition; Make it Direct; Stay on the Page; Keep it Lightweight; Provide an Invitation; Use Transition; React Immediately; Colors; Icons; Font; Copywriting.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 96.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 53.9K
Stacks 1.1K	Stacks 1.4K
Followers 292	Followers 1.7K
Votes 28	Votes 224
Pros & Cons
Pros 15 Lightweight 5 Drop-in replacement for React 4 Performance 3 Props/state passed to render 1 ES6 class components	Pros 48 Lots of components 33 Polished and enterprisey look and feel 21 Easy to integrate 21 TypeScript 18 Es6 support Cons 24 Less 10 Large File Size 4 Poor accessibility support 3 Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries
Integrations
React	React jQuery UI Bootstrap VueStrap

What are some alternatives to Preact, Ant Design?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Related Comparisons

Ant Design vs Preact: What are the differences?

Introduction

Component Library: Ant Design offers a comprehensive set of ready-to-use UI components that are highly customizable and follow a consistent design language. These components can be easily integrated into any web project, saving development time and effort. Preact, on the other hand, does not provide a specific component library. It serves as a lightweight alternative to React, allowing developers to build their own components or use popular third-party libraries.
Performance: Preact is designed to be smaller and faster than React. It achieves this by providing a subset of React's API while still maintaining compatibility with most React code. Its smaller bundle size contributes to faster page load times and improved overall performance. Ant Design, although built on top of React, does not have the same level of optimization as Preact. However, optimizations such as code splitting and lazy loading can be implemented to improve performance.
Dependencies: Ant Design relies on React and its ecosystem of libraries. This means that in order to use Ant Design, you must also include React as a dependency in your project. Preact, on the other hand, is a standalone library that does not have any external dependencies. This can be beneficial in situations where you want to keep the number of dependencies to a minimum.
Size: As a lightweight alternative to React, Preact has a significantly smaller bundle size compared to React. This can be advantageous in scenarios where the size of the frontend application is a concern, such as in mobile or low-bandwidth environments. Ant Design, being a comprehensive component library built on top of React, has a larger bundle size due to the inclusion of additional UI components and utilities.
Community and Ecosystem: React, being one of the most widely used frontend libraries, has a large and active community. This means that there is a vast ecosystem of libraries, tools, and resources available for React development. Ant Design benefits from this ecosystem, making it easier to find support and resources. Preact, although smaller, also has a growing community and a number of plugins and extensions available.
Maturity and Adoption: React has been around for a longer period of time and has been widely adopted by developers and organizations. It has proven to be a robust and reliable solution for building complex user interfaces. Ant Design, being built on top of React, benefits from its maturity and adoption. Preact, while gaining popularity, may not have the same level of maturity and adoption as React.

Ant Design vs Preact

Overview

Ant Design vs Preact: What are the differences?